Value of: Lucic, Sekera, & 10th pick to create cap space?

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,316
102,020
When does sekeras contract change ? Either way it’s bad timing to trade both of them at their lowest value tho

I posted this earlier but you may not have seen it.

Lucic's is a full NMC for the next 3 seasons then goes to an 8-10 team (that he can be traded to) NTC/Modified NMC in June 2021.
Sekera's is a full NMC for this coming season, then goes to a 15 team (that he can be traded to) NTC before the following season.
 

Seanaconda

Registered User
May 6, 2016
9,701
3,442
I posted this earlier but you may not have seen it.

Lucic's is a full NMC for the next 3 seasons then goes to an 8-10 team (that he can be traded to) NTC/Modified NMC in June 2021.
Sekera's is a full NMC for this coming season, then goes to a 15 team (that he can be traded to) NTC before the following season.
Thank you , since sekera won’t have to be protected for the next expansion I think the oilers should see if he rebounds . If we can offload lucic I might do it because he is annoying to watch but he only had like one goal in the last half of the season. Can’t see his value getting worse
 

oXo Cube

Power Play Merchant
Nov 4, 2008
11,328
12,201
In your closet
Edmonton will give Sekera another year to get it together. He at least was really good prior to the recent injury.

The fans would be willing to send Lucic packing but I'm unconvinced the management would be.
 

tucker3434

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 7, 2007
20,294
11,353
Atlanta, GA
Nobody takes on that much salary in one trade. You might find a taker for Sekera for something very small. Somebody gambling that he bounces back.

I’d need a lot more than 10th overall to take on Lucic. Way too much term.
 

Seanaconda

Registered User
May 6, 2016
9,701
3,442
Edmonton will give Sekera another year to get it together. He at least was really good prior to the recent injury.

The fans would be willing to send Lucic packing but I'm unconvinced the management would be.
Yeah chia won’t give up on lucic when he was his hall replacement .
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,792
27,847
East Coast
Lucic and Sekera both have negative value. IF they are willing to waive their NMC, the Oilers would have to package the 10th pick with them to get someone to take those contracts. You are being far too kind to the Oilers here. Even Bergevin wouldn't do the deal you offered. If Patches was going back the Oilers would have to add even more to the 10th pick because Pacioretty is worth at least a first round pick at the trade deadline. And that is without taking bad contracts back.

The idea was to spark the negotiation. I totally understand how much I was offering and it's not an official offer. It's to gauge the interest and to try to make both sides happy
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,792
27,847
East Coast
Nobody takes on that much salary in one trade. You might find a taker for Sekera for something very small. Somebody gambling that he bounces back.

I’d need a lot more than 10th overall to take on Lucic. Way too much term.

$11.5M going one way an $7.3M going the other way. It's not impossible. Especially with the cap likely rising $5M this offseason
 

ChaoticOrange

Registered User
Jun 29, 2008
51,534
31,376
Edmonton
Thank you , since sekera won’t have to be protected for the next expansion I think the oilers should see if he rebounds . If we can offload lucic I might do it because he is annoying to watch but he only had like one goal in the last half of the season. Can’t see his value getting worse

Russell’s NMC is similar to Sekera’s FWIW.

I think it’s best for the Oilers to see if Lucic and Sekera bounce back rather than give up a prime asset like 10th overall for a package that would leave us with virtually nothing at the end of the year.

Also 25 games coming back from major surgery is apparently enough to give Sekera ‘negative value’ but Habs fans get upset when I say Pacioretty’s value took a huge hit last year...
 
  • Like
Reactions: TFHockey

Draiskull

Registered User
Oct 26, 2005
23,388
2,246
the 10 OA is a steep price to pay to upgrade Lucic into Pacioretty. High 1st dont get used as cap dump.
Lucic+Sekera+1st for Pacioretty+ would be an easy yes from the Oilers but there is 0 chance MTL makes that offer.

Pacioretty and Lucic are same age and Pacio would be commanding a 6M+ contract if he gets back to his old self.

Oilers in a year lose 10 OA for nothing or get Lucic 2.0
 

Seanaconda

Registered User
May 6, 2016
9,701
3,442
Russell’s NMC is similar to Sekera’s FWIW.

I think it’s best for the Oilers to see if Lucic and Sekera bounce back rather than give up a prime asset like 10th overall for a package that would leave us with virtually nothing at the end of the year.

Also 25 games coming back from major surgery is apparently enough to give Sekera ‘negative value’ but Habs fans get upset when I say Pacioretty’s value took a huge hit last year...
Montreal fans have always valued patches way too much . I think they are starting to realize they won’t get a young number one center for him now
 

ChaoticOrange

Registered User
Jun 29, 2008
51,534
31,376
Edmonton
Also OP Pakarinen and Slepyshev are both KHL bound, they won’t be getting re-signed. Here’s where I think we stand going into next season.

RNH (6) McDavid (12.5) Rattie (800k)
Grabner (3.5) Drai (8.5) JP (950k or 3.75 depending on bonuses which can carry over)
Lucic (6) Strome (2.5) Aberg (650k)
Caggiula (1.3) Khaira (650k) Kassian (1.8)
Malone (650k) Czarnik (700k)

Klefbom (4.16) Larsson (4.16)
Nurse (4.5) Russell (4)
Sekera (5.5) Benning (1.25)
Sproul (900k)

Talbot (4.16)
Koskinen (2.5)

I think that’s a reasonable-ish projection without trades and that’s 78 mil or so. Lots of flexibility after this season though.
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,792
27,847
East Coast
Montreal fans have always valued patches way too much . I think they are starting to realize they won’t get a young number one center for him now

You must realize that the Habs fan base is huge and our opinions on what we can get for Patch varies. After the trade deadline, I have been looking for the Lucic return (Bruins/Kings trade) as my bench mark in a trade. The trade I offered in this thread is my plan B. Personally, I am willing to be aggressive and take on bad contracts while using Patch and our cap space as leverage

Grouping Habs fans all in one opinion is ridiculous. You must realize this. If you don't, you are only making yourself look bad. Also, The value for Patch is in the middle of most of what you have seen. He does have way more value than most want to admit on these boards though.
 

Seanaconda

Registered User
May 6, 2016
9,701
3,442
You must realize that the Habs fan base is huge and our opinions on what we can get for Patch varies. After the trade deadline, I have been looking for the Lucic return (Bruins/Kings trade) as my bench mark in a trade. The trade I offered in this thread is my plan B. Personally, I am willing to be aggressive and take on bad contracts while using Patch and our cap space as leverage

Grouping Habs fans all in one opinion is ridiculous. You must realize this. Also, The value for Patch is in the middle of most of what you have seen.

Fair , other guy said he wouldn’t want the 10th because the habs can trade him for a first at the deadline but that will probably be a at worse pick . Really depends on what Montreal wants to do tho. They are in a Tough spot with price and Weber it’s hard to go rebuild
 

780il

edm
May 29, 2018
12,626
14,473
Edmonton AB
They bith have NMC's and I cant see them both waiving for Montreal. They want to win cups, with Mcdavid here for the next 8 years, there is always a chance. Plus that 10th overall needs to and will be used to fix the d.
 

LeafsOHLRangers98

Registered User
Jun 13, 2017
6,653
6,809
I think you would have to do something like take a worse player on shorter term and then still retain 50% to move Lucic at this point. Kussell, Sekera, Lucic locked in for at least the next 3-6 is uglyyy.

Martin types for Lucic @50% or something similar is what you're looking at unless a team really loves the guy.
 

Seanaconda

Registered User
May 6, 2016
9,701
3,442
Also OP Pakarinen and Slepyshev are both KHL bound, they won’t be getting re-signed. Here’s where I think we stand going into next season.

RNH (6) McDavid (12.5) Rattie (800k)
Grabner (3.5) Drai (8.5) JP (950k or 3.75 depending on bonuses which can carry over)
Lucic (6) Strome (2.5) Aberg (650k)
Caggiula (1.3) Khaira (650k) Kassian (1.8)
Malone (650k) Czarnik (700k)

Klefbom (4.16) Larsson (4.16)
Nurse (4.5) Russell (4)
Sekera (5.5) Benning (1.25)
Sproul (900k)

Talbot (4.16)
Koskinen (2.5)

I think that’s a reasonable-ish projection without trades and that’s 78 mil or so. Lots of flexibility after this season though.
After this season we need to resign or get a new goalie also is nurses hit a guess ? Yamo could make the team too but I doubt he has much bonus money he could make
 

Seanaconda

Registered User
May 6, 2016
9,701
3,442
I think you would have to do something like take a worse player on shorter term and then still retain 50% to move Lucic at this point. Kussell, Sekera, Lucic locked in for at least the next 3-6 is uglyyy.

Martin types for Lucic @50% or something similar is what you're looking at unless a team really loves the guy.
Could probably get better than Martin for lucic at 3 million, someone would take the chance he bounces back to 50 points or whatever his average is
 

ChaoticOrange

Registered User
Jun 29, 2008
51,534
31,376
Edmonton
After this season we need to resign or get a new goalie also is nurses hit a guess ? Yamo could make the team too but I doubt he has much bonus money he could make

Nurse, Caggiula, Benning and Strome are all guesses, as are Grabner Czarnik and Sproul as UFA’s.

We do need to sign a goalie after this year but both Talbot and Koskinen are 1 year deals and 6.75 or so between them, that’s plenty for goaltending.
 

Captain Bowie

Registered User
Jan 18, 2012
27,139
4,414
I'd be willing to take Sekara on as a cap dump, interested to see what else could come along with him. Lucic... that's a hard no. In 3-4 years the Canucks are gonna be ready to be competitive, if not sooner, and that contract will continue to be a hindrance for too long.
 

Seanaconda

Registered User
May 6, 2016
9,701
3,442
Nurse, Caggiula, Benning and Strome are all guesses, as are Grabner Czarnik and Sproul as UFA’s.

We do need to sign a goalie after this year but both Talbot and Koskinen are 1 year deals and 6.75 or so between them, that’s plenty for goaltending.
I would put in bear before benning or sproul just cuz he is our best option for the pp atm
 

ManofSteel55

Registered User
Aug 15, 2013
33,545
14,044
Sylvan Lake, Alberta
Lucic (5 more years at $6M, age 30-34)

Sekera (3 more years at $5.5M, Age 32-34)

What kind of moves do the Oilers want to make and how much cap space to they have?

- Currently 16 players signed with $15M in cap space ($80M cap)

- RFA's to sign: Nurse, Strome, Benning, Slepyshev, Pakarinen, Caggiula. After these guys are signed, it's likely looks like 22 players signed with very little cap space left. Maybe $2M +/- ?

- UFA's: Cammy, Auvito

If a team is willing to absorb the Lucic and Sekera contracts, what kind of package do teams offer the Oilers if they add the 10th pick? This could return a player they can use to build a winner and much needed cap space in the process.

Is this of any interest from the Oilers perspective?
Pakarinen, Auvitu and Slepyshev are heading to Europe, Cagguila, Benning and Strome will be getting little in terms of raises. Nurse is the only RFA who will be getting a significant bump up.

Chiarelli isn't going to trade Lucic after one bad (ie, horrifically awful) season. He's going to give him a chance to rebound before paying someone to take him.
 

Rorschach

Who the f*** is Trevor Moore?
Oct 9, 2006
11,570
2,121
Los Angeles
Even if you could get both guys to waive, dumping Lucic alone will require multiple firsts from Edmonton if you don't take back an almost equally bad contract.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad