Leafs and Sabres Almost Swapped Picks at 2012 Draft

BertCorbeau

F*ck cancer - RIP Fugu and Buffaloed
Jan 6, 2012
56,360
38,647
Simcoe County
The fact that we not only got Rielly, but Finn in the second round makes me glad we didn't do the trade ... I really like Finn's game, he could be a gem in the second

Would rather trade MacA for a first in this year's draft .. Tons of talent it seems
 

Pi

Registered User
Nov 16, 2010
48,944
14,033
Toronto
Forget Malcolm Subban. Kid still has a long ways to go. It's not certain he'll be a starter in the league

Malcolm Subban is freaking overrated. Long long way to go before he even becomes NHL capable, let alone starter material.

Not every goalie pick in the first round = Carey Price.
 

King Mapes

Sub to My YouTube Blocks_4_days
Feb 9, 2008
28,862
1,163
Edmonton
I wouldn't do it. Even still, Grigs was ranked high so maybe they take him at 5. Then who do we get? Or Forsberg? Then Caps take Grigs at 11. Then we'd lose big time.

Though at 21, we'd likely take Subban IMO. Who knows though
 

Ruki

Registered User
Jul 21, 2010
210
0
But seriously now...when is Behind The Draft 2012 going to be released? Loved watching the last one.
 

Stats01

Registered User
Jul 12, 2009
20,386
0
Toronto
Is it just me, or wouldn't the 5th overall pick have been enough to get #12 and #21? Throwing in #35 seems like an overpayment from the Leafs.

No I'm right with ya on that one, when I was watching I thought pretty much the same thing, I was like that seems like a bit much for #12 and #21, adding #35 seems like overkill.
 

FireEverybody*

Guest
Interesting. I hadn't thought of it that way.

I'm pretty sure what he meant was that for Grigs to slip to him it would take 5 dmen from a certain point to go ahead of him. Speaking for myself, I know I was counting dmen at the draft before Buffalo picked because it meant one of Grigs, Forsberg, or edit:Faksa would then be guaranteed to fall to us.

This is how I took it.
But pretty sure he said in order for us to get one of our guys.
Obviously if 5 D were picked you guys are very likely to get at least one of Grigorenko or Girgensons
 

phillipmike

Registered User
Oct 27, 2009
12,700
8,617
I would think Burke would have taken Tom Wilson or Cody Ceci at 12 and Gaunce or Finn at 21 had Rielly not been available and the Leafs traded down.

I would have taken Grigorenko at 12 and Subban at 21.
 

jakapono24

Registered User
Oct 20, 2011
170
0
Toronto, ON
I can't believe Grigorenko went so late

It's the whole lazy Russian narrative that got him. If he was Canadian or born in the US like Galchenyuk, he'd have been top 5. I really wish we had traded into the top 10 for a 2nd pick and taken him, although, I do know it's easier said than done.
 

FireEverybody*

Guest
Yes, so thats is them saying that our player was Rielly and we wanted to get him at #5.

I don't think Burke thought the other teams had him ranked at 1.
Burke said he would have taken him at 1.

Do I believe that? IDK.. But Burke is ballsy enough to do it.
 

1995

This is my year!
Dec 19, 2011
851
0
The past
Wonder if Rielly would have been there at 12? If so we probably would have drafted Rielly and Finn with those two picks.
 

FireEverybody*

Guest
Wonder if Rielly would have been there at 12? If so we probably would have drafted Rielly and Finn with those two picks.



No chance everyone in the 6-10 were picking D.
We got lucky he was there at 5.
 

Terrence

Registered User
Aug 3, 2010
9,209
1
Interesting. I hadn't thought of it that way.

I'm pretty sure what he meant was that for Grigs to slip to him it would take 5 dmen from a certain point to go ahead of him. Speaking for myself, I know I was counting dmen at the draft before Buffalo picked because it meant one of Grigs, Forsberg, or edit:Faksa would then be guaranteed to fall to us.

I watched it again, and you're probably right. I just wasn't listening closely enough the first time through.
 

bobg1

Registered User
Sep 21, 2006
968
21
bc
5 and 35 for 12 and 21? No thanks. Very happy Rielly was still on the board when we picked (although, at the time, I was pulling for Forsberg)

I heard today the Leafs and Canucks almost had a deal at the draft until Lou nixed it.
 

Predaleafs

Registered User
Oct 7, 2009
1,069
0
Toronto
i think Burke wanted to move to garuntee he got Finn. They kept saying how he had Finn ranked around 10 if im not mistaken. So, the question is more around is the player we got at 12 gonna make up for the player at 5
 

BayStBullies

Burn the Boats!
Apr 1, 2012
5,478
4,927
That's unbelievable; we're incredibly fortunate that didn't happen. The Leafs end up with an exceptional player at 5; then an incredible steal at 35.

It also adds validity to how much they wanted Rielly; when willing to move down if he is off the board. They would have made the trade; even if one of the top 4 were there instead.
 

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
81,146
58,614
Is it just me, or wouldn't the 5th overall pick have been enough to get #12 and #21? Throwing in #35 seems like an overpayment from the Leafs.

Yeah that's what I was thinking. It took us 3 picks to go from 7 to 5 in 2008... :laugh:
 

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
81,146
58,614
That's unbelievable; we're incredibly fortunate that didn't happen. The Leafs end up with an exceptional player at 5; then an incredible steal at 35.

It also adds validity to how much they wanted Rielly; when willing to move down if he is off the board. They would have made the trade; even if one of the top 4 were there instead.

I'm surprised the 5th wouldn't have gone for the 12th, 21st and a 4th or something and that we had to throw in the 35th too. Dumb Leafs.
 

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
81,146
58,614
The fact that we not only got Rielly, but Finn in the second round makes me glad we didn't do the trade ... I really like Finn's game, he could be a gem in the second

Would rather trade MacA for a first in this year's draft .. Tons of talent it seems

Yeah I'd be all over that too. But we should have dumped him last spring.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad