There's something very strange about that article.
I understand that Sean Day has to accept what's going on as a young adult and at his age and his situation that is a lot to endure. But his brother killed someone. And that article only describes how he's idolized his brother and how he wants his brother see him playing in the NHL. Strange.
They're talking about him, not his brother, though, and Sean Day didn't kill anyone. Sounds like he was close to his brother, that has to be tough, especially as a teenager, even if what his brother did was very, very wrong. Combined with all the stress of not living up to the exceptional player status, you can see it'd be a tough time for the kid, which is all the article is really saying.
Personally I didn't know about any of this, definitely feel for the kid. From a purely analytical point of view, I still wouldn't take him in the top 100 or so picks in the draft, but you still have to sympathize with what he's been through the last few years.
Edit:
Oops, missed this:
No, not saying they are.
Sean and his family are victims as well in a sense and I understand that is what this article is trying to convey. My issue upon first read is that the whole premise just seems somewhat insensitive all things considered. It just felt as if the article was written in a fashion that trivialized someone's death.
Fair enough, I can see your point there, it did focus more on Sean's plight, vs. what was obviously more tragic for the family of the woman killed. But it is a sports magazine, they're going to focus on the pro-prospect.