Gabriel426
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2015
- 18,099
- 11,754
I can see that but having Calle with JT and MM give them more defensive optionMight be interesting to swap McMann and Jarnkrok - the three 'Swedes' together and McMann on the slower line.
I can see that but having Calle with JT and MM give them more defensive optionMight be interesting to swap McMann and Jarnkrok - the three 'Swedes' together and McMann on the slower line.
I totally agree with your analysis, that’s why you make 2 second lines. One with Marner, Tavares ,McMannI feel like when I do this Marner doesn’t fit anywhere except on JTs wing and I don’t want JT in the top 6.
It’s obvious Marner and Matthews don’t play well together as their game devolves into a prissy ballerina game. And Marner can’t play in the bottom 6 because we have no one better. And we have no one good enough to play 2C unless we try Willy but I cringe at the thought of Willy and Marner on the same line.
No, there's are still some pretty big questions/issues.I may be in the minority but I can’t wrap my head around any combination of what we have looking like a cup contending team….
If he's playing with Marner, does JT really need Jarnkrok's defensive help too?I can see that but having Calle with JT and MM give them more defensive option
Not bad, but I think Willy is more suited to play centre than Mitch.As it stands... a combination of what I would like to see (at least tried) + what I expect.
Knies - Matthews - Domi
Holmberg - Marner - Nylander
Cowan/Jarnkronk - Tavares - McMann
Dewar - Kampf - Reaves/???
Rielly - Tanev
OEL - Liljegren
Benoit - McCabe
Woll
Stolarz
Not sure why people still have Nylander playing on the third line, he's the 6th highest paid player in the NHL and had 98 points last year. He will be in our top 6 guaranteed as he should be.
Either may work if they were given time to adapt.Not bad, but I think Willy is more suited to play centre than Mitch.
What exactly is the role of a centerman in the defensive zone? He's looking to be the 3rd guy in on board battles. Picking the pocket of the attacker whose battling with a defender. There aren't many players better at that than Nylander. They need to be able to make quick plays in tight areas to move the puck out of the zone.
What actually should be looked at when assessing these things? What makes a good centerman?
I'm not sure he would - Nylander has played more centre, more recently, and against better opposition. He also has a better faceoff %.Either may work if they were given time to adapt.
But given Mitch's defensive game, I think he would take to it quicker. The only issue would be faceoffs, particularly on the left side, which is why I had Holmberg with them.
The fact that he's better at staying in position (covering his point man) shouldn't necessarily be considered a detriment.it's more about positionning/ help the d protecting the front of defensive net( an area nylander avoiding). In a way, center is a kind of 3rd dman.
The fact that he's better at staying in position (covering his point man) shouldn't necessarily be considered a detriment.
They're not the ones there that need defensive help.I can see that but having Calle with JT and MM give them more defensive option
With those assumptions, I would see McMann higher in the lineup and perhaps Cowan and Grebenkin splitting that open winger assignment. Dewar is in as a PKer and fourth liner.Knies-Matthews-Domi
Grebenkin-Tavares-Marner
Cowan-Holmberg-Nylander
McMann-Kampf-Jarnkrok
(Dewar+Lorentz extra Fs)
Rielly-Tanev
Benoit-McCabe
OEL-Liljegren
(Timmins 7D)
Woll
Stolarz
Cap related assumptions with this lineup are the Hakanpaa deal doesn't end up happening, Robertson is willing to holdout in the regular season, Greb (Euro Assignment clause) and Cowan make the team, Lorentz signs for league minimum off his PTO, and Reaves gets traded at the end of training camp like Lafferty last season (because IMO if Kyle Clifford didn't fit Berube's system in St. Louis, I have a hard time believing Reaves will). This roster would be roughly 70k under the cap.
I will give you Nylander avoids contact, he does not however avoid the front of the net.it's more about positionning/ help the d protecting the front of defensive net( an area nylander avoiding). In a way, center is a kind of 3rd dman.
I seriously doubt this point being a possibility. Wasting cap on carrying a 3rd goalie on the opening night roster makes no sense when Hildeby and Akhtyamov could realistically both be viable depth/callup options as well this season.I also wonder about Murray being on the roster. If he has a good camp we could be at risk on losing him on waivers and we do want a third goalie in the system. Lorentz being sent down could be the answer to that.
Nylander hockey IQ is not bad but Marner clearly having the the edge in that part of the game. It's maybe the only area where Marner having an edge over NylanderI will give you Nylander avoids contact, he does not however avoid the front of the net.
This also doesn't really answer the question. Positioning comes down to hockey IQ and knowing where to be. Where the open ice is. Nobody has ever questioned Nylanders IQ.
he maybe play more lower than some winger but again certainly not morw than Marner. NobodyI also find he plays a lot lower then most wingers in the defensive zone,
yes he blows the zone a lot, that is him anticipating a turnover, which works more often than it fails.
Nylanders defensive game is a lot better then what he gets credit for, and a lot of it has to do with playing on the wing. He's better suited as a center.
I understand that. I don't think either kid is ready for any extended role though. We have two goalies that have never combined for 82 games in a season. It's a risk point, if Murray is healthy he will garner interest. Isn't Lorentz the redundant piece that should have no problem clearing waivers?I seriously doubt this point being a possibility. Wasting cap on carrying a 3rd goalie on the opening night roster makes no sense when Hildeby and Akhtyamov could realistically both be viable depth/callup options as well this season.
I seriously doubt this point being a possibility. Wasting cap on carrying a 3rd goalie on the opening night roster makes no sense when Hildeby and Akhtyamov could realistically both be viable depth/callup options as well this season.