Leafs powerplay simply unacceptable given the amount of money on it

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Blaming the things that are actually responsible. What a crazy idea, eh?

Nobody is blaming Reaves for his PP contributions. People are blaming Treliving for wasting cap and roster spots on useless players like Reaves that are incapable of contributing to a PP, which limits the alternative options we could have to try and fix the 2nd PP unit.
B. Saad was just waived. 4.5m. What do you think of dumping Reaves and another dead weight contract and bringing him over 2m retained.

Frees up a contract spot as well before deadline.
 
B. Saad was just waived. 4.5m. What do you think of dumping Reaves and another dead weight contract and bringing him over 2m retained.
Saad is expensive, struggling, signed for next year, and I don't think he'd help the PP much. He hasn't been very good on the PP through his career, and he has just 2 PP points this year in 46 minutes.
 
Saad is expensive, struggling, signed for next year, and I don't think he'd help the PP much. He hasn't been very good on the PP through his career, and he has just 2 PP points this year in 46 minutes.
Just agreed to mutual termination. I agree, he's not going to help the PP, but if he is willing to sign cheaply, we could try and slot him in LW2, and give him some opportunity to earn a new contract elsewhere next year.
 
This team, right now, is actually playing worse than they ever have in the Matthews era. We decided that we wanted some of those "radical changes", and all it did was make us worse. Surprise, surprise. Thank god for our core and goaltending carrying us and our special teams, or we'd be in real trouble.
This is way under-recognized imo!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dekes For Days
Playing a style that suits you doesn't guarantee you a cup. It's just better than playing a style that doesn't. And while Keefe's system was better and more suited to his team, he quite frankly didn't always stick to it the best in the playoffs. Far too often we let the opponent dictate the style, and we'd try to match their style instead of committing to ours. Instead of pushing the pace, attacking offensively, and trying to control the game like a Colorado, we'd often get too comfortable playing a "safer", slower, lower event, more dump/grind-heavy game, and while we often outperformed the opposition in their style, it still made each goal more consequential and we'd end up losing by one goal on the goalie battle. Now we're tripling down on the parts of our past that worked the least for us.

There are no " inmates running the asylum". Building the best team means striking a balance between the present and future, much like we did. You need to give yourself the best chance you can when you have a great team, without fully depleting internal development. We traded some picks in our best years, but we also got some picks back, drafted well with the picks we had, and supplemented well with undrafted free agents.
By "far too often", you mean the 5 years that Keefe was the coach? So was it Keefe's fault, management's fault, or the players' fault for allowing that to happen for 5 straight years? Do you see something wrong here? I sure do.

Come hell or high water Matthews and Marner play together, and to top it off, when Knies goes down they move McMann up to the 1st line even though he and Nylander had been playing well together. If Matthews and Marner are so good, please tell me why they would need the team's best LWer (since Knies got hurt) to be moved up to play with them? You're telling me that M&M, who combined make around $24 million, need McMann to play with them? Again, do you not see something wrong with that??? But no, the inmates aren't running the asylum! Wake up and smell the coffee, Dekes! Lol
 
By "far too often", you mean the 5 years that Keefe was the coach? So was it Keefe's fault, management's fault, or the players' fault for allowing that to happen for 5 straight years? Do you see something wrong here? I sure do.

Come hell or high water Matthews and Marner play together, and to top it off, when Knies goes down they move McMann up to the 1st line even though he and Nylander had been playing well together. If Matthews and Marner are so good, please tell me why they would need the team's best LWer (since Knies got hurt) to be moved up to play with them? You're telling me that M&M, who combined make around $24 million, need McMann to play with them? Again, do you not see something wrong with that??? But no, the inmates aren't running the asylum! Wake up and smell the coffee, Dekes! Lol
Are you suggesting the players are setting the lines?
 
Are you suggesting the players are setting the lines?
Only Matthews and Marner. Willy doesn’t say much, he just plays with whoever is on his line. It’s sad when you think about it. Two players each making over $10 million, yet neither of them apparently are able to drive their own line. Also, have either of them been benched when they make a boneheaded play (and I don’t mean just one time, how many times have we seen Marner attempt to make a lazy pass on a PP which often gets picked off and sent down the ice, forcing them to bring the puck back up ice and try to regain the offensive zone, killing valuable seconds to do that)?
 
Only Matthews and Marner. Willy doesn’t say much, he just plays with whoever is on his line. It’s sad when you think about it. Two players each making over $10 million, yet neither of them apparently are able to drive their own line. Also, have either of them been benched when they make a boneheaded play (and I don’t mean just one time, how many times have we seen Marner attempt to make a lazy pass on a PP which often gets picked off and sent down the ice, forcing them to bring the puck back up ice and try to regain the offensive zone, killing valuable seconds to do that)?
ok
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad