Why do they want him playing in Russia "even less" than him not playing at all?
Moving to Canadian juniors was terrible for Zadorov's development. Do they want to finish off his hockey career for good now?
Canadian juniors are terrible for Russian players in general. That has been proven time and time again.Yes, if only Canada could develop as many world-class defencemen as Russia does.
Great!London released their other import. Just Bergman.
I see something similar to Glodbin happening with Zadorov. Zadorov mind isn't in junior hockey. It wasn't here last year either. He wants to play with men.
Why do they want him playing in Russia "even less" than him not playing at all?
Moving to Canadian juniors was terrible for Zadorov's development. Do they want to finish off his hockey career for good now?
Great!
Another year playing against 16 year old kids when he could be playing with/against Radulov and Kovalchuk in Russia.
But this must be the fastest way to the NHL!11!!
Screws his draft stock up. Yakimov was a surefire 2nd rounder maybe even late 1st but fell to third round due to KHL factor. Same thing happened to tarasenko and kuznetov. Zadorov probably goes 20th or around there if so.
Nope, Zadorov would not have went in the first round had he stayed in Russia, probably not secound round either.
Yeah, no. Buffalo isn't sending the kid to the KHL. If they didn't think that idea was utterly terrible, they would've done it already. Nobody wants him to lose precious development time sitting on the bench in Buffalo, but they obviously want him playing in Ruissia even less.
There are two major problems:Nah, those kids choose their ways, and they must pay if something goes wrong. They aren't some headless chickens afterall..
Zadorov looks like an exception so far, although it's too early of course to try to reach for a conclusion either way. But his progress in London has been great, I'd say. To the point where an NHL team is already contemplating keeping him instead of sending him back to junior, despite him being a junior-aged player. I can't see what more he could have accomplished if he had been developing somewhere else.You disagree?
No, he looks like a rule. Dozens of Russia's best prospects have been ruined in Canadian juniors. They go to play there, regress and in a few years quit their careers.Zadorov looks like an exception so far, although it's too early of course to try to reach for a conclusion either way. But his progress in London has been great, I'd say. To the point where an NHL team is already contemplating keeping him instead of sending him back to junior, despite him being a junior-aged player. I can't see what more he could have accomplished if he had been developing somewhere else.
You may think that is the rule, and it is certainly an arguable trend (which, incidentally is off-topic in this thread and any general discussion of it which doesn't center on Zadorov will be deleted)...No, he looks like a rule. Dozens of Russia's best prospects have been ruined in Canadian juniors. They go to play there, regress and in a few years quit their careers.
... but the Zadorov case sure doesn't seem to fit. Zadorov is 19 and on an NHL roster... he went from a gangly-potential-laden 17 year old to a 1st round pick to an NHL preview and OHL star at 18... he's really a case of a player developing really well, I don't see how you can argue that his "development was ruined"... at the very least, that's an extremely premature statement. Even if you think there is a general rule, you have to accept the exceptions when they come along, because there are always exceptions, and it just makes you look a little too fanatical about it if you try to paint a clear exception (or at least, strong exception candidate) as fitting your "rule".Zadorov had the physical tools to be a great defenseman, but his development was ruined by playing against kids instead of men.
You disagree?
London was great for his development. He said it himself that he was limited in Russia, but since moving to NA he's gotten more freedom offensively and he's been better coached. I'm not making this stuff up, he said it himself.
He's just not ready for the NHL and he has nothing left to do in juniors.
how limited? He played MHL (major juniors) when his peers (born 1995) played among kids. Junior coach saw a talent in him and got him a chance among juniors as soon as possible. If he stayed, he would play among men since 18.
I dont know if he said it... if yes, then it was because NA fans/agent wanted him to say it. He was forced.
He was limited in terms of playing. He said that coaches in Russia wanted to focus on defence and defence only, but when he got to NA, the hunters wanted him to jump in and join the offence. This added versatility to his game.
And I'm not even going to address the 2nd point because that may be one of the most ridiculous thing I've ever read on this site. And that's saying a lot.
Wonderful counter argument.
Would rather him just play in the NHL for 40+ games this season and practice with the team full time rather than him play another year in juniors. I feel like that would be better for his development.
It's not like we're doing crap this year...might as well let him play on the 3rd pairing and move Risto up to the 2nd pairing.
It's not better development for a player to have practices and not be playing. Ray Ferraro discussed this fact last week on the radio.
Just send him back to London and get it over with
@BillHoppeNHL
In regards to @kevinoDandC's tweets, Zadorov's agent just told me said the #Sabres can technically send Nikita Zadorov to London ... (1/2)
but the Knights would still have to request Zadorov's release from the KHL for him to play there. (2/2)