Luke Hughes out 6-8 weeks

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,284
33,862
I wasn't aware EV GD was biased against Luke Hughes, my apologies.
It's biased against players who are used in EN situations that play for teams that end up pulling their goalie a lot. Not sure if you knew this, but it's a lot easier for the opposition to score when your goalie is not in net.
 
Last edited:

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
3,397
2,952
He was -4 at 5v5, and +9 without Brendan Smith as his partner (48GF 39GA).

Pretty stupid to use ES goal differential, as it includes EN situations.
EV goal differential is good as long as you use a site that doesn't include empty net situations as even strength.

Evolving Hockey doesn't include empty net situations in their even strength numbers
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhiskeyYerTheDevils

Pavels Dog

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
20,777
16,511
Sweden
It's biased against players who are used in EN situations that play for teams that end up pulling their goalie a lot. Not sure if you knew this, but it's a lot easier for the opposition to score when your goalie is not in net.
Sorry, I wasn't aware this only applied to Luke Hughes.

Let me edit my post.

"Don't slander the 134th best 5v5 Goal differential like that.."
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,284
33,862
Sorry, I wasn't aware this only applied to Luke Hughes.
Well seeing as how the devils played more mins with the goalie pulled than any other team in the league, EN goal differential does disproportionately target Luke.
Let me edit my post.

"Don't slander the 134th best 5v5 Goal differential like that.."

When people criticize Seider, I fully expect you to respond with "don't slander the 153rd best 5v5 goal differential like that"

Luke Hughes 51GF 55GA in 1369 TOI
Moritz Seider 63GF 69GA in 1348 TOI
 

Pavels Dog

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
20,777
16,511
Sweden
When people criticize Seider, I fully expect you to respond with "don't slander the 153rd best 5v5 goal differential like that"

Luke Hughes 51GF 55GA in 1369 TOI
Moritz Seider 63GF 69GA in 1348 TOI
Why am I not surprised your only defense is to deflect into a Seider discussion.

Let me just say you completely invalidate any attempt at being perceived as someone who understands analytics or context for numbers when you attempt to put Seider and Hughes on the same level.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TBF1972

HeadLiceHatty

Registered User
Dec 26, 2011
3,637
3,969
Tokyo, Japan
I’ve hated jersey since I was a kid as a long time flyers fan, but some of the comments about a kid getting an injury are pretty gross. Hope he recovers and is healthy the full year, shoulder injuries suck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xirik

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,284
33,862
Why am I not surprised your only defense is to deflect into a Seider discussion.
No need to deflect, Hughes is a tremendous young defenseman.
Let me just say you completely invalidate any attempt at being perceived as someone who understands analytics or context for numbers when you attempt to put Seider and Hughes on the same level.
I'm not the one using 5v5 goal differential as the core identifier of a player.

It's also quite laughable watching you call for context now that your own argument has been turned against you.
 

Pavels Dog

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
20,777
16,511
Sweden
I'm not the one using 5v5 goal differential as the core identifier of a player.
I didn't, and I don't. But so far your counter to Ace's comment about Hughes consists of "empty net goals are biased against him" and "But Seider!", neither of which are amazing arguments and neither of which actually adresses what he said. Especially if we are to believe the mainstream opinion around here that Seider is a replacement level d-man.
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,284
33,862
I didn't, and I don't.
But you did.
But so far your counter to Ace's comment about Hughes consists of "empty net goals are biased against him" and "But Seider!", neither of which are amazing arguments and neither of which actually adresses what he said.
I addressed what you said, which was fundamentally stupid.

If Hughes' goal differential proves him to be such a liability, what does that make Seider?

Especially if we are to believe the mainstream opinion around here that Seider is a replacement level d-man.
Seider is an excellent young defenseman, just like Luke.
 

Pavels Dog

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
20,777
16,511
Sweden
But you did.

I addressed what you said, which was fundamentally stupid.

If Hughes' goal differential proves him to be such a liability, what does that make Seider?


Seider is an excellent young defenseman, just like Luke.
Not sure why you're fine with what Ace said but a simple stat triggers you so much. Hughes is a great young d-man but arguing that he doesn't have flaws defensively is a losing battle imo. Seider has them too, if you insist on that meaningless comparison. Brock Faber too, if he's relevant.
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,284
33,862
Not sure why you're fine with what Ace said but a simple stat triggers you so much.
Because you actually tried to support it with a stupid statistic.
Hughes is a great young d-man but arguing that he doesn't have flaws defensively is a losing battle imo. Seider has them too, if you insist on that meaningless comparison. Brock Faber too, if he's relevant.
Who said he doesn't have flaws? He's a 21 year old dman, they never come flawless. But he's still really good, especially for his age.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HBK27 and Fatass

TheDawnOfANewTage

Dahlin, it’ll all be fine
Dec 17, 2018
12,936
19,136
Players are pushed too hard to stay engaged 12 months of the year. Preseason injuries used to be a rarity unless someone was in a car accident or something. Now these guys are finishing the season in mid June, working out for 3 months, and jumping right back into training camps by mid September. Prospects have it even worse with summer tourneys and development camps.

It’s over-intensive and no surprise that people’s bodies break down as a result.

Disagree, I think they’re training harder and smarter for a faster, more dangerous league. Fitness and training are taken so much more seriously now, and so much more is known, but we’re seeing guys retire with hip, knee, shoulder, and head issues. Accidents just happen along the way- you could reduce the offseason injuries to 0 by having ‘em all have mandated vacations, but I think the season would be very ugly in all ways, injuries included.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
86,606
143,908
Bojangles Parking Lot
Disagree, I think they’re training harder and smarter for a faster, more dangerous league. Fitness and training are taken so much more seriously now, and so much more is known, but we’re seeing guys retire with hip, knee, shoulder, and head issues. Accidents just happen along the way- you could reduce the offseason injuries to 0 by having ‘em all have mandated vacations, but I think the season would be very ugly in all ways, injuries included.

Speed of the game is a whole other issue and yes, it’s probably too fast in some ways. We’ve seen interference creep back into forechecking and the main reason offered for the lack of rule enforcement is safety. Much like the NFL’s issue with kick returns, players going balls-to-the-wall and colliding with each other isn’t a sustainable way to play.

Part of it is rosters being too big. It’s taken for granted that 30 second shifts are a good thing because everyone likes seeing players go fast, but do we actually enjoy seeing random drones sprinting up and down the ice for 40 minutes? The game would be better with about 5 fewer players on the roster, for recognizability and also for slowing things down and letting people see the stick skills and agility that can happen at slower speeds. But we’re stuck with this game unless something dramatic happens with the CBA (the NHL had a chance to improve this when new teams were added, but AFAIK it wasn’t even considered).

So you get a league where players feel they have to be ready in mid September to blast off at full Pavel Bure speed for meaningless scrimmages in September. Which means intensive summer training, which means joints break down faster and faster. It’s little different than all the goalies who retire with hip injuries because they just have to butterfly on every save, even though this is terrible for the joints and ultimately leads to missed games and seasons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhiskeyYerTheDevils

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
26,057
13,457
Speed of the game is a whole other issue and yes, it’s probably too fast in some ways. We’ve seen interference creep back into forechecking and the main reason offered for the lack of rule enforcement is safety. Much like the NFL’s issue with kick returns, players going balls-to-the-wall and colliding with each other isn’t a sustainable way to play.

Part of it is rosters being too big. It’s taken for granted that 30 second shifts are a good thing because everyone likes seeing players go fast, but do we actually enjoy seeing random drones sprinting up and down the ice for 40 minutes? The game would be better with about 5 fewer players on the roster, for recognizability and also for slowing things down and letting people see the stick skills and agility that can happen at slower speeds. But we’re stuck with this game unless something dramatic happens with the CBA (the NHL had a chance to improve this when new teams were added, but AFAIK it wasn’t even considered).

So you get a league where players feel they have to be ready in mid September to blast off at full Pavel Bure speed for meaningless scrimmages in September. Which means intensive summer training, which means joints break down faster and faster. It’s little different than all the goalies who retire with hip injuries because they just have to butterfly on every save, even though this is terrible for the joints and ultimately leads to missed games and seasons.
The game would be worse removing 5 players, ie 4th line of forwards and 3rd pairing D. That would be more taxing on the players.

Watching NFL kickoffs looks stupid now, what’s next flag football.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad