Started out as a really good take (d depth need vs f depth need) until my ears filled up with too much crap to listen anymore; couldn't even get halfway through. Heavily overestimating Forsberg he hasn't ever been a top 10 forward in the league that's a big stretch. His trade offer (Kerfoot, Engvall, Robertson, 2 1st round picks, & another middling prospect like SDA all the way up to AMIROV?!) for him is terrible for the Leafs, the Leafs aren't acquiring a top 10 forward in him. That package is way more than the Mark Stone deal (rental but extended immediately) who is a top 10-15 forward in the league, Forsberg isn't plain & simple.
Imagine the Leafs getting 1.5 yeafs of Forsberg for: Robertson, Amirov, 1st round pick, 1st round pick, Engvall, Kerfoot. Goodluck in the offseason too or expansion draft.
That may be one of the worst trades in the history of trades. Robertson if born a few days later has been outperforming everyone not named Tim Steutzle or Alexis Lafreniere since his OHL season to his NHL playoffs to AHL season. Maybe the guys in different leagues are debatable but he's definitely outperformed Byfield & Jack Quinn, #8 & #2 in supposedly a strong draft year.
Somewhat agree on Kerfoot take but he's isn't negative value, he'd be a luxury on the 4th line in the playoffs and kills penalties; even if he's a natural winger he's a capable centre. They could get a Johnsson or less return for him; highly doubt he could get a late 2nd but something like a 3rd would be fair especially with his salary remaining per cap hit.