Guided by Veseys
Registered User
- Nov 14, 2011
- 3,875
- 3,219
38 milly in earnings ...he will be okI feel for the guy. Left 50 million on the table and now is struggling to move around properly.
This Gustafson nonsense needs to stop. The guy got $825k, so it was quite obvious nobody in the league thought this guy was much of anything
1st place Rangers say hi....12 pts in 17 games +5 for 825kThis Gustafson nonsense needs to stop. The guy got $825k, so it was quite obvious nobody in the league thought this guy was much of anything
This Gustafson nonsense needs to stop. The guy got $825k, so it was quite obvious nobody in the league thought this guy was much of anything
Yeah how much do the Leafs have?I wonder when Toronto will use the additional cap space. Presumably they have to wait until he makes a decision on surgery.
That’s fantastic, it still doesn’t change the fact he got $825 K on a 1 year deal, clearly indicating that nobody thought he was worth much of anything, including the Rangers1st place Rangers say hi....12 pts in 17 games +5 for 825k
I think it would be around $3.75 million (whatever is left on Klingberg's salary this season, I think). What we wouldn't know is whether the player and the team share the same opinion about what should happen next. Maybe Klingberg thinks that he can rest for a couple of months and see if there is sufficient improvement to play rather than undergoing surgery. After all, he has seen what happened with Backstrom after his surgery (assuming, of course, these are similar injuries).Yeah how much do the Leafs have?
No team would give him 850?1st place Rangers say hi....12 pts in 17 games +5 for 825k
Too bad for Klingberg but this is amazing news for the Leafs. It was obvious that Klingberg was not able to contribute to his strengths. He was hurting the Leafs. Now, how do we get rid of that slug Reaves?
Boston is probably looking for a Lucic replacementToo bad for Klingberg but this is amazing news for the Leafs. It was obvious that Klingberg was not able to contribute to his strengths. He was hurting the Leafs. Now, how do we get rid of that slug Reaves?
I can't believe Boston would be that dumb, although, it would be worth the call. My problem with Reaves is that he didn't deliver what he was brought in here for. Klingberg also didn't deliverr on PP1 or his see his alleged good shot but at least he had injuries as an excuse. Reaves, during the first home game introductions, flexed his muscles like Hulk Hogan in his prime, fought his first two games which I liked, then thought he could play NHL hockey after that and the toughness and physicality disappeared.Boston is probably looking for a Lucic replacement
Send him down and just take the $200k cap hitToo bad for Klingberg but this is amazing news for the Leafs. It was obvious that Klingberg was not able to contribute to his strengths. He was hurting the Leafs. Now, how do we get rid of that slug Reaves?
Well they did sign Lucic in the first place……..I can't believe Boston would be that dumb, although, it would be worth the call. My problem with Reaves is that he didn't deliver what he was brought in here for. Klingberg also didn't deliverr on PP1 or his see his alleged good shot but at least he had injuries as an excuse. Reaves, during the first home game introductions, flexed his muscles like Hulk Hogan in his prime, fought his first two games which I liked, then thought he could play NHL hockey after that and the toughness and physicality disappeared.
Must be nice to have 4 million to gamble lolThey took a risk like they did with Murray, knowing that they likely could LTIR him if it didn't work out.
Be careful what you ask forNikita Zadorov, come on down!
As an “insider” this guy brings no value to his reports.
He was Sandin's replacement, but had more NHL experience. Sandin lost his spot when McCabe was acquired, so they just needed a 7D.Not to mention Dubas traded for him and he didn’t play much under Keefe. He was clearly a throw in and the previous front office and coaching staff didn’t see his value and wouldn’t play him.