can you clarify what the sticking point has been. Isn't whoever wins the bid paying for it? Euge and Rudy would have had some internal "how do we finance this thing", but they were paying for it. I can imagine a ticket surcharge for sens games. As far as I recall, all the bidders who took part indicated no public money was included in their plans.
Because you are wrong. Why do you mention 50/50 ticketsback to my original point - a sellout at the Sens game generate about $2 million in revenue. people can do their own calculations but it adds up if you can do basic addition and multiplication.
some tickets cost $150, some people buy 6 beers, some people buy 3 hot dogs and nachos and a hat, some spend $40 on 50/50 tickets and some people take the bus and buy a Coca-Cola seat for $25 and don’t buy anything - but it all comes back if the team sells out it generates about $2 million in revenue on average.
why is this so hard for anyone to reason with?
I think you can eliminate any majority owner with less than a billion dollars in wealth. Going from memory, Melnyk's wealth was/is about $2 billion, and we was listed as one of the poorest owners in an article that I saw when this subject was being discussed before. I'm just focusing on the basic concept versus (niggly) details as I don't think this topic warrants much research.Bieber is not buying the sens lol.
But in relevant news Alfie was in the building....
concessions are run by a different entity, we don’t get that amount.ticket $70
Parking - $15
Beer -$15
That’s $100. We are talking revenues not profit.
You buy a hotdog and beer at the game and that’s $25. You park it’s $15. You buy a T-shirt it’s $30. A slice of pizza is $8. 50/50 draw. Advertising. Promotion.
This is honestly grade 2 math you are arguing over here. Get a pen, write down how much it would cost you to buy a ticket, park, buy a beer and a hot dog and give me that number. This is how you calculate revenues. Now multiply that by 18 500 and you be close to $2 million.
Again, your making false assumptions, start with garbage data and you'll inevitably end up with garbage conclusions.back to my original point - a sellout at the Sens game generate about $2 million in revenue. people can do their own calculations but it adds up if you can do basic addition and multiplication.
some tickets cost $150, some people buy 6 beers, some people buy 3 hot dogs and nachos and a hat, some spend $40 on 50/50 tickets and some people take the bus and buy a Coca-Cola seat for $25 and don’t buy anything - but it all comes back if the team sells out it generates about $2 million in revenue on average.
why is this so hard for anyone to reason with?
I mean in order to be really successful as a team, the owner needs to basically be rich enough to just treat the team like a fun toy. And at a value of $600-700 million, the Sens would’ve been 1/4 of Melnyk’s entire net worth. I mean imagine buying a car that’s worth 1/4 of your entire net worth (yes I know a car is a depreciating asset blah blah blah). It’s no wonder he could barely afford to keep the thing runningI think you can eliminate any majority owner with less than a billion dollars in wealth. Going from memory, Melnyk's wealth was/is about $2 billion, and we was listed as one of the poorest owners in an article that I saw when this subject was being discussed before. I'm just focusing on the basic concept versus (niggly) details as I don't think this topic warrants much research.
source: The Financial State of the Ottawa Senatorsticket $70
Parking - $15
Beer -$15
That’s $100. We are talking revenues not profit.
You buy a hotdog and beer at the game and that’s $25. You park it’s $15. You buy a T-shirt it’s $30. A slice of pizza is $8. 50/50 draw. Advertising. Promotion.
This is honestly grade 2 math you are arguing over here. Get a pen, write down how much it would cost you to buy a ticket, park, buy a beer and a hot dog and give me that number. This is how you calculate revenues. Now multiply that by 18 500 and you be close to $2 million.
for sure. I did note the toxic cleanup in response to someone else here.It was already agreed upon that public money was being put into the cleanup of all the toxic land. That alone could end up being one hell of a discount.
I don't think that's true.I mean in order to be really successful as a team, the owner needs to basically be rich enough to just treat the team like a fun toy. And at a value of $600-700 million, the Sens would’ve been 1/4 of Melnyk’s entire net worth. I mean imagine buying a car that’s worth 1/4 of your entire net worth (yes I know a car is a depreciating asset blah blah blah). It’s no wonder he could barely afford to keep the thing running
Again, your making false assumptions, start with garbage data and you'll inevitably end up with garbage conclusions.
I don't think that's true.
Look at Vinnik. He has less money than EM had. Dundon just over a billion. Lot's of owners are not loaded and can run successful small market teams.
You just have to be good at business and hockey ops. Look at the financial statement. It basically says that the sens can run profitably somewhere in the middle of the cap if you remove the team debt.
And then you just have to invest smart. Invest in the right players, get playoff return, invest in marketing - see gate return, invest in new stadium - see valuation return.
All of these returns depend on the right investments, not money. If you need more money you can take on partners who also want to get in on the return. We don't need a rich owner, we need a smart owner, who is willing to take on risk AND/OR minority partners.
Melnyk’s net worth was around $1B - not $2B.I think you can eliminate any majority owner with less than a billion dollars in wealth. Going from memory, Melnyk's wealth was/is about $2 billion, and we was listed as one of the poorest owners in an article that I saw when this subject was being discussed before. I'm just focusing on the basic concept versus (niggly) details as I don't think this topic warrants much research.
Melnyk’s net worth was around $1B - not $2B.I think you can eliminate any majority owner with less than a billion dollars in wealth. Going from memory, Melnyk's wealth was/is about $2 billion, and we was listed as one of the poorest owners in an article that I saw when this subject was being discussed before. I'm just focusing on the basic concept versus (niggly) details as I don't think this topic warrants much research.
Melnyk’s net worth was around $1B - not $2B.
However, the bigger thing is to have an owner (or owners) who have other massive sources of revenues where they aren’t relying on their sports franchise to keep them afloat. Melnyk was no longer in this position once BioVail went down the drain and he became cheap once that company was out of the picture. He no longer had another major source of revenue and could no longer blow money on his sports club.
C'mon. In your own example he's not spending more on his team than most owners. He's taking more of a loss, sure, if we accept your base numbers as fact (which, for the record, I don't.) But that's not even the premise as you lay it out.Melynk loses (spends) money on the team then most owners.
One owner has $175 million of revenue and spends $165 on the team picketing $10.. the o bet has $110 of revenue and spends $120 losing $10. Who spends more of their money?
Just take a look at annual operating income - that’s all I’m using.C'mon. In your own example he's not spending more on his team than most owners. He's taking more of a loss, sure, if we accept your base numbers as fact (which, for the record, I don't.) But that's not even the premise as you lay it out.
You're using "lose" and "spend" as interchangeable when they're not.Just take a look at annual operating income - that’s all I’m using.
The habs are guilty of pocketing a tonne of cash of sub cap spending the past few years before Covid.
I think a sub cap team with $200 in revenue is “cheaper” than a sub cap team with $110 in revenue. Keep in mind our revenue numbers are inflated with league handouts too.
“Spending” and “losing” are not interchangeable lolMelynk loses (spends) more money on the team then most owners.
One owner has $175 million of revenue and spends $165 on the team pocketing $10.. the other has $110 of revenue and spends $120 losing $10. Who spends more of their money?
You're using "lose" and "spend" as interchangeable when they're not.
Jus look at Beech’s financial statement, it’s all right there including, one year showing expansion revenue and one playoff revenue. $12 million a year in interest on debt as well.So if the Sens have 18500 fans for a sellout how much revenue do they generate? Show me your elite numbers
According to Shawn Simpson who got the information from a Sens source who works for the team - it’s about $2 million. That’s why the $10 million for 5 games in QC City was the talking point last week
Bieber is not buying the sens lol.
But in relevant news Alfie was in the building....