Post-Game Talk: Leafs Eliminated.

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it.
Why do I get the feeling it'll be more of the same?
Because they all are. Some tire pumping, some "we didnt get it dones", etc.

The only thing thatll matter is the GM/President comments. Theres usually some foreshadowing there
 
So you want the referee to be in position to call a possible future infraction and not in the position that they’re actually supposed to be in?
Perhaps physics wasn't your best subject, but re-enact the sequence, he should be able to see it. If these low IQ refs can't figure it out, get rid of them. Incompetence is the easy explanation.
 
Perhaps physics wasn't your best subject, but re-enact the sequence, he should be able to see it. If these low IQ refs can't figure it out, get rid of them. Incompetence is the easy explanation.

According to the rules of physics, can a person see through objects that are solid? Can a person have multiple different lines of sight?

As I said earlier, the referee is placing himself in position to see the puck enter the net. Yes, he is looking for other things, but the net is the priority.
 
According to the rules of physics, can a person see through objects that are solid? Can a person have multiple different lines of sight?

As I said earlier, the referee is placing himself in position to see the puck enter the net. Yes, he is looking for other things, but the net is the priority.
Its essentially a formula, if you've got an analytical mind, you'll understand my comment. If not, binary thought process remains which is what you see in your posts.
 
Perhaps physics wasn't your best subject, but re-enact the sequence, he should be able to see it. If these low IQ refs can't figure it out, get rid of them. Incompetence is the easy explanation.
If he should have been able to see it, maybe he did, figured it out, and made the right call.

Sometimes the simple explanation is the right one.
 
Marner, is the worst playoff performer I have ever seen.

Game 3, Marner had 9 giveaways. That's a Selke candidate?????????????????????????????????

Wow, he scored a game winning goal in game 4, that was a literal hail mary. Then he almost tied up the game with a turnover. Wow he had 6 points in two blowout games.

Please please please please please. Matthews is maybe fixable in Toronto, Marner is not.
Marner best plus player in the playoffs...yeah he must be horrible. 9 turnover my rear end
Lead the team in playoff points despite being the player on the Leafs getting the most attention. Horrible take
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Blaylock38
Already have to stop you right there.
It was Lou who brought in Marleau and Babcock who overplayed him to all f***. And this was all before the big 3 were "coddled" their entire careers by Dubas.
And then Dubas burned a 1st to get rid of the 1 year left on Patty and we literally missed the playoffs because he waived Big Mac for Sparks. LOL
 

Ad

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad