ClarkSittler
Registered User
- Mar 25, 2014
- 2,028
- 2,205
No I didn't, I just pointed out the characteristics of cup winning teams which you dodged once again, congratulations!You tried to pretend that only one type of team wins the cup. You cherry picked 4 cup winners. I noted that even within your cherry picked cup winners, Colorado as an example was quite different and did not fit your mentioned characteristics.
I didn't cherry pick Colorado, you did. Dump and Chase, puck possession and rush chances aren't NHL systems, in fact they're not even minor league systems. I'm pretty sure now you don't understand what hockey systems are at all. "They activated their D and played to win" LOL. Yes because no other team does that, I mean who plays to win after all.You asked "What's different about them exactly?". I told you. "Colorado is not a dump and chase team. They value possession and carry the puck at an above average rate. They are good at transition and get rush chances. They were fast, but their forecheck wasn't all that "heavy". They activated their D, and played to win. They're not a particularly physical team, especially in their core players. They are allowed offensive creativity. Etc." Now you're somehow upset that I used the team that you literally brought up to prove you wrong.
But you've never explained this systems at all. What system are we using and what other one should we be using? You've been asked this several times already and never have a coherent response. Why?I don't think there is a "magical system that everyone should be using". I think there are things about our system that our team should change to better play to our strengths, and I have explained what they are and why.
Here we are again with the immature I know you are but what am I form of argument.The only one doing that is you. You're clearly not interested in actual discussion.
Yes he was so unreliable he received multiple offers in the 7 million dollar range. He would've been Colorado's 4th highest paid player, they weren't fitting him under the cap, where do you come up with this nonsense anyway?They could have kept him. His price only increased 2.5m, and they had cap to allocate. They chose others, despite not having a replacement, because he was unreliable. So few wanted him that he didn't sign until mid August, and had to go to the place he previously used a NTC to avoid going.