DarkKnight
Professional Amateur
- Jan 17, 2017
- 31,933
- 60,554
Considering last year we were devastated he couldn't play, I'll say yes. I'm worried what's behind him.Are you confident with Woll being the starter for a while?
Considering last year we were devastated he couldn't play, I'll say yes. I'm worried what's behind him.Are you confident with Woll being the starter for a while?
Are you confident with Woll being the starter for a while?
Woll is a good goalie, but now Hildeby is the backup and that could be a problem.Considering last year we were devastated he couldn't play, I'll say yes. I'm worried what's behind him.
Pretty sure Florida takes the Stolarz for Bennett trade, that's what pisses me off. No matter what happens Florida comes out ahead in the trade off because they took out our best player.I know it won't happen, but in my wildest dreams, Reaves plays in Game 2 but not for long. The second Bennett hits the ice Reaves goes out, there's no talking, no waiting for gloves to drop, he just grabs Bennett and starts pummeling him into next week, if the dirty rat hits his head on the ice and gets a concussion ala George Parros oh well. Reaves gets tossed and a long suspension, Marner and Nylander double shift when needed the rest of the game. We lose Reaves for the playoffs, nobody cares. Bennett has to join Stolarz on the sidelines and eat through a straw just like he deserves.
Not true but if bennett is missing for an extended period they will feel it make no mistake it would be nice to go up 2 heading to floridaPretty sure Florida takes the Stolarz for Bennett trade, that's what pisses me off. No matter what happens Florida comes out ahead in the trade off because they took out our best player.
They were awful last night - Laughton in particular, was a bit of a headless chicken in his own zone.2- The lorentz-Laughton-Jarnkrok line will need to be better... both 2nd and 3rd goal, they missed their coverage and didn't look good at all an will need to step up
Did Bennett get hurt? Because at most he'll miss a game or two by suspension and that'll be unusual luck for usNot true but if bennett is missing for an extended period they will feel it make no mistake it would be nice to go up 2 heading to florida
Two games is good enough wouldn’t you say?i wouldn’t mind more but I wouldn’t complain with 2Did Bennett get hurt? Because at most he'll miss a game or two by suspension and that'll be unusual luck for us
Really depends how long does is out for a "trade scenario"Two games is good enough wouldn’t you say?i wouldn’t mind more but I wouldn’t complain with 2
Wasn't dangerous, but was bush league. Looked like he was chasing to high trip himI know we're all rightly wanting to see Bennett get some suspension, but f*** me that's some kind of dangerous bullshit Tkachuk tried with Marner, what a garbage move.
This league needs to step in, this team thinks they can do whatever they want and that's one THEM.
Wasn't dangerous? He's stalking him from behind and Marner is loose, the game is over?Wasn't dangerous, but was bush league. Looked like he was chasing to high trip him
Wasn't dangerous? He's stalking him from behind and Marner is loose, the game is over?
He's going to cross check him from behind? After the game?What is Marner in danger of there? What do you think the risky outcome is?
Bush league and stupid, but not all that dangerous
I don't really consider an open ice cross check on a player skating away "dangerous".He's going to cross check him from behind? After the game?
A slew foot attempt followed by that, the definition of dangerous. Not sure why we're even debating that. Too each his own.I don't really consider an open ice cross check on a player skating away "dangerous".
Again, stupid, uncalled for, unnecessary and idiotic, but I don't see this as all that dangerous. It's not likely to result in injury or severe harm
What's the outcome you're severely concerned about there? A bruise?
I don't really consider an open ice cross check on a player skating away "dangerous".
Again, stupid, uncalled for, unnecessary and idiotic, but I don't see this as all that dangerous. It's not likely to result in injury or severe harm
What's the outcome you're severely concerned about there? A bruise?
I mean definitely nitpicking here. I never said they played bad or awful, but they didn't have to carry the team on the scoresheet and we still won. I meant it as a good thing for the team. They were great defensively.These takes are insane.
Matthews and Marner were put on the Barkov assignment tonight.
Chances For Chances Against Goal For Goals Against xGF xGA HDCF HDCA Matthews 31 20 2 0 2.49 .49 8 2 Marner 30 26 2 1 2.39 .57 7 2 Nylander 26 23 3 1 1.66 .63 7 5 Knies 22 21 2 0 1.68 .65 5 4 Barkov 32 19 2 2 1.15 1.46 6 5 Tkachuck 28 9 2 0 1.02 .48 6 2 Reinhart 35 20 2 3 1.25 1.51 3 2
Yeah, IMO it was the missed slew foot that was dangerous. Marner had good instincts to avoid it.A slew foot attempt followed by that, the definition of dangerous. Not sure why we're even debating that. Too each his own.
I think with being up early as a line they focused more on being responsible (which they were) than pressing for offense.I mean definitely nitpicking here. I never said they played bad or awful, but they didn't have to carry the team on the scoresheet and we still won. I meant it as a good thing for the team. They were great defensively.
Regardless, if we wanna get into it. Your 13 million dollar center needs to score. End of story. Don't care how great you're on shutting down the opposition, put the puck in the bloody net. It's fine when you're ahead, just wait until we're behind.