ACC1224
Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
- Aug 19, 2002
- 76,258
- 42,626
Good they moved on before he fell further down the depth chart.
I don’t see it, I think both are serviceable bottom 6 D men, Benny’s had some bad luck with penalties and for the one game Myers played he didn’t look that bad, but I not a stat nerd, I just watch them play and they’re acceptable as a bottom pairing imo. Timmins is a fringe guy who’s defensive abilities are suspect, I’d rather the bottom pairing be a shut down team, could care less about any offensive abilities………Myers looked almost as overmatched with the Leafs as Benoit.
Keystone cops level.
His Corsi isn’t great. In the low 40s in Nashville and high 30s in SJ.Just that when he is on the ice, the team is driving play more than when he is off the ice, still not good numbers, just better than his teammates.
But in reality he has been scored on a lot and hasn't helped offensively.
He has the worst PDO on his team (.903).
On ice shooting % is 2.56%, the sv% when he is on the ice is .877%.
For reference, I think Nylander has been fortunate this year, his PDO is 1.114, his on ice shooting % is 16.67% and his on ice sv% is .947%.
I don't know how good he's actually been playing, but the numbers suggest better than the results.
I don't think it has to do with having bad taste in d-man (well it does a little), but if you're playing in the 5-6 hole, you got to be able to kill pens and be effective in your own zone. Lillypad didn't do either of that. That was problem #1. I do agree signing players like Giordano to play over him was a mistake.That really says more about Keefe and Berube having atrocious taste in defensemen than anything else. People want to know why we can't develop D? It's because the organization always signs too many bottom pairing level guys and will give said veterans who are underperforming much more rope than their own young and home grown players. The fact that Liljegren last year was scratched for Ilya Lyubushkin towards the end of the season despite playing fantastic hockey for most of his games last year tells you all need to know. Management bet big on skill in the early days of the Matthews era, didn't get immediate results and have now swung the pendulum too far in the other direction where we now don't have enough skill on the backend and too much physicality. I guarantee you a pairing consisting of 2 of Benoit, Hakanpaa or Myers will be one of the worst in the NHL.
Happy for Timmy. I still believe he has the skillset to be an everyday top-4 defensemen in the league. We were never really in a position to let Timmy learn on the job and help gain his confidence that way. He is the type of player that needs to be afforded a bit of a leash to truly untap his full potential.
Not thrilled with the return, although it is likely fair given his cap hit at this point. Overall, just poor asset management by Brad IMO. This move needed to be made during the offseason, when we could have at least played to the illusion of him being an everyday D-man. Signing him to a 3Mill ticket and then shelfing him was never really going to get us a high return.
But nonetheless, I am just happy Timmy is going to get a fair shake somewhere else.
All the best
Leaf have a bad habit of shopping players and when no one bites they sign them to overblown contracts, luckily Tre was able to move this mistake, Styles not so much……..It seems to be accepted as fact that Tre tried to move him in the off-season and there wasn't any real interest in him.
It seems to me like what happened here was BT tried to move him in the off-season and there were no takers with his uneven development curve, being scratched in the playoffs, age, and RFA status being the reasons why.
So, Brad signed him hoping that maybe the new coach could get different results and if not, he would trade him for the underwhelming return in season. The two year deal he signed was designed to be moved, being so front loaded.
I think BT and the Leafs did OK here. It's not a great return, but he is not a great asset.
Ya there is an element of truth to what you say for sure. I think I have been historically more bullish on Timmy over the years. Sure there are flaws to his game, but all of which were manageable in there current state, and IMO were entirely mental.It seems to be accepted as fact that Tre tried to move him in the off-season and there wasn't any real interest in him.
It seems to me like what happened here was BT tried to move him in the off-season and there were no takers with his uneven development curve, being scratched in the playoffs, age, and RFA status being the reasons why.
So, Brad signed him hoping that maybe the new coach could get different results and if not, he would trade him for the underwhelming return in season. The two year deal he signed was designed to be moved, being so front loaded.
I think BT and the Leafs did OK here. It's not a great return, but he is not a great asset.
Feels like such a waste
We had balance and a happy medium back then. The issue was some people didn't want actual balance. They refused to accept anything other than a team full of 20 Charas, and a time machine to go back to the 80s.I think there should be a happy medium when it comes to betting on skill, in Dubas days there wasn't enough balance on the roster.
Do the Marlies not have too many D bodies too?
I would argue that playing bad, playing worse in the playoffs, and being untalented hurts your overall value.Liljegren is an NHL player, and contracts and not playing absolutely impact trade value.
If you think he's bad, then his value was further tanked by Treliving signing him to a 3m contract.I would argue that playing bad, playing worse in the playoffs, and being untalented hurts your overall value.
Although I am willing to admit, Kyle Dubas' draft record may not be as fruitful as I once thought it would be, I still believe in the principle of drafting skill over athletic profile.Unfortunately it's a reminder in a way that the Leafs early drafting during the rebuild really didn't work out for the team.
For the first few drafts of the rebuild so far we only have like Woll and Holmberg as non-1st round picks turned players
I hope so, I'm not a fan of his game at all.How hard can that be? Timmins next D on the trading block………
This was an amazing example of horrendous asset management.
Berube being critical of Lily and not playing him tanked his value.
Treliving is an idiot for not telling Berube to play him so that he could be moved for a proper asset.
Benning is another (injured) 7th defenceman.
oh well.
may have been injured, had major surgery December 2023, lets hope he can recover faster than Haakanslash.
Mirtle said the same thing last night. He asked around the league at the draft and there wasn't much interest in him. Go back to when the Kings balked at him in a trade, we've over inflated this guy's worth for years.It seems to be accepted as fact that Tre tried to move him in the off-season and there wasn't any real interest in him.
It seems to me like what happened here was BT tried to move him in the off-season and there were no takers with his uneven development curve, being scratched in the playoffs, age, and RFA status being the reasons why.
So, Brad signed him hoping that maybe the new coach could get different results and if not, he would trade him for the underwhelming return in season. The two year deal he signed was designed to be moved, being so front loaded.
I think BT and the Leafs did OK here. It's not a great return, but he is not a great asset.