If he's a genius this year, what does that say about the year before?
Fair enough. All I can really say to that is the pathway to the ultimate prize is not always linear. In fact, it rarely is.
It's a never-ending cycle of predicting, doing, and verifying. Sometimes predictions on players don't verify well in the long run. We've seen this outcome several times with respect to Dubas acquisitions. Ritchie, Mrazek, NAK to name a few.
the one thing we have to remember is that we have to work within a strict salary cap and on what players become available and when they become available to us. Case in point being TJ Brodie. That was a player we wanted to acquire 1 year prior to actually getting him. The means to make that happen just did not materialize until the year following.
Not every decision will pan out, and some take longer to materialize then others. My assumption is that given our tight cap structure, and Jack's ability to step up when called upon, lead us to the inevitable decision to have him go into the 2021-22 season as our 1A. The reason we likely did not extend Jack in the summer of 2021 and in turn signed Mrazek to share the blue paint was just more of an indication of what management likely felt about Jack being our long-term option in the crease. That said, I don't feel like they were close minded to the idea of him taking the net over, but they weren't 100% confident in that outcome, and insulated him with Mrazek as a result. Same could be said this season with respect to both Murr and Sammy. I really don't think Kyle could honestly say he had full confidence that either 1 of Murr or Sammy was going to emerge as a true #1, but there were key indicators available to suggest that one, or both
could do just that. Given that both Murr and Sammy did not require a long-term commitment and Jack did, the decision to move on was pretty obvious.
For the record, I do consider Jack to be a quality goalie, and I think he also presented that same probability to become our answer as both Murr and Sammy pre-season. But when dissecting the AAV's its very clear what the responsible/wise decision was this offseason.
Removing all results from this season from our memories, which would heavily skew this logic into Dubas' favor
Murray @ 4.87AAV x 2 years + Samsonov 1.8AAV x 1 year (RFA)
Total AVV: 6.67AAV
is far better asset management over
Campbell @ 5AAV x 5 years
All 3 goalies presented relatively the same risk/reward IMO, but only 1 of the goalies required a long-term commitment. Not to mention it would have inhibited our ability to properly insulate Jack with a capable 1B if we signed him to that deal.
I won't be the guy to defend every decision and outcome from Dubas' tenure. He's had plenty of successes and failures. But there usually a logic behind every decision he makes, and it usually is not short sighted.