Lost human cilvilizations?

Stylizer1

Teflon Don
Jun 12, 2009
19,873
3,967
Ottabot City
Unbelievable that such a thing would just be flooded away on purpose.
This has happened many times over thousands of years. More recently in order to create dams in various parts of the worlds valleys (where people lived because the ground was very fertile) needed to be flooded. As the ice from the ice ages melted so many civilizations where probably washed away too. It's too bad not enough efort is made to search the coastline but the cost would be enormous.


 
  • Like
Reactions: tarheelhockey

Stylizer1

Teflon Don
Jun 12, 2009
19,873
3,967
Ottabot City



It has been theorised that the ancient builders of the pyramids used sound the cut/move the blocks. Stones that resonate like this could help explain that theory.



 
Last edited:

Stylizer1

Teflon Don
Jun 12, 2009
19,873
3,967
Ottabot City
Oh, I mean go ahead and start now. No sense planning past the next decade or two.
I don't think that would be an extinction event. I saw a graph where they estimate it would hit along a line reaching from the Philippines across the Pacific, all the way to new york. If it hit the water near Asia it would probably send a massive Tsunami that would hit the west coast of North and South America.



Graham Hancock and Randal Carlson theorize multiple impacts hit the North American Ice Sheet causing a rapid welt as opposed to a gradual one put forth by modern scientists. Had a 90 meter in diameter asteroid hit the ice that could have cause much of the damage they are talking about.

Cool as hell.
 

Hippasus

1,9,45,165,495,1287,
Feb 17, 2008
5,911
492
Bridgeview
I don't think that would be an extinction event. I saw a graph where they estimate it would hit along a line reaching from the Philippines across the Pacific, all the way to new york. If it hit the water near Asia it would probably send a massive Tsunami that would hit the west coast of North and South America.



Graham Hancock and Randal Carlson theorize multiple impacts hit the North American Ice Sheet causing a rapid welt as opposed to a gradual one put forth by modern scientists. Had a 90 meter in diameter asteroid hit the ice that could have cause much of the damage they are talking about.

Cool as hell.

If it hits water, hopefully some surfer dude with a smartphone tapes it and posts it on Twitter.
 

Stylizer1

Teflon Don
Jun 12, 2009
19,873
3,967
Ottabot City
1679703806122.png

Bolide Events 1994-2013
This diagram maps the data gathered from 1994-2013 on small asteroids impacting Earth’s atmosphere to create very bright meteors, technically called “bolides” and commonly referred to as “fireballs”. Sizes of red dots (daytime impacts) and blue dots (nighttime impacts) are proportional to the optical radiated energy of impacts measured in billions of Joules (GJ) of energy, and show the location of impacts from objects about 1 meter (3 feet) to almost 20 meters (60 feet) in size.
Image credit: Planetary Science
 

JMCx4

Welcome to: The Dumbing Down Era of HFBoards
Sep 3, 2017
15,048
9,953
St. Louis, MO
Hmmmmm, we seem to have deviated from the thread topic (he says with no sense of irony ...).
 

Stylizer1

Teflon Don
Jun 12, 2009
19,873
3,967
Ottabot City
Hmmmmm, we seem to have deviated from the thread topic (he says with no sense of irony ...).
Part of the story behind lost civilizations is where did they go. One of the theories is that meteors wiped them out. I post info pertaining to how likely meteor strikes are and the type of damage the can produce. We travel through the taurid meteor stream twice a year. It mostly results in shooting stars but there is a chance that this is where larger meteors came from that caused extreme devastation when they came into our atmosphere,
 
  • Like
Reactions: tacogeoff and JMCx4

Beau Knows

Registered User
Mar 4, 2013
11,691
7,622
Canada
Watched a bit of Hancock's netflix show, man is it ever bad.

I'm pretty sure most scientists with the evidence on their side don't spend their time making a tv show where they constantly whine about how much "the scientific community hates me" and "why won't they take me seriously?".
 

tacogeoff

Registered User
Jul 18, 2011
11,622
1,846
Killarney, MB
Shouldn't this thread be in the entertainment sub-forum?
"To err is human, which is really not a very good excuse.

And to err as a scientist is worse, of course, because depending on science is supposed to be the best way for people to make sure they’re right. But since scientists are human (most of them, anyway), even science is never free from error. In fact, mistakes are fairly common in science, and most scientists tell you they wouldn’t have it any other way. That’s because making mistakes is often the best path to progress."

and I would say the interpretation/understanding of history falls into the same boat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stylizer1

JMCx4

Welcome to: The Dumbing Down Era of HFBoards
Sep 3, 2017
15,048
9,953
St. Louis, MO
"To err is human, which is really not a very good excuse.

And to err as a scientist is worse, of course, because depending on science is supposed to be the best way for people to make sure they’re right. But since scientists are human (most of them, anyway), even science is never free from error. In fact, mistakes are fairly common in science, and most scientists tell you they wouldn’t have it any other way. That’s because making mistakes is often the best path to progress." ...
Seems that long quote should have been attributed to Tom Siegfried. Unless you're him, in which case ... thanks.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
86,563
143,674
Bojangles Parking Lot
"To err is human, which is really not a very good excuse.

And to err as a scientist is worse, of course, because depending on science is supposed to be the best way for people to make sure they’re right. But since scientists are human (most of them, anyway), even science is never free from error. In fact, mistakes are fairly common in science, and most scientists tell you they wouldn’t have it any other way. That’s because making mistakes is often the best path to progress."

and I would say the interpretation/understanding of history falls into the same boat.

This is of course quite true. Our understanding of history is continually being revised in light of new discovery, which is the way it should be. Even just in the past few years, we have come to new understandings about the world's most carefully-studied places like Stonehenge and Pompeii. Let alone the kinds of things people stumble across in the desert or jungle, unknown for centuries. Discovery leads to correction... that's science.

I think the comment about the entertainment subforum was directed more toward the "speculative history" aspects of this thread, and perhaps specifically toward the Allan Savory video above where he basically says peer review is incompatible with scientific advancement. One cannot claim to have a desire to improve science while being contemptuous of the fundamentals of scientific thought.
 

JMCx4

Welcome to: The Dumbing Down Era of HFBoards
Sep 3, 2017
15,048
9,953
St. Louis, MO
oh sorry. i thought the " ...... " would have indicated it was a quote.
The quotation marks made me curious who authored them. At least you weren't quoting some guy who sat next to you on the crosstown bus. Sources are important to credibility as well as context.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: tarheelhockey

Stylizer1

Teflon Don
Jun 12, 2009
19,873
3,967
Ottabot City
This is of course quite true. Our understanding of history is continually being revised in light of new discovery, which is the way it should be. Even just in the past few years, we have come to new understandings about the world's most carefully-studied places like Stonehenge and Pompeii. Let alone the kinds of things people stumble across in the desert or jungle, unknown for centuries. Discovery leads to correction... that's science.

I think the comment about the entertainment subforum was directed more toward the "speculative history" aspects of this thread, and perhaps specifically toward the Allan Savory video above where he basically says peer review is incompatible with scientific advancement. One cannot claim to have a desire to improve science while being contemptuous of the fundamentals of scientific thought.
The comment was directed at me because he is a troll who lacks imagination.
 

Stylizer1

Teflon Don
Jun 12, 2009
19,873
3,967
Ottabot City

Planet killer asteroid 'the size of Mount Everest' to skim past Earth tomorrow​

Buckle up, because a mountain-sized ‘planet killer’ asteroid will fly past Earth on Thursday – quickly followed by another that was only spotted a few weeks ago.

The big one, the catchily-named 2011 asteroid (415029) 2011 UL21, is a monstrous 2,310 metres wide, bigger than 99% of all other known near-Earth objects (NEOs) and bigger than any mountain in the UK.


You might hear it is similar in size to Mount Everest, but given the world’s tallest peak is almost nine kilometres high, this generous comparison appears to be in reference to the width of the summit.

And while it is big enough to fall into the ‘planet killer’ category, it is only a fraction of the size of the Chicxulub asteroid thought to have wiped out the dinosaurs, estimated at around 10 kilometres, or six miles, wide.

Unlike most other NEOs, it isn’t orbiting the Sun on a similar plane to the planets, but instead is at a steep angle – possibly due to the effects of Jupiter’s massive gravitational effects. As noted by the European Space Agency (ESA), Jupiter has been known to knock previously-safe asteroids towards Earth.
MSN
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad