Very true. Most teams would have cut their losses 2 years ago.Stanley was pretty good last night actually. But, I do hope he gets an opportunity to move on. It's a shame how shabbily he's been treated here.
Very true. Most teams would have cut their losses 2 years ago.Stanley was pretty good last night actually. But, I do hope he gets an opportunity to move on. It's a shame how shabbily he's been treated here.
Stanley was pretty good last night actually. But, I do hope he gets an opportunity to move on. It's a shame how shabbily he's been treated here.
Stanley was pretty good last night actually. But, I do hope he gets an opportunity to move on. It's a shame how shabbily he's been treated here.
I'm referring more to his treatment by the fans. I take more of a value based approach to my criticism, such as Wheeler 8.5M, Schmidt at 6 fu---king million dollars!Logan Stanley’s spot in the lineup is attributable solely to Logan Stanley.
I'm referring more to his treatment by the fans. I take more of a value based approach to my criticism, such as Wheeler 8.5M, Schmidt at 6 fu---king million dollars!
Stanley does exactly what he's here for.
He had a decent game last night - probably good enough to support the needs expected from a 6/7/8 dman -My previous post was tongue in cheek. I do actually like the kid. But really, can anyone say that he hasn't been given a legitimate opportunity to succeed in Winnipeg? This is not some Jason Bonsignore situation where the GM was hissing at him on day one. It's been almost seven years since Stanley was drafted for pete's sake. The Jets org has been very patient and accommodating.
At this point it's probably best for everyone if Stanley moves on to someplace else.
...and scored more goals than Scheifele, Wheeler, Ehlers, and Connor combined.He had a decent game last night - probably good enough to support the needs expected from a 6/7/8 dman -
So is that success for a $900K dman or do they all need to be top 4 before they are successful.
The guy missed most of the season due to injury - he's playing OK under the circumstances and based on his pay check, he's depth that we may need.
If he wants out in hopes for a more stable role, let him go -
But I don't get the continues dialogue around all the opportunity and patience the org has provided with the added presumption that he has not succeeded.
He is what he is - depth - and that is how they are paying him and using him..
He had a decent game last night - probably good enough to support the needs expected from a 6/7/8 dman -
So is that success for a $900K dman or do they all need to be top 4 before they are successful.
The guy missed most of the season due to injury - he's playing OK under the circumstances and based on his pay check, he's depth that we may need.
If he wants out in hopes for a more stable role, let him go -
But I don't get the continues dialogue around all the opportunity and patience the org has provided with the added presumption that he has not succeeded.
He is what he is - depth - and that is how they are paying him and using him.
That crippling of Kaprizov is exactly why like I said, he could be the difference between winning and losing a round. I don't approve of his methods, but if this was the start of a 7 game series against the wilds which could easily happen, he could be the difference maker.Man. Big Stan scores a goal and injures Kaprizov by sitting on him. THE CRITICS HAVE BEEN SILENCED!
I'm not saying I called it, but it's an obvious conclusion.I think it's too early to tell, until they're in the 2nd week of the playoffs. He has components that could be critical in later rounds, when everyone is too banged up to fly straight.
I think he just wants to play - can't blame him for wanting a full time spot and we can't blame him for the org backlog of LHD'sThe Jets seem content with who and what Stanley is. I agree that he's a decent player for the money. But he's the one who thinks he is being held back, or at least that's the implication of his request.
I think he just wants to play - can't blame him for wanting a full time spot and we can blame him for the org backlog of LHD's
I feel like he's just hit a breaking point. He's in the twilight years of his career at this point he has nothing to lose. In the past it seemed like everyone himself included were just trying to keep him from screwing up.say what you say about Stanley . He scores big goals for us .
2 in the Montreal series and a huge goal last night .
I love that he is rough as well. We need that .
Samburg is just there . Doesn’t stand out : doesn’t hit like collage . Just meh
At least Stanley does things to stand out every once and a while ( some bad )
Having stanley as a giant rat would benifit this team tremendously.I feel like he's just hit a breaking point. He's in the twilight years of his career at this point he has nothing to lose. In the past it seemed like everyone himself included were just trying to keep him from screwing up.
It feels like he's just gone into another mindset. At least that's what I gather from the bit of last nights game I actually watched. He really has nothing to lose at this point. If he falls back out of the line up he'll be selling used cars in 2-3 years.
He got a goal and took out a division rivals star player. He shut a guy down for the equivalent of at least a round and he didn't even go in the box. That's a million dollar move for better or worst. He's horrible as the big man demelo type, maybe him turning into a rat is how he makes his money, have seen less shocking things in life.
brah seriously? 2 games out of his 118 we can point too? how about all the chaotic and terrible defensive plays? or other offensive posessions he has killed.say what you say about Stanley . He scores big goals for us .
2 in the Montreal series and a huge goal last night .
I love that he is rough as well. We need that .
Samburg is just there . Doesn’t stand out : doesn’t hit like collage . Just meh
At least Stanley does things to stand out every once and a while ( some bad )
Just Becusee the rest of the team shit the bed after his big goals doesn’t mean they didn’t matter .brah seriously? 2 games out of his 118 we can point too? how about all the chaotic and terrible defensive plays? or other offensive posessions he has killed.
we lost the MTL series 4-0
yesterday was 1 game out of 82 where we lost again.
they were non consequential.
Just Becusee the rest of the team shit the bed after his big goals doesn’t mean they didn’t matter .
What’s samburg done ?
Just Becusee the rest of the team shit the bed after his big goals doesn’t mean they didn’t matter .
What’s samburg done ?
other than than being far better defensively and a pillar on our much improved PK?
oh and he scored 2 goals this year as well.
Nothing. I can’t believe the love for Samburg in these forums. Maybe Chisholm will develop into something, because our scouts and GM have crapped the bed when it comes to drafting d-men during the second half of Jets 2.0 existence.Just Becusee the rest of the team shit the bed after his big goals doesn’t mean they didn’t matter .
What’s samburg done ?
I agree Samburg is just there , no hits, barely gets pucks to the net ,gets burned just as muchNothing. I can’t believe the love for Samburg in these forums. Maybe Chisholm will develop into something, because our scouts and GM have crapped the bed when it comes to drafting d-men during the second half of Jets 2.0 existence.
Samberg actually has the best underlying metrics among defensemen on the team. Of course he doesn’t play against the same competition as Morrissey, but he is far, far ahead of Stanley.Nothing. I can’t believe the love for Samburg in these forums. Maybe Chisholm will develop into something, because our scouts and GM have crapped the bed when it comes to drafting d-men during the second half of Jets 2.0 existence.
I can’t comment on the stats but my eye test suggests this too. There is no doubt though that Stanley is noticeable when on the ice.Samberg actually has the best underlying metrics among defensemen on the team. Of course he doesn’t play against the same competition as Morrissey, but he is far, far ahead of Stanley.
I can’t comment on the stats but my eye test suggests this too. There is no doubt though that Stanley is noticeable when on the ice.
Hard to miss 6'7I can’t comment on the stats but my eye test suggests this too. There is no doubt though that Stanley is noticeable when on the ice.