Player Discussion Leo Carlsson

People want to compare Leo to Fantilli, which is normal based on the draft sequence.

My question are we/will we be better with Carlsson and Gauthier or Fantilli and Gauthier?

John
 
People want to compare Leo to Fantilli, which is normal based on the draft sequence.

My question are we/will we be better with Carlsson and Gauthier or Fantilli and Gauthier?

John

The biggest arguments for drafting Carlsson were that he'd be more likely to stick at C which is a more valuable position, and his vision/game sense is very high. I think overall both will be very good players, just of very different types.

My original opinion was that Fantilli fit a bigger need since we were stacked at center, and having a top-line player that is actually a pure shooter would be a better fit overall. Since that draft, I've grown a lot more tepid on our center depth. Neither Zegras nor McTavish have really separated themselves, and as more time goes on I'd peg them more as 2C/3C tweeners than truly elite talent. So having Carlsson with 1C potential is now pretty important for the future of our franchise.
 
The biggest arguments for drafting Carlsson were that he'd be more likely to stick at C which is a more valuable position, and his vision/game sense is very high. I think overall both will be very good players, just of very different types.

My original opinion was that Fantilli fit a bigger need since we were stacked at center, and having a top-line player that is actually a pure shooter would be a better fit overall. Since that draft, I've grown a lot more tepid on our center depth. Neither Zegras nor McTavish have really separated themselves, and as more time goes on I'd peg them more as 2C/3C tweeners than truly elite talent. So having Carlsson with 1C potential is now pretty important for the future of our franchise.
Well said
 

Ad

Ad