- Jun 24, 2012
- 85,272
- 156,189
The party is going on in the guy’s pants. He should have worn a saddle.
@sheed36 ’s modem from the future might confirm it.How do you know this? Was it revealed to you in a dream?
The party is going on in the guy’s pants. He should have worn a saddle.
@sheed36 ’s modem from the future might confirm it.How do you know this? Was it revealed to you in a dream?
100% I take Crosby over McDavid. He just makes everyone around him better. McDavid is simply one of the best individual effort players ever born.I dunno man, I think if I'm building a team in hopes of creating a winner, I may take Crosby over McDavid to build around. For all of McDavid's other-worldly gifts which are truly incredible to witness. I think Crosby was the better all around player, they just dominate in different ways.
But then again if I'm building a team I may take Draisatil over him too, so I may be crazy. Despite McDavid being the most aesthetically pleasing player I've ever seen play, along with Lemieux.
As a hockey fan that just wants to be entertained give me McDavid, As a fan that wants to win give me Crosby.
Probably neither tbh but my gut says we will win #2Nope, we have number 1.
I don’t like stamkos and malkin with those other three, one tier belowAs Gord Miller, LeBrun, McGuire all have stated hockey scouts & management project Bedard to be in Pastrnak (mentioned by name) category no slouch by any means but not a generational player. Basically a notch below the Crosby / Ovy / Jagr / Stamkos / Malkin group
Probably neither tbh but my gut says we will win #2
Bedard up front and I bet that 6’6” goalie becomes the next Dryden with the Florida crap pickNah we got 1, seriously.
Bedard is a Hab
I’m already nervous, lol.T-24.
It’s getting serious.
80% we draft #6
19% we draft #7
1% we draft #5
Those are my odds
We need a PPG+ player not a 3rd line C.IF Montreal picks 5th or 6th, I wouldn't be surprised to see Dvorsky become a Hab.
Future Danault with a little more offensive upside. Only, more likely to be satisfied as a 3rd line C, something Danault wasn't excited about as a possibility.
Regardless, I see St-Louis rolling out an undefined top-9, with lines mattering less and less.
Dvorsky as Montreal,s pick leaves beck as a potential trade chip when trying to acquire Dubois (FLA pick + Beck + Harris).
C-line of Suzuki - Dubois - Dvosky - Evans (for now)
Caufield - Suzuki - Dach
Roy - Dubois - Anderson
Slafkovsky - Dvorsky - Mesar
RHP - Evans - Heineman
This is the scenario that makes us all cryIF Montreal picks 5th or 6th, I wouldn't be surprised to see Dvorsky become a Hab.
Future Danault with a little more offensive upside. Only, more likely to be satisfied as a 3rd line C, something Danault wasn't excited about as a possibility.
Regardless, I see St-Louis rolling out an undefined top-9, with lines mattering less and less.
Dvorsky as Montreal,s pick leaves beck as a potential trade chip when trying to acquire Dubois (FLA pick + Beck + Harris).
C-line of Suzuki - Dubois - Dvosky - Evans (for now)
Caufield - Suzuki - Dach
Roy - Dubois - Anderson
Slafkovsky - Dvorsky - Mesar
RHP - Evans - Heineman
Prediction.....No 7.
Maybe early, as you say, but this is what likely happens, IMO, in the end. maybe minus Mesar, though.Prediction.....No 7.
Really? You're all very sensitive, thenThis is the scenario that makes us all cry
Who would be that at 5th or 6th OA?We need a PPG+ player not a 3rd line C.
I did it in the past 100 times and we only got 1st OA the first time at the 26th simulation and 2nd OA at 31st.I just simmed the lottery 10 times
We got the 6th pick 6 times
2nd pick 2 times
5th pick 1 time
1st pick 1 time