LiveLongandProspal
NY Rangers = America's Team
What can you offer to take him on? He's slowed down quite considerably, but is still solid in his own zone and is a gritty, tough, heart-and-soul type of player.
player is as described but we waited WAY too long to move; cumulative wear and tear now.What can you offer to take him on? He's slowed down quite considerably, but is still solid in his own zone and is a gritty, tough, heart-and-soul type of player.
Probably a player traded for cap at a deadline or a player they keep for playoffsWhat can you offer to take him on? He's slowed down quite considerably, but is still solid in his own zone and is a gritty, tough, heart-and-soul type of player.
He's a UFA, so he still has rental value. But the point is moot because Rangers will just keep him as a rental or he'll be the cap dump going the other way to make the deal work.These sorts of players are those that you have to pay to get off your cap sheet. Since it's still a large portion of his 4.5 mil cap hit, you'd probably need to pay a 3rd round pick for a team to take him on for you. I'd do that if I were the Sharks but as bern is the resident Rangers trade guy, he ain't having none of that so you guys will be stuck with him.
He can still get the dif on trade down tho that potential max return is lessening by the day.These sorts of players are those that you have to pay to get off your cap sheet. Since it's still a large portion of his 4.5 mil cap hit, you'd probably need to pay a 3rd round pick for a team to take him on for you. I'd do that if I were the Sharks but as bern is the resident Rangers trade guy, he ain't having none of that so you guys will be stuck with him.
there is max value in a vacuum, and then there is take less to get a deal done b'c other considerations [playing Mancini]Assuming the Rangers dont just keep him (as they should for their own playoff aspirations), what would be the ask from Utah?
Just out of pure curiosity... If you were to take out that 4th and replace it with Cuylle, what would you want?He can still get the dif on trade down tho that potential max return is lessening by the day.
If you are serious, in the interest of getting Mancini slotted asap, I would do a 4th and Lindy for a 7th
there is max value in a vacuum, and then there is take less to get a deal done b'c other considerations [playing Mancini]
I'll give you same offer I made above, if you eat all 4.5 expiring cap
Lindy + 4th for a 7th
Adam Pelech
Probably something like a second or third, maybe a late pick too. Rangers have cap room to retain if it helps since he’s an expiring contract.Assuming the Rangers dont just keep him (as they should for their own playoff aspirations), what would be the ask from Utah?
Cuylle is non starter, sorryJust out of pure curiosity... If you were to take out that 4th and replace it with Cuylle, what would you want?
But to your proposal, absolutely yes. We suck back there, and we'd only have a 1 year commitment to decide if we like the player. Outside of the additional cap we take on (big whoop, we ain't competing this year), there is no downside.
It's going to be a pretty big red flag for other competitive teams that a competitive team is looking to dump him for nothing for the most part. And considering the role he fills is one that teams tend to have plenty of options for, I don't think he has any trade value. But I do agree that he could be a cap dump for a deal to work.He's a UFA, so he still has rental value. But the point is moot because Rangers will just keep him as a rental or he'll be the cap dump going the other way to make the deal work.
Realistically, we don't know that NYR actually want to move him. Fans want to move him. But yes, the only way you trade Lindgren to a contender would be if one the following happened.It's going to be a pretty big red flag for other competitive teams that a competitive team is looking to dump him for nothing for the most part. And considering the role he fills is one that teams tend to have plenty of options for, I don't think he has any trade value. But I do agree that he could be a cap dump for a deal to work.
A player better than Cuylle. Rangers won't be adding Cuylle to a make a Lindgren trade look more sexy.Just out of pure curiosity... If you were to take out that 4th and replace it with Cuylle, what would you want?
He’s injured too often to know for sure. Maybe I have an inflated view of Lindgren, he always plays us extremely toughHas Pelech really fallen that far?
No, you don’t. Insane take. 1 year at 4.5 for a productive player?These sorts of players are those that you have to pay to get off your cap sheet. Since it's still a large portion of his 4.5 mil cap hit, you'd probably need to pay a 3rd round pick for a team to take him on for you. I'd do that if I were the Sharks but as bern is the resident Rangers trade guy, he ain't having none of that so you guys will be stuck with him.
We aren’t looking to dump him. A few over reactive fans who can’t control their emotions sully his reputation on this website.It's going to be a pretty big red flag for other competitive teams that a competitive team is looking to dump him for nothing for the most part. And considering the role he fills is one that teams tend to have plenty of options for, I don't think he has any trade value. But I do agree that he could be a cap dump for a deal to work.