aragorn
Do The Right Thing
- Aug 8, 2004
- 29,280
- 9,984
Good point.
Don't you feel this lineup is :
- more talented
- play faster
- better skating
- better passing ability
- better defensively
- wouldn't get ran over more than they are now.
Only weakness vs now is less experience so maybe more growing pains. But in the actual games, the vets don't look like players who have more experience than the rookies. I found that guys like Batherson and Norris were a lot "safer" than guys like Anisimov, Paquette, Stepan, Reilly, etc. Maybe not Stutzle (3 GP, 19 y/o) but he is blue chipper, he will learn fast. Guys like Chlapik, Brown, Brannstrom, Zub have learned through multiple pro seasons. I wouldn't be surprised if they are "safer" than those vets IN NO TIME.
The problem with bringing in young players could be the cost involved if you are benching a bunch of vets with one way contracts making NHL money than bringing up young players who were making AHL money & having to pay them NHL money. That would probably blow their budget, they need to start moving guys out & if you can't trade them waive them, but both things have costs associated with them. How much money plays a part in all this always needs to be considered with this owner.