/60 stats are flawed and even moreso when comparing from different seasons. In their era, Crosby and Malkin put up elite numbers at ES for their era without each other in '08 and '09.
BTW, Malkin was injured in Game 1 of the 2008 ECF. At the time he was leading the playoffs in scoring with 8 goals and 17 points through 10 games (five point shares with Crosby).
Like McDavid, both Crosby and Malkin, when he was healthy, produced regardless of who they are playing with. Draisaitl notably has not put up elite numbers at ES in the playoffs without McDavid.
The 2009 Cup win by the Pens came with arguably the worst supporting cast outside of the top 2 forwards in NHL history. They doubled the next best Pen scorer in both the regular season and in the playoffs.
Like McDavid, both Crosby and Malkin, when he was healthy, produced regardless of who they were playing with. Draisaitl notably has not put up elite numbers at ES in the playoffs without McDavid.
I don't see Draisaitl, at his peak, on Malkin's tier.
I am fully aware of the flaws in using /60 numbers to compare individuals. The main one being that over a season points are not linear in time played. but I not using /60 numbers to evaluate individual scoring rates over a season but rather the team's scoring rate while those players were on the ice. With relatively large sample sizes that major flaws in /60 stats go away in this circumstance. I did this because your claim, which is what I was responding to, was predicated on the production of the pair away from one another being factors in leading the team to success. Individual scoring matters but in the end success of the team comes form how the whole squad performs when they are on the ice.
If Crosby's individual numbers away from Malkin were greater than Draisaitl's away from McDavid, but if the team numbers for the Oilers in this situation were greater than those for the Pens that matters.
The whole 5 vs 5 numbers for an individual away from XXX is extremely complicated. You have to look at who else they played with an how they meshed. For years the Oilers lacked both forward depth and an true offensive defenseman. (The latter being a real key in today's hockey.) For most of his career away from McDavid Draisaitl played with a dog's breakfast of rotating wingers most of whom were third and fourth liners whose career was either ending or never really began.
For example if you look at the years from 2018-2019 through 2020-21 Draisaitl's most common line mates aside from McDavid who he played more than 140 minutes with were in order:
Yamamoto 1020
Kassian 871
Nugent Hopkins 709
Chiasson 671
Kahun 340
Puljujarvi 283
Reider 279
Ganger 141
After that the next five forwards in order were Lucic, Khaira, Caggiula, Archibald.
Kassian's numbers are not so relevant because almost all of the time the spent together was on a line with McDavid. This is true for Lucic as well and to a lesser degree Yamamoto. After these guys it really is a mixture of mutts.
Add in defense, and here are the 9 top guys he played with in order of time on the ice:
Nurse 1550, Larsson 1143, Klefbom 826, Russell 786, Bear 670, Barrie 409, Benning 409, Jones 372, Gravel
Now lets look at Malkin in the 2007-2008 through 2009-2010 period.
Forward other than Crosby with >140 minutes:
Sykora 1228, Fedotenko 946, Malone 555, Dupuis 516, Stall 323, Talbot 278, Cooke 262, Armstrong 214, Guerin 171, Kennedy 164
The one "regular" winger Draisaitl had during this period away from McDavid who was a legitimate top 6 forward was Nugent-Hopkins. With Nugent-Hopkins, Draisaitl scored a 3.38 pts/ 60 rate. Of that group the only guy that Malikn scored at a rate greater than the 3.38 rate Draisaitl had with Nuge was with Guerin at 3.5 over those 171 minutes.
Moreover, when you add in defense the picture becomes clearer:
Orpik 1077, Letang 980, Gonchar 878, Eaton 757, Scuderi 704, Whitney 528, Goligiski 492, Hal Gill 354, Sydor 346
His scoring rates with Whitney, Letang, Gonchar and Sydor were much higher than with guys like Gill, Scuderi and Eaton as one would expect. Similarly Draisaitl's numbers were much better with Barrie (3.37 pts/60) and Nurse (3.25 pts/60) than they were with the Russell and Larsson.
I am not so sure that the narrative that Malkin produced with everyone but Draisaitl didn't has any real basis in fact once you add a little context. The reality is that Draisaitl's individual scoring rate was at least comparable to Malkin's when playing with comparable players.
Here is the other things that needs to be emphasized: The fact that Draisaitl and McDavid are so good together while Crosby and Malkin don't work nearly as well is a testament to Draisaitl's ability to adjust his game to McDavid's style. He should get credit for that, not have his accomplishments diminished for it.