Post-Game Talk: Leafs win 5-3 against the Stars

All Mod Cons

Registered User
Sep 7, 2018
11,595
12,550
Top 5 forwards for 5v5 xGF% from the game:

1. Reaves
2. Matthews
3. Knies
4. Marner
5. Nylander

Top Leafs line (by a mile):

Marner-Matthews-Nylander

I love it when the fancy stats dont match what most people saw lol.
Look fine with me. Seeing Reavo at the top makes sense. That's why i love fancy stats and put a lot of stock into them.
 

TMLBlueandWhite

Knies Is The Next Hyman But Better
Feb 2, 2023
2,100
2,152
In any one game that would be true, however they haven’t been playing well lately and have been bailed out by goaltending all season. Goaltenders are a part of the team so there’s no shame in that, but if you look at the Bruins the two season prior to this, relying on them is not the ideal recipe.

They're doing a lot better than I thought they would.

Which is also a lot better than they were doing last year at this point. They're clearly gonna make the playoffs again. Who they face, and what happens when they get there, is all that's left to he answered now.

I don't care where they end up in the standings if they can't win anything in the playoffs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Suntouchable13

DarkKnight

Professional Amateur
Jan 17, 2017
34,565
55,282
Top 5 forwards for 5v5 xGF% from the game:

1. Reaves
2. Matthews
3. Knies
4. Marner
5. Nylander

Top Leafs line (by a mile):

Marner-Matthews-Nylander

I love it when the fancy stats dont match what most people saw lol.
Interesting that nobody on third line there, literally ever one represented but the best. Weird.
 

weems

Registered User
Jul 3, 2008
18,729
13,195
What's his shooting percentage this year compared to his career?

Screenshot (1639).png
 
  • Like
Reactions: SprDaVE

CabanaBoy5

Registered User
Feb 17, 2013
3,808
4,439
Woodbridge
Top 5 forwards for 5v5 xGF% from the game:

1. Reaves
2. Matthews
3. Knies
4. Marner
5. Nylander

Top Leafs line (by a mile):

Marner-Matthews-Nylander

I love it when the fancy stats dont match what most people saw lol.
This is hilarious. Reaves on top of an offensive stat? Either the stat is useless, the eyetest is useless, it's an aberration, or Reaves is a star and we all don't know it. If this is true, I vote the stat is useless.
 

GoonieFace

Registered User
Jun 24, 2013
8,131
8,495
The Matrix
This is hilarious. Reaves on top of an offensive stat? Either the stat is useless, the eyetest is useless, it's an aberration, or Reaves is a star and we all don't know it. If this is true, I vote the stat is useless.
Advanced stats for hockey are sketchy at best. This is just clear proof of that.
 

TMLBlueandWhite

Knies Is The Next Hyman But Better
Feb 2, 2023
2,100
2,152
This is hilarious. Reaves on top of an offensive stat? Either the stat is useless, the eyetest is useless, it's an aberration, or Reaves is a star and we all don't know it. If this is true, I vote the stat is useless.

Considering his two linemates were at the very bottom of the list I'd say there was something weird going on with how these stats were being calculated.
 

Fogelhund

Registered User
Sep 15, 2007
23,784
28,370
This is hilarious. Reaves on top of an offensive stat? Either the stat is useless, the eyetest is useless, it's an aberration, or Reaves is a star and we all don't know it. If this is true, I vote the stat is useless.
Or it's one game, and we don't read too much into it.

Reaves was on ice for 9 shots attempts for, and 7 shot attempts against. If you are on ice, for more net shot attempts for, than anyone else, you kind of would expect your xGoals % to be higher than anyone else... that's just reality... what xGoals% doesn't take into consideration, is the quality of the player taking those shots. (5v5)

This doesn't make him a star, or even a good hockey player... it just means, last night, while he was on the ice, we directed more pucks on the opposition goalie, than were directed at ours... and the expectation, is we are more likely to score more goals than the opposition, when we do so.

This doesn't mean that stats are useless, it just means people don't understand them, or use them in the proper context.

Considering his two linemates were at the very bottom of the list I'd say there was something weird going on with how these stats were being calculated.
No... it means you made assumptions that aren't based on anything at all. Look at the actual stats, it makes sense. Noting... he didn't play exclusively with Lorentz and Kampf.
 
  • Like
Reactions: leafsfan5

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
81,952
60,000
McCabe has been awesome this season and our best defencemen.

McCabe used to have a bit of a reputation for making some low IQ brain fart plays in Buffalo but he’s just been dialled in as a Leaf. So good and brings that alpha control tower aspect to the blueline. The ice mic picked up McCabe behind the net telling Domi or someone to “stay there” on the half wall before confidently skating up himself. Beast.
 
Oct 15, 2014
12,755
12,290
The Duke's Archives
I was just on NHL.com, and when Dallas scored it was Dallas crew, and when Leafs scored it was the Leafs crew.
Or do you mean YouTube will have those highlights, from home crew?

Yep YouTube will have them on the main NHL channel.

Here's last night with the Stars crew. It's always either the local home team broadcast or national (ESPN, Prime)

 
  • Like
Reactions: ULF_55

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad