Speculation: - Loyalty | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Speculation: Loyalty

TonsofPuppies

#Shanapackyourshit
Jun 28, 2021
664
2,450
Toronto, Ontario
With Mitch Marner's time as a Leaf quickly coming to an end, the concept of loyalty has been at the forefront of my mind. It was the downfall of Shanahan - being too loyal to his stars, even undermining his own GM(s) at times to do so. It's quite funny how Mitch has no such loyalty to this team even after they gave him everything he ever wanted (and far more than he ever deserved).

This situation is exactly why I've always been against this idea of loyalty in sports. Pro sports is a business, just like any other. You have to be ruthless to climb to the top. Being overly loyal to your guys will just make them entitled and disloyal in return. The organization needs to run like the Golden Knights. Cutthroat. Merciless. Hopefully some hard lessons were learned from this saga and the Leafs have a new mindset going forward in future contract negotiations, starting with Matthew Knies.
 
I don’t think it needs to be cut throat

I like what Tampa did with Stamkos. They were firm on their offer and he left town. They got a younger, better player with that money

Be firm but don’t have a bad reputation that turns guys off. Vegas us known to do that stuff now and some guys will wonder if they will be next before they sign
 
I get being loyal to winners, but being loyal to losers is a recipe for disaster, you earn loyalty, it's not just "given."

Shanahan thought Matthews was Yzerman (he wasn't) but forgot Yzerman needed him and Lidstrom to take off, we don't have anybody even remotely close to Lidstrom and none of the other powder puffs are close to the sort of player he was in his prime as a power forward.
 
I don’t think it needs to be cut throat

I like what Tampa did with Stamkos. They were firm on their offer and he left town. They got a younger, better player with that money

Be firm but don’t have a bad reputation that turns guys off. Vegas us known to do that stuff now and some guys will wonder if they will be next before they sign

Did Guentzel have a better season than Stamkos did last year. No. What did replacing Stamkos do for Tampa, they still lost in round 1.
 
With Mitch Marner's time as a Leaf quickly coming to an end, the concept of loyalty has been at the forefront of my mind. It was the downfall of Shanahan - being too loyal to his stars, even undermining his own GM(s) at times to do so. It's quite funny how Mitch has no such loyalty to this team even after they gave him everything he ever wanted (and far more than he ever deserved).

This situation is exactly why I've always been against this idea of loyalty in sports. Pro sports is a business, just like any other. You have to be ruthless to climb to the top. Being overly loyal to your guys will just make them entitled and disloyal in return. The organization needs to run like the Golden Knights. Cutthroat. Merciless. Hopefully some hard lessons were learned from this saga and the Leafs have a new mindset going forward in future contract negotiations, starting with Matthew Knies.


Don't generalize based on one situation.
 
Loyalty should come after the player has earned it.

The Leafs made a mistake by giving everything to their core players and then blindly defending them despite the mediocre results.

This is not loyalty; it has been a continuous display of stubbornness and stupidity from Shanny.

Bingo. If one threatens to sit out, then sit out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eternal Leaf
I feel like there’s actually a deficit in loyalty coming from the players side.

Even reports of John Tavares, not someone you automatically want back but maybe at a discount, suddenly he’s upping the price to align with the Nelson side and not the Duchene discount. Even shining young gun Knies; loves to be here but far apart.

We’ve just built too much of a mercenary, bet on yourself mentality from the Shanny Dubas days and I’m not impressed.
 
I feel like there’s actually a deficit in loyalty coming from the players side.

Even reports of John Tavares, not someone you automatically want back but maybe at a discount, suddenly he’s upping the price to align with the Nelson side and not the Duchene discount. Even shining young gun Knies; loves to be here but far apart.

We’ve just built too much of a mercenary, bet on yourself mentality from the Shanny Dubas days and I’m not impressed.

A large part of this teams issue with the fans is the players are so damn unlikeable from doing this. If we're on our 2nd cup no one cares but our last 10 years history combined with demanding every cent is rough to sell
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeafGrief
I don’t think it needs to be cut throat

I like what Tampa did with Stamkos. They were firm on their offer and he left town. They got a younger, better player with that money

Be firm but don’t have a bad reputation that turns guys off. Vegas us known to do that stuff now and some guys will wonder if they will be next before they sign
Tampa also kicked out McDonagh. They also traded Sergachev a week before his trade protection kicked in.
 
I don't believe Shanahan was overly loyal to the star players as much as he thought they - and the team - could either improve or generally maintain a level of consistency (ex. not missing the playoffs altogether even if they couldn't ever advance far enough in said playoffs).

Loyalty isn't really much of a thing in pro sports though when teams have the ability to trade away players, or players have a say in what team they end up playing on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Westlander
You don't have to be as ruthless as Vegas to win. The Bruins, for example, are and were reasonably loyal to their players and got them to sign sweetheart deals. The Leafs have put similar levels of faith in their players but have almost nothing to show for it so far, besides maybe Matthews deciding to re-sign (at no discount whatsoever) instead of walk as soon as he could.
 
Crazy to ask yourself a question and then answer it so wrong.

Guentzel had 41G and 80 points

Stammer had 27G and 53 points

actually imo you mis-read the question that poster asked.

Did Guentzel have a better season than Stamkos did last year. No. What did replacing Stamkos do for Tampa, they still lost in round 1.

see the last year part? meaning 23-24 season. he's comparing Stamkos 23-24 season to Guentzel's 24-25 season and saying that Guentzel wasn't an improvement. nor did he take them anywhere in the playoffs.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad