News: Leafs cap - Dubas: We can, and we will keep all our 4 top F

Status
Not open for further replies.

Liminality

Registered User
Oct 22, 2008
13,366
4,014
Such a small number of fans that are actually saying this probably means you are saying it more out of fanaticism.

I'd imagine most are saying the cap issues are with regards to icing an equally talented roster throughout after committing to these forwards.
People are right, the Leafs are not going to be able to get their defense as good as their offense but I think that's not as big of a problem as some fans think. The Leafs are fully committed to their top two lines being their bread and butter and to try and create match up nightmares. I think the plan is to continue with Babcock's style and defenders who can exit the zone and transition to those top forwards.

Maybe it works, maybe it doesn't but I think it's interesting seeing this roster structure. A variant of the Penguins roster, not as good top 2 centers but each of the Leafs centers have a top line winger playing with them.
 

Future

Registered User
Feb 8, 2011
10,736
3,571
Ontario
Theoretically they can, but if they want to build a solid supporting cast then one will have to be traded. But the Leafs are negotiating from a position of strength at the moment and don't need to rush into anything.

Still don't like the Leafs D that much and I think they'll be exploring ways to improve that.

I think that's a good way of saying it. There really is no need to rush anything. It's a young team with a young core and the team is improving. This doesn't have to be a decision made anytime soon. Other young defensemen might step up this year or next year and fill a void. The players on the team may improve. The team defense as a whole might improve. Or the defense could be in shambles. Opportunities will arise. Either way, there's plenty of time to evaluate and no rush to make a bad decision.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScottishCanuck

ijuka

Registered User
May 14, 2016
23,193
16,420
I think they'll have issues because they can't add passable D. I have a feeling that players like Zaitsev, Gardiner and Rielly will get exposed next season.

Furthermore, they've been very fortunate with injuries but if they get into significant injury trouble - Especially when it comes to defense - They will be in big trouble.
 

CantLoseWithMatthews

Registered User
Sep 28, 2015
49,735
59,494
I think they'll have issues because they can't add passable D. I have a feeling that players like Zaitsev, Gardiner and Rielly will get exposed next season.

Furthermore, they've been very fortunate with injuries but if they get into significant injury trouble - Especially when it comes to defense - They will be in big trouble.
how will Rielly get exposed? He already plays pretty much the toughest minutes a player can. And Gardiner has played 500 games. I don't think he's gotten this far by being a fraud or whatever you think
 

Faltorvo

Registered User
Feb 18, 2008
21,067
1,941
I think they'll have issues because they can't add passable D. I have a feeling that players like Zaitsev, Gardiner and Rielly will get exposed next season.

Furthermore, they've been very fortunate with injuries but if they get into significant injury trouble - Especially when it comes to defense - They will be in big trouble.

funny but guess what, same thing said about very other single team in the entire league.
 

mammothCacti

Registered User
Feb 19, 2018
389
237
Oh wow. Yeah sure I'm just saying this because I'm a leaf detractor... I actually happen to like the leafs. When did I say you should trade one of your first overall pick for a defensive dman? Edmonton is a prime example that having a good group of forward with a bad group of defense will get you nowhere near title contention. If you want to trade Nylander, of course something good has to come back your way and not an overreated and unproven defenseman like the Oilers got. If they do their homework, they can build a championship team with Tavares, Matthews and Marner up front with a no 1 defensemen and Rielly in the back.

No offense but the way you phrased it made it seem like you think the Leafs are in Edmonton's position and are destined down the same road.

The bottom line is, for both our arguments there needs to be someone else that's willing to give up that level of defensemen to be worth it or else I'd personally rather just go with full offense than trade away a star for a #4 defenseman.
 

mammothCacti

Registered User
Feb 19, 2018
389
237
I think they'll have issues because they can't add passable D. I have a feeling that players like Zaitsev, Gardiner and Rielly will get exposed next season.

Furthermore, they've been very fortunate with injuries but if they get into significant injury trouble - Especially when it comes to defense - They will be in big trouble.

Rielly already has some of the toughest matchups and QOC in the entire league, there isn't really anyways for him to get exposed anymore.

Also Rielly and Hainsey both got hurt last season, and thats part of the reason why we called up Dermott in the first place.
 

LeafFever

Registered User
Feb 12, 2016
18,890
6,184
I think they'll have issues because they can't add passable D. I have a feeling that players like Zaitsev, Gardiner and Rielly will get exposed next season.

Furthermore, they've been very fortunate with injuries but if they get into significant injury trouble - Especially when it comes to defense - They will be in big trouble.
How much more can they get exposed? Rielly is playing brutal minutes and showing he is a true #1D.
 

EdmFlyersfan

Registered User
Feb 20, 2007
4,958
3,311
Edmonton
Leafs fans want to learn the "hard-way" about not having a good crop of blueliners....good luck with the "run & gun" approach, hahahaha
 

Hfbsux

Registered User
Dec 22, 2012
2,603
1,947
No offense but the way you phrased it made it seem like you think the Leafs are in Edmonton's position and are destined down the same road.

The bottom line is, for both our arguments there needs to be someone else that's willing to give up that level of defensemen to be worth it or else I'd personally rather just go with full offense than trade away a star for a #4 defenseman.

No worries, english is my 2nd language, I'll take the blame. I agree with your opinion, only trade one of them if the return is a legit proven top pairing defenseman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mammothCacti

Placid Perspicuity

Registered User
Apr 19, 2016
358
427
People keep referring to the "Penguins Model" of highly skilled offense coupled with low-cost (perceived as low-skill) defense. I don't think that's what Toronto is using as a template. It's well known that Shannahan is trying to build a puck-possession focused team like his Detroit days. While it's not possible to get the Larionovs, Kozlovs and Konstantinovs to make it happen as well as those teams, I believe that's the style Shanny is envisioning. That's why it was important for him to get Babcock to implement that style. Presumably, that is the vision that Dubas is implementing with his roster. This will result in players that are creative, skilled, and not necessarily known for their bruising ways. This includes the defense, hence the selections of guys like Sandin in the draft when a more defensive D-man is what everyone assumes they need.

Perhaps it is a shortcoming of NHL fans to be caught up in seeing what was successful, and then assuming that if the parts aren't exactly the same, it won't work. (eg. "Crosby/Malkin is way better than Matthews/Tavares," so Leafs can't win.)

There's no fool-proof formula for constructing a winning team. Is every Cup Winner a perfectly constructed team with no faults? Are they all mirror images of past winners? Of course not. It's a question of being able to overcome team weaknesses with strengths; the same for every team. Whether it happens or not is why we watch the games.
 

ijuka

Registered User
May 14, 2016
23,193
16,420
How much more can they get exposed? Rielly is playing brutal minutes and showing he is a true #1D.
I'll wait for a bit more sustained success by him. The mistakes he frequently makes in the defensive zone are pretty bad.
 

LeafFever

Registered User
Feb 12, 2016
18,890
6,184
I'll wait for a bit more sustained success by him. The mistakes he frequently makes in the defensive zone are pretty bad.
He's only 24. He's proven a lot for his age. More than many DMen at the same age that you consider really good right now.
 

LeafFever

Registered User
Feb 12, 2016
18,890
6,184
So Matthews, Tavares, Marner, and Kadri? Nylander is on the block E4! :sarcasm:

Really though is there much separation with Kadri there? He scored 32 goals and was only a couple points total back of Nylander.
Kadri's contract is such a steal. That's a big reason they could get Tavares.
 

pabst blue ribbon

🇺🇦🤝🇵🇱
Oct 26, 2015
3,284
2,065
PG
Isn't there a kind of obvious argument for the Leafs being a better defensive team next season?

Heavily sheltered players like JVR/Bozak leave the team and alleviate the burden that other players have to take on for JVR/Bozak getting easier minutes
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Podium
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad