CaviarAndRinkFries
Registered User
- Jan 1, 2025
- 18
- 51
The commentators that work for the team say hes good defensively so im going to flame anyone online who says differently.You are just spewing what people intially thought and throwing shit and hoping it sticks. Even commentators were talking the other day that he is good on D. Always first one back. For a 20 year old, elite offensive player, his Defense has been pretty dman good.
You don't watch Habs games so how would you even know? And if you did, you clearly don't know much about hockey then.
You used 1 made up advanced statistic (xGA) that is meant to be a team stat in a vacuum to tell us he's bad defensively. At least the commentators have watched the games, all you do is post a number that you don't even understand.The commentators that work for the team say hes good defensively so im going to flame anyone online who says differently.
which commentators work for the team lolThe commentators that work for the team say hes good defensively so im going to flame anyone online who says differently.
There's really no comparable to him in the league right now in terms of style of play.... He's incredibly cheeky , borderline disrespectful with how he attacks and baits guys with the puck on his stick. , its hilarious how nobody even pressures him anymore. Rookie 20 year old 5"7 dman going through guys like it's a beer league game, Its a little bit uncanny.
XGA and HDCA are two stats. They are very easy to understand.You used 1 made up advanced statistic (xGA) that is meant to be a team stat in a vacuum to tell us he's bad defensively. At least the commentators have watched the games, all you do is post a number that you don't even understand.
I have a link that might help you realise some things and understanding the game better but unfortunately I can't post it here.XGA and HDCA are two stats. They are very easy to understand.
Evolving-Hockey
evolving-hockey.com
This might help you
idk about you but hes looked so damn good defensively over the past 25 or so games other than one or two games here and there. If anything its Matheson, his D partner, who has struggled a lot more on his offside.-Yes, Hutson has struggled a little defensively this year.
-He's 20. Virtually no defensemen are high level players in their own end at that age, because so much of being good defensively is experience and being comfortable in systems. He'll continue to get better there.
-The good of the offense that he brings already significantly outweighs the bad. He's a net positive defenseman at 20 years old playing top pair minutes. That's incredibly promising.
idk about you but hes looked so damn good defensively over the past 25 or so games other than one or two games here and there. If anything its Matheson, his D partner, who has struggled a lot more on his offside.
Why don't these two stats match the eye test? Not shitting on you but the way you and others are using this stat to justify Hutson as horrible defensively just does not match my eyeballsXGA and HDCA are two stats. They are very easy to understand.
Evolving-Hockey
evolving-hockey.com
This might help you
They don’tWhy don't these two stats match the eye test? Not shitting on you but the way you and others are using this stat to justify Hutson as horrible defensively just does not match my eyeballs
I know other Habs fans agree with me but curious what other fans see when they watch him play? On a regular basis I mean not just on a bad night like vs the leafs or a really good night vs the Canucks.
Alot of People advocating for these advanced stats are not talking at all about his game. Just throwing numbers around as if that automatically means he is a liability out there. And I just dont see it.
Is he amazing defensively? No....but he definitely doesn't look bad to me. He's got a different style, he defends very aggressively. Way better than I thought he would be at things like using his stick, reading the play and fighting for positioning.
Id say he's DECENT defensively at this point. Which is far better than what I was expecting so I'll take it.....but saying he's horrible? And using a few advanced stats as the only argument? Nahhhh I don't buy it sorry.