Los Angeles Kings and GM Rob Blake part ways | Page 3 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Los Angeles Kings and GM Rob Blake part ways

I would imagine this is a close second to winning the Stanley Cup for the Kings fanbase.

1. The day my kid was born
2. 2012 Stanley Cup
3. 2014 Stanley Cup
4. Rob Blake release

The nice way to fire a franchise player I guess. He made some decent moves and some terrible ones.

I believe it was simply because he didn't have a contract, corporate speak for yeah we aint re-signing you


LA following the footsteps of Calgary and Vancouver. One year after another

The main character syndrome with these guys, my lord
 
I was going to say Blake actually did well this year--it almost felt like that last gasp of Dean Lombardi where it sounded like he was ready to rebuild, but it was too late...similar scenario here, too little too late. If this was the year we had in 2023 or 2024, I think most of us would have been more ok with it. But it had just been too long...longest stretch in Kings frnachise history without a playoff series victory, 3rd longest active streak in the league.

Of course, the bigger problem is if it's JUST Blake walking...if everyone else stays unscathed, we're in a WORSE spot. The Luc-Bergevin-Brisson human centipede is the real issue behind the curtain.
 
I’d rather Blake than Bergevin. A Bergevin hiring just confirms Luc is in charge, when he shouldn’t be. Especially concerning given the fact that he was a huge pain in the ass to Dean Lombardi when he was here. The only man to ever bring the Kings a cup, and the GM who had the shortest leash a Kings GM has ever had in my 20 years as a fan.
 
Happy Christmas morning, Kings fans.
For the most part, but that all depends on the replacement. Luc is the most threatening piece if he is not removed as well. If we end up with Bergevin as the replacement then there will be a riot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guitpik
They had it right on PLD, one year too early....but the cost to acquire was nuts. The pivot to a number 1 goalie was a pretty good move.

Fiala was a good get but at the cost of Faber and a 1st. Ouch.

Congrats Kings fans...sounds like you are happy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: King'sPawn
I read somewhere that Luc has media availability tomorrow at 2pm so....that's a pretty clear signal he's staying no?

We are good and properly f***ed if Luc and Bergevin are hanging around.

You just killed darth maul but Luc is palpatine!

1746467329899.gif
 
Im sure a new direction was needed, things get stale sometimes.

I grew up in the 90s on the east coast. But what I know and remember about Rob Blake was he was a hell of a defenceman for the Kings.
 
They had it right on PLD, one year too early....but the cost to acquire was nuts. The pivot to a number 1 goalie was a pretty good move.

Fiala was a good get but at the cost of Faber and a 1st. Ouch.

Congrats Kings fans...sounds like you are happy.
No we just had a good appetizer after not eating for 8 years!
 
I thought he's been terrible long before that.

I remember about fourish years ago everyone raved about how insane their prospect pool was when in reality it was anything but.
They just kept everyone away from the big club so the hype stayed but as soon as most of them made the show, they were shown to be at best overrated but mostly they were just busts. Even worse was the dmen who hit are almost all not even with the team anymore.

Brandt is a fine player but way overrated imo and Byfield I was never a huge fan of and personally I thought was just a big kid that dominated because of that.
He's obviously a good player but has not lives up to being a #2 overall pick yet some kings fans have the nerve to say he's more valuable than Quinn Hughes which is just silly.

Nothing directed at you personally, but this comment typifies so many of the myths about prospects and team building that predominate here on HF.

The most central myth:

Having one of the very best prospect pools (actual or perceived) is mostly what determines future success.

The Kings really did have one of the very best, even with hindsight:

Vilardi, Mikey Anderson, Turcotte, Faber, Byfield, Clarke, Kupari, Laferriere, Kaliyev, Spence, etc...

Go back and compare that to other team's lists circa 2021.

It certainly doesn't help that Blake traded away two of the best. But that gets at another myth, that we can really know beforehand which if these guys are going to be stars and which won't be.

And if you think that the book is written on the 22 year olds in Clarke and Byfield, then that's another myth in play. Have a look at the primes for scorers these days. Guys aren't hitting until 24. There's very few U24 players among the top scorers. You can count on one hand the number of U23 impact players in the NHL.

It seems like there are a lot of HF Kings fans clamoring for another rebuild as if doing it right this time would lead to predictable success or lead to success some time before 2030, and neither is the case. If you blow up the Kings you could easily end up with a much worse team or a team that doesn't ripen until some point in the 2030s. The Blake rebuild was a failure in terms of building a contender but it was a success compared to most rebuilds.
 
Lol, every King's fan was happy when they traded PLD. It's just now when PLD looks solid on Washington it's all of a sudden a bunch of people appear that "always knew PLD would be great".
This is categorically untrue when referring to the first PLD trade. Plenty of Kings fans hated not just getting PLD, but trading away Vilardi+ for him.

And many of us were opposed to the Fiala for Faber+ trade.

We've been waiting for him to leave for a while.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad