ULF_55
Moderator
Maybe that will change their luck?I wonder if they give him a training camp number like 67.
Nothing else has.
Maybe that will change their luck?I wonder if they give him a training camp number like 67.
I don’t like this move, maybe he surprises, but seems spent to me.
I'm sorry, I strongly disagree. At that point, it was Reaves job to do something. Anything. It didn't even matter if it was against Marchand, he needed to respond. But, if he wasn't going to fight Marchand, he probably should run him. Make him pay some how. Who cares about a suspension, be a deterrent. Someone needed to go after Marchand. Maybe it didn't need to be Reaves, but someone had to. That was a complete failure by Reaves, by Keefe and by the whole team.Reeves is not going to go after a guy like Marchand - that was the job of guys like Bertuzzi and Domi. Reeves is there to keep the opponent's big/tough guys in check, which I think he did fine last year, though my opinion is as anecdotal as yours on that front.
He's not the type of guy you play in the playoffs, but in the regular season, he's useful. You can also sit him against teams that don't have much of a physical presence, like the Canes.
He had a bad start for us last year, but in the 2nd half he contributed nicely. Mind you, he's 37 so he may be done as well.
I think Keefe put a leash on the team. At least I hope that was the case.I'm sorry, I strongly disagree. At that point, it was Reaves job to do something. Anything. It didn't even matter if it was against Marchand, he needed to respond. Not only that, someone needed to go after Marchand. Maybe it didn't need to be Reaves, but someone had to. That was a complete failure by Reaves, by Keefe and by the whole team.
...and if Reaves can't go after the person who injured our player, if such opposition players know that... what is he deterring them from?
Maybe that was the case. But why have a Reaves, if you've got a leash on them?I think Keefe put a leash on the team. At least I hope that was the case.
Hope the other team doesn’t find out?Maybe that was the case. But why have a Reaves, if you've got a leash on them?
We should had made him Capt, lol
Rather try the kids one-by-one.
If Cowan doesn't stick, try Grebenkin, if he doesn't stick, try Minten, if he doesn't stick try Quillan, if he doesn't stick ...
So that's about 40 games into the season, then try Grebenkin again, rinse and repeat.
They'll make the playoffs with or without Pacioretty.
In the meantime they've invested into their future rather than someone else's past.
If he's signed for more than 1 season, I won't like it. If on a league min for 1 year what could be the harm? I see the concern, but who knows?I don’t like this move, maybe he surprises, but seems spent to me.
They need to be better than the old guys on pto in camp.I hate this idea...how does Robertson, Mintin etc get developed when old slow, weak guys get ice time. Even Montreal didn't want him.
Let's sign Gio too. Maybe Mats could be our 3C
With two Achilles tears. That player is not who the leafs expect right now. By all accounts he is healthy now, which makes a big difference. Similar to OEL before signing in FLA a year ago.4 goals in 47 games last year
Reaves had 4 goals in 49 games
If it’s a PTO, there is literally no risk.Patches hasn't played a full season in 4 years. I don't expect 82 from him, but I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.
Ugh...again. Only at league min.
Reeks of Marleau and cheddar
If we have to move someone to make room for him, that could be a cost. It could work out, I’m just not feeling it.If he's signed for more than 1 season, I won't like it. If on a league min for 1 year what could be the harm? I see the concern, but who knows?
Worked on me. Already bought my Patches jersey.Leafs only care out selling jerseys that's why