Recalled/Assigned: Logan Mailloux assigned back to Laval

Estimated_Prophet

Registered User
Mar 28, 2003
11,104
12,273
Yes, and he was really bad during this call up.

Two things can be true at the same time.

He was my top prospect behind Demidov at the start of the season. So I believe in him.

But he was admittedly trash.

HRI7zad.png




I don't think he is as bad as he was during his call up.

For him it's about consistency. On some nights, in the AHL, he would be the best D on the ice -- On some others, one of the worst.

He's like Petry, but in the AHL.

He must find consistency in the lower ranks before making the NHL.













And I maintain he was trash during this call up.

HRI7zad.png

Agreed, he was really bad and needs another year in the AHL at the minimum imo. He has a lot to learn about positioning and reading the ice.

I easily had Reinbacher ahead of him before the season as he is just so much smarter and at a younger age.

His most obvious weakness has always been hockey IQ or at least he appears to have low hockey IQ. Low confidence and nerves can often mask themselves as low IQ so there is no reason to panic but IQ is the single most important trait by an order of magnitude for a hockey player and there has always been concern that he just may not have it.

Hopefully something clicks at some point but we have plenty of time to let him develop as he is very young and has missed significant development time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andrei79

zzoo

Registered User
Mar 9, 2004
3,184
224
Mailloux has a flaw that is the hardest to improve: the IQ or defensive awareness. His offensive instinct is quite good.

Habs have some good offensive D: Hutson, Mailloux and Barron.
 

Treb

Global Flanderator
May 31, 2011
29,624
30,376
Montreal
One of the two of his biggest problems can develop in the AHL. His constant butt-on-ice visits. He needs to develop his balance because he loses a lot of the one-on-one.

His defensive decision making and positioning would be far better off with a vet defensive partner. We have none to give him in the AHL or the NHL

As for trading Savard. If you asked me in August, I was thrilled, ask me now and I'm not trading him for anything. We are woefully on quality defensive play and we would be worse off without Savard.

Maybe everything changes IF...IF we get a top notch defensive coach teaching the young ones the finer points of defensive play.

Learning defence in the AHL will close the current gap a bit so he can learn better at the NHL level.
 

yianik

Registered User
Jun 30, 2009
11,097
6,658
With you overreactions, and mine, we could have lots of fun over beers watching this shitshow of a franchise in a pub
You two would get beat up mouthing off by people trying to cheer on the team.
 

A55P2

Registered User
Jul 14, 2009
2,316
2,388
Québec, Québec
Mailloux was not expected to be a mainstay in the NHL right now.

He did show some things offensively and showed his weaknesses defensively, which is something everyone was already aware off.

His defensive game has evolved in the last year, so we can be optimistic it`s going to progress further. At this time last year, he was one of the worst D defensively in the AHL.
If what we saw was him improved I'm not exactly sure how that's a positive. He just feels unsafe out there at all time.
 

Treb

Global Flanderator
May 31, 2011
29,624
30,376
Montreal
If what we saw was him improved I'm not exactly sure how that's a positive. He just feels unsafe out there at all time.

He was one of the worst D defensively in the AHL at this time last year. He progressed a bunch, but still a long way to go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andrei79

Hannibal

Fear the Weber
Feb 11, 2007
11,009
8,461
Ive no doubt in my mind this guy is our trade bait number 1 for a trade to improve either defence or forwards.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad