thusk
Registered User
Loved what he brought on paper but I was put off by his age, injury history, and contract.
You now last 4 years amount actual leafs top 5 D, only Carlo missed less game than Tanev for injury?
Loved what he brought on paper but I was put off by his age, injury history, and contract.
Putting the best team out there would be a lot more brilliant.It is brilliant. He often scores after he sits.
I guess you are right. He has not been a liability on that side of the puck. Just feels like he is out there working so hard accomplishing nothing. I would say though, if him being in means we give up less, then that is probably the way to go. I've just not been enamoured with him since his return.I thought Jarnkrok has been looking good defensively. I wonder who the black aces will be.
11 last year.So 12 guys have had a fight this year. Anyone know what it was last year?
11 different guys fought last year?11 last year.
Hard to argue with that.I'd ask for Laughton to play much better than he is currently. Sucks to see him struggle here while Mintin played his first game with the Bruins tonight and fans seemed to think he didn't look out of place in his first game with the Bs.
Still maintain that Brad shouldn't have traded him and simply played him with the Leafs or just bring up Steeves and save ourselves a 1st and a good prospect and just trade Grebenkin and a 1st for Carlo.
Does Patches get in ? If so Laughton should be scratched. In fact, based on his play to this point there’s no reason to have him in the starting lineup for game one other than it makes it look like a terrible trade with the Flyers.I thought Jarnkrok has been looking good defensively. I wonder who the black aces will be.
I assume we go with Laughton because of the price paid but if we get in a bind and get down... Patches comes in and loyalty to bad players should go out the windowDoes Patches get in ? If so Laughton should be scratched. In fact, based on his play to this point there’s no reason to have him in the starting lineup for game one other than it makes it look like a terrible trade with the Flyers.
Going strictly by major penalties taken, so they may not have been 'fights':11 different guys fought last year?
I didn’t think it was that many.
I would try and see if the Bruins wouldn't accept a 1st, Grebenkin and maybe another pick or two rather than give up Minten who can fill a need for the Leafs for the future and even maybe right now if given the chance. As I said in a previous post give Minten a run of games and see if he's ready or why not give Steeves a shot who has looked good this year and has already been in our organization for a few years and hasn't ever got a long look with the Leafs either.He hasn’t been good but probably zero chance you can subs grebs for Minten in the Carlo deal. Bruins had a target there for sure and Minten is a better prospect. Doubt Tre would have made the same deal for Laughton if it had to be Minten. Probably could have gotten more regardless though.
Of course, the coach chooses the team that he thinks is best.Putting the best team out there would be a lot more brilliant.
Save him for game 7 then unleash him on the unsuspecting opponentMaybe the plan should be sit Robbie for two games and then play him again.
Lol