nelli27
Moderator
I didn't realize you guys had 2 former Waterloo Wolves.Hunter Solomon looking pretty darn good so far.
I didn't realize you guys had 2 former Waterloo Wolves.Hunter Solomon looking pretty darn good so far.
Do you think they’ll name a captain soon or just gonna wait it out even more?Interesting and kind of surprised that the leadership event tonight was a bit of a fizzle. No one named as C. Only 17 and 39 had the A on their jerseys.
I believe the captain isn't on the team yet....Interesting and kind of surprised that the leadership event tonight was a bit of a fizzle. No one named as C. Only 17 and 39 had the A on their jerseys.
I think he is, just need for him to prove he can stay healthy.I believe the captain isn't on the team yet....
I think he is, just need for him to prove he can stay healthy.
So would you argue that its simply age keeping it from Dickinson this year?I do not think their is anyone who currently deserves the C at this point, Bonk or George would be the closest two but even that would be stretching it. Mackinnon who I believe you are eluding to is not the answer either based on my observations on and off the ice, too quiet and his on ice play does not speak loud enough either when healthy. McCue and Sim you just can't trust to not be in the sin bin or go batshit crazy. Barkey and Cowan have not matured enough yet IMO.
Dickinson is almost guaranteed the C next year. In saying that you will not want to give Bonk the C this year to strip it away next year....
So would you argue that its simply age keeping it from Dickinson this year?
The guy seems to already be a leader. He's poised on the ice and by all accounts looks like a good teammate. He was already part of the U17 leadership group too and if I recall they had pretty good results.
If it were my decision I would just put the C on him already..
I don't disagree with your thought process there.I would have absolutely no issue with doing that, it will continue to groom him and I am sure he will have lots of help from those that surround him. Based on how the Hunter clan operates, I have a hard time believing they are giving a C to a 17 year old whether he is ready or not.
I have heard from some sources that Barkey is all but guaranteed the C next season.I do not think their is anyone who currently deserves the C at this point, Bonk or George would be the closest two but even that would be stretching it. Mackinnon who I believe you are eluding to is not the answer either based on my observations on and off the ice, too quiet and his on ice play does not speak loud enough either when healthy. McCue and Sim you just can't trust to not be in the sin bin or go batshit crazy. Barkey and Cowan have not matured enough yet IMO.
Dickinson is almost guaranteed the C next year. In saying that you will not want to give Bonk the C this year to strip it away next year....
I have heard from some sources that Barkey is all but guaranteed the C next season.
As for this season, the lowdown is this:
17 would have been named C if not for his injury (one of the vocal leaders in the dressing room last season and very well-liked and respected by his teammates).
39 is next logical but coaching staff don't feel he can be a true leader.
4 is too quiet to be a leader.
3 not considered a leader at this point, neither are 59, 90 nor 92.
7 has developed an ego since coming back from NHL training camp.
31 is the most vocal leader in the dressing room but unfortunately can't be named C because of his position
86 is the most mature of the youngsters and a good leader, but too young to be named C this season (probably next season).
There's a possibility that a C will be named in the next few weeks. But they may ride it out for a while and see how it all shakes out.
I don't think that trading for a veteran and making him the C would sit well with the team at this point unless it was someone that the team really respected and liked (a la local boy George Diaco last season) but I can't see that happening.
Is this certain? If so why did we take him???William moore is playing for the U.S in the u17 tournament. Looks like he's choosing the us path which is bad news for london ( even more so that he was our first rounder)
I saw his name on the us roster. I'd give him this year, but if he doesn't come next season....Is this certain? If so why did we take him???
Can this same logic be used to say that Lev Katzin is more likely to report to the Storm next season as he's listed on the Canadian roster? Or no, because he doesn't have dual citizenship?I saw his name on the us roster. I'd give him this year, but if he doesn't come next season....
Nope. Not talking about lev. I just think moore might not come, but that's my opinionCan this same logic be used to say that Lev Katzin is more likely to report to the Storm next season as he's listed on the Canadian roster? Or no, because he doesn't have dual citizenship?
Petes fans will always miss MVP Simpson, but we are very happy with Liam Sztuska and Zach Bowen patrolling the crease. How has the reception of Simpson been in Knights town been?I have heard from some sources that Barkey is all but guaranteed the C next season.
As for this season, the lowdown is this:
17 would have been named C if not for his injury (one of the vocal leaders in the dressing room last season and very well-liked and respected by his teammates).
39 is next logical but coaching staff don't feel he can be a true leader.
4 is too quiet to be a leader.
3 not considered a leader at this point, neither are 59, 90 nor 92.
7 has developed an ego since coming back from NHL training camp.
31 is the most vocal leader in the dressing room but unfortunately can't be named C because of his position
86 is the most mature of the youngsters and a good leader, but too young to be named C this season (probably next season).
There's a possibility that a C will be named in the next few weeks. But they may ride it out for a while and see how it all shakes out.
I don't think that trading for a veteran and making him the C would sit well with the team at this point unless it was someone that the team really respected and liked (a la local boy George Diaco last season) but I can't see that happening.
Good question. Age maybe?Sam question as above then I guess, if Barkey is considered next year's C why not just give it to him now and let him run with it?
Team and City absolutely love him.Petes fans will always miss MVP Simpson, but we are very happy with Liam Sztuska and Zach Bowen patrolling the crease. How has the reception of Simpson been in Knights town been?
To be brutally honest, I find Simpson to be somewhat underwhelming, so far. Perhaps it's because he's following in Brett Brochu's role and he was a bona fide game stealer, at times. Haven't yet seen that from Simpson, and feel that he has been playing more down to Willmore's level, rather that establishing himself as the clear-cut #1 starter. That said, the season is early, and he just might begin showing that he has much more to give, than what's been given, so far. Hopefully, that'll begin to become more apparent.Petes fans will always miss MVP Simpson, but we are very happy with Liam Sztuska and Zach Bowen patrolling the crease. How has the reception of Simpson been in Knights town been?
that sounds fair enough. I can tell you from watching Simpson that he no doubt can have some game saving and game winning moments, especially in the last playoffs, but I think he will round into form for the Knights.To be brutally honest, I find Simpson to be somewhat underwhelming, so far. Perhaps it's because he's following in Brett Brochu's role and he was a bona fide game stealer, at times. Haven't yet seen that from Simpson, and feel that he has been playing more down to Willmore's level, rather that establishing himself as the clear-cut #1 starter. That said, the season is early, and he just might begin showing that he has much more to give, than what's been given, so far. Hopefully, that'll begin to become more apparent.
I agree he's well like by his teammates and coaches he deserves it he has worked his tail off from day 1So would you argue that its simply age keeping it from Dickinson this year?
The guy seems to already be a leader. He's poised on the ice and by all accounts looks like a good teammate. He was already part of the U17 leadership group too and if I recall they had pretty good results.
If it were my decision I would just put the C on him already..
Was blindside to the head easy to hit a player like that when they don't see it coming testa is gutlessTesta obliterated Dickinson, looked like a possible headshot in realtime but haven't seen a replay yet..