nuck
Registered User
- Aug 18, 2005
- 11,756
- 2,767
It seems to take about 5 years to evaluate a draft. Lots of players show their colors earlier but by year 5 most of the busts have busted and the late bloomers have shown up. Looking at the 2014 and 2015 drafts we have a pretty good idea of a players value. With 2016 we are still just sorting out guys like Stanley, Kyrou and Puljujarvi. Benson and Brooks will maybe be ready for full time use next season or they may struggle.
I am not certain if Hunter's drafts were his preferences or Lou's in terms of wanting size or older guys that might be pros quicker but I assume Hunters list and Lou's trend, same as Dubas would tell Lilley what the organization wants more of but the head of scouting still makes a general list. Speltz and Lilley both worked under Hunter as well so they helped create his lists and Kyle's.
FWIW I blame/nominate Hunter for the Korshkov pick as no way a GM goes that far out on the 31st pick without the strongest recommendation from his DOS that the guy is some kind of a steal. I am not saying but for Eygor they have a Girard or Debrinbcat, but maybe a Kyrou or Katchouk. Beyond that I think the types of players were heavily flavored by Lou but the general lists are going to look similar to what Kyle might use because the area scouts do most of the populating and a lot of them were carried over. It would be way too early to judge the more recent drafts although 2017 is looking like a wasteland for almost all teams after the top 40 picks.
As far as the recent draft tendency if the little danglers pan out they can be traded for what the club needs but that works better if the emphasis is on guys with best pro potential rather than guys with the highest pure skill. It costs a lot to trade for Muzzins and Folignos if you don't ever try to draft them but that is maybe Kyle's plan, to use the draft wins as currency to buy what they need as he perhaps feels its easier to pick right with the heavy skill bias. He seems to have learned that all dangle doesn't work all that well in the show, but for his draft scheme to really succeed, he has to be prepared to push out his most costly guys once there is a potential lower cost replacement. I don't know if he thinks that way but it is certainly possible that he would move a Mitch or a Willie if Abruzzese and Miettinen were knocking on the door in a couple of years.
I am not certain if Hunter's drafts were his preferences or Lou's in terms of wanting size or older guys that might be pros quicker but I assume Hunters list and Lou's trend, same as Dubas would tell Lilley what the organization wants more of but the head of scouting still makes a general list. Speltz and Lilley both worked under Hunter as well so they helped create his lists and Kyle's.
FWIW I blame/nominate Hunter for the Korshkov pick as no way a GM goes that far out on the 31st pick without the strongest recommendation from his DOS that the guy is some kind of a steal. I am not saying but for Eygor they have a Girard or Debrinbcat, but maybe a Kyrou or Katchouk. Beyond that I think the types of players were heavily flavored by Lou but the general lists are going to look similar to what Kyle might use because the area scouts do most of the populating and a lot of them were carried over. It would be way too early to judge the more recent drafts although 2017 is looking like a wasteland for almost all teams after the top 40 picks.
As far as the recent draft tendency if the little danglers pan out they can be traded for what the club needs but that works better if the emphasis is on guys with best pro potential rather than guys with the highest pure skill. It costs a lot to trade for Muzzins and Folignos if you don't ever try to draft them but that is maybe Kyle's plan, to use the draft wins as currency to buy what they need as he perhaps feels its easier to pick right with the heavy skill bias. He seems to have learned that all dangle doesn't work all that well in the show, but for his draft scheme to really succeed, he has to be prepared to push out his most costly guys once there is a potential lower cost replacement. I don't know if he thinks that way but it is certainly possible that he would move a Mitch or a Willie if Abruzzese and Miettinen were knocking on the door in a couple of years.