tbcwpg
Moderator
- Jan 25, 2011
- 16,704
- 20,231
Attendance in NJ is pretty complicated due to both the logistics of being in the NYC metro area and the relative age of the fanbase.
Fortunately NJ doesn't depend on gate revenue. The Devils own Prudential Center so ownership gets a cut from all non-Devils events held there. Owning the arena is where most of the franchise's value comes from, owning the team itself is just a nice perk. They also have a pretty lucrative TV deal.
I get it. I think NJ might not be a great example of this due to those factors you mentioned, but there is a correlation to a team's performance in the standings and the attendance at the rink.
Similarly in Winnipeg, the owners own the arena and get revenue from all events there. They also own a lot of property around the arena and VLTs bring in more revenue, not to mention they get some pretty friendly government regulations on that too (or lack thereof).
Viability of the franchise in both NJ and Winnipeg's case isn't really a question. I think where the league and PA would be concerned is that this extra revenue is not hockey related revenue.
Anyway, I've sidetracked the discussion a bit, but I think my original point is true enough, that fans might get on board with a rebuild if the team needs it but translating that acceptance to fans in the building is another thing entirely.