LEAFANFORLIFE23
Registered User
- Jun 17, 2010
- 47,391
- 16,031
He’s moving better than years before. He’ll get a few cookies, but defensive game is NOT good.
He wasn't brought here for defense
He’s moving better than years before. He’ll get a few cookies, but defensive game is NOT good.
I don't understand this signing.
Is it just so they can have an OGWAC on the team again. I'm sick of seeing them bring in vets who can't contribute anything other than being a positive locker room presence. How about getting vets who are good in the room AND on the ice.
A better idea would be to give the kids an opportunity.
They need more room for growth from young players. All these vets with one foot out the door have no business playing large roles on this team. Like when they signed Thornton it wasn't the dumbest move they could've made.
Playing him on the top line was.
Thornton was given a position he neither earned through his play or deserved through entitlement. An enviable reward for a long illustrious career playing for teams not named the Toronto Maple Leafs. I expect Pacioretty to be given similar red carpet treatment.
Another Leafs sales job on a player on his way out of the NHL.
Ya, well it’s like the kid on my son’s hockey team.He wasn't brought here for defense
Ya, well it’s like the kid on my son’s hockey team.
This kid plays great offense, scores 2 goals - often highlight reel. I’m positive he has a nice car ride home remembering his goals with his folks. At the same time, having no clue that being on the ice for four goals costs the team. Turning the puck over and over again does not justify your 2 goals.
This mindset on the Leafs also has to go.
Habs fans were claiming Pacioretty was one of the better defensive wingers in the NHL a few seasons ago.Pacioretty has literally NEVER been in The league for defense.
Every team has players that are pure offense.
Every team has players that are pure defense
Every team has players that give you both.
You aren't getting defense from everybody.
Yup Patches was a respectable 2-way forward in his prime with the Habs. Injuries have slowed him down now so he may as well focus on his biggest advantage which is still his lethal shot. Bigger concern for me is that he's historically not a very good playoff performer, so I wonder how much he moves the needle there, though his numbers with Vegas were respectable.Habs fans were claiming Pacioretty was one of the better defensive wingers in the NHL a few seasons ago.
He’s older now but I don’t view his defence as a problem at all.
He’s probably one of those players you sign to help you get through the grunt of an 82 game regular season but ultimately doesn’t make the playoff roster, especially if they pick up a meaningful player or two at the deadline.Yup Patches was a respectable 2-way forward in his prime with the Habs. Injuries have slowed him down now so he may as well focus on his biggest advantage which is still his lethal shot. Bigger concern for me is that he's historically not a very good playoff performer, so I wonder how much he moves the needle there, though his numbers with Vegas were respectable.
Leafs are one of the last teams in the league that need regular season help lol. Playoff spot clinched by end of November.He’s probably one of those players you sign to help you get through the grunt of an 82 game regular season but ultimately doesn’t make the playoff roster, especially if they pick up a meaningful player or two at the deadline.
He could prove that thesis wrong though with a good season.
Has he made the team? If so, why?In order for this to be true Pacioretty would have to not make the team.
He wasn't brought here for defense
I’d hardly call him a defensive liability.We have too many already here that we’re not brought in for defense. He will be another old slow defensive liability that will have a hard time skating with the top six. If you have him on the 3rd line then you have to shelter him because of his defensive liability and his lack of speed.
I have to hope that Leafs' management knows a lot more about hockey than I do, because I'm with you here.Not a fan of signing another old slow player that is a liability on defence. Tre is doing the same crap all our other GMs did.
We should be getting faster and younger but we are getting slower and older.
Did Patch show enough? IMHO he didn’t and it wasn’t even close. I don’t care how low Patch salary is…it’s the roster spot he is taking. We have already Reaves who is a one trick pony that has to be sheltered and is terrible defensively and offers no offence.
Oh wait…he gets a clean slate because he showed up last night.
Imagine if we gave all our players a clean slate every few months because he makes one check or scores 1 goal.
Back to Patch…..if we didn’t sign him he would be sitting on the sidelines like Kessel begging teams to sign him
Habs fans were claiming Pacioretty was one of the better defensive wingers in the NHL a few seasons ago.
He’s older now but I don’t view his defence as a problem at all.
We have too many already here that we’re not brought in for defense. He will be another old slow defensive liability that will have a hard time skating with the top six. If you have him on the 3rd line then you have to shelter him because of his defensive liability and his lack of speed.
According to the lines at Camp he's not going to be top 6, the top 6 in practice were.
Knies Matthews Marner
Domi Tavares Nylander.
I suspect the 3rd line is Pacioretty Holmberg Robertson, at least that's what it would be for me because Robertson and Pacioretty have looked great together.
They’ll give it another try next September and it’ll work then.Doesn't look like Berube thinks Nylamder can play centre either.
That experiment never seems to last long for some reason. I was actually hoping it would work this time. At $11M they really needed him to be a centre.
Replacing Tavares with Tavares is a really bad idea.
Doesn't look like Berube thinks Nylamder can play centre either.
That experiment never seems to last long for some reason. I was actually hoping it would work this time. At $11M they really needed him to be a centre.
Replacing Tavares with Tavares is a really bad idea.
I’d hardly call him a defensive liability.
I have to hope that Leafs' management knows a lot more about hockey than I do, because I'm with you here.
Left to my own devices, I would prefer to see younger players come up and develop with the Leafs, and I don't like them cramming their roster with aging vets.
So, what the heck do I know? Maybe it's a good thing that the inmates aren't running the asylum.
Last year Toronto was similar to Florida in team average age.Im just tired of bringing old and slow players that live off their past reputation. Its just like signing Thornton and Marleau....never was a fan of those signing either. I rather like you said have the young guys play and get some experience.
So now I wonder .....where is our shutdown line? the 3rd line with Patch and Robertson?
It sure wont be the 4th line if Reaves is on it.
I've seen enough of Patches this pre-season to say he isn't really top9 material IMO; no point in losing someone on the waivers to sign patches
time to move on with good asset management practice. Unless you can do a sign and trade with patches and get something back then its all good lol