Sweetpotato
Registered User
Wow I'll be honest I didnt know that. Thanks. That sucks a bit.Starting this season, you cannot win 1st overall in back to back years.
Wow I'll be honest I didnt know that. Thanks. That sucks a bit.Starting this season, you cannot win 1st overall in back to back years.
Kakko going to be in the playoffs his third season. Going to better teams isn’t always good for playing time and situations. Kakko would’ve been PP1 his first season on a terrible team. He may never be PP1 with the Rangers.There’s a big difference in what team is picking 1st overall
Are you looking at a team like Arizona or a team like Montreal.
These kids can manage being on a bad team for a couple of years if the management is top tier
Looking "green" in this tournament? How exactly? He's been Finland's most reliable defenseman with the puck. And in terms of scoring chance generation, very high along with Kulonummi. If he's looked green, then every other Finnish defenseman has looked significantly more green, with a possible exception of Kulonummi.Great in SM-Sarja play but looking green in this tournament. Still, only 16 years old and he's looked more like a future No. 1 than Kulonummi or Laakso, and Salin doesn't look the same since his concussion earlier in the season. Clearly a smart player in a Heinola kind of way but needs to take a hit every now and then to complete a play. Wanted to see more rushes and entries like he does for TPS but that could be coming from the bench, as none of the Finnish dmen are consistently carrying the puck past center.
Kakko going to be in the playoffs his third season. Going to better teams isn’t always good for playing time and situations. Kakko would’ve been PP1 his first season on a terrible team. He may never be PP1 with the Rangers.
Lundell also is going to the playoffs on a great team his first season, but doesn’t play the PP. There are trade-offs of being on a better team.
The entire Finnish defense corps compared to previous years is below average. He’s still unsure of himself against a physical forecheck and treated the puck like a hot potato that led to turnovers. Offensive zone was fine and you see his smarts, but he looked more poised, decisive, and confident (and physical) in league play.Looking "green" in this tournament? How exactly? He's been Finland's most reliable defenseman with the puck. And in terms of scoring chance generation, very high along with Kulonummi. If he's looked green, then every other Finnish defenseman has looked significantly more green, with a possible exception of Kulonummi.
Huh? He's exceptionally calm under forecheck pressure, by far the best Finnish defenseman at dealing with forecheck and in every single game has solved some troublesome situations with very quick wit. You're saying he treated the puck like a hot potato and I'd say that that's the complete opposite of what I've been seeing.The entire Finnish defense corps compared to previous years is below average. He’s still unsure of himself against a physical forecheck and treated the puck like a hot potato that led to turnovers. Offensive zone was fine and you see his smarts, but he looked more poised, decisive, and confident (and physical) in league play.
Kulonummi did not have a good tournament, but it’s just a few games.
Holy I must have been looking at the wrong jersey numbersThe entire Finnish defense corps compared to previous years is below average. He’s still unsure of himself against a physical forecheck and treated the puck like a hot potato that led to turnovers. Offensive zone was fine and you see his smarts, but he looked more poised, decisive, and confident (and physical) in league play.
Kulonummi did not have a good tournament, but it’s just a few games.
Huh? He's exceptionally calm under forecheck pressure, by far the best Finnish defenseman at dealing with forecheck and in every single game has solved some troublesome situations with very quick wit. You're saying he treated the puck like a hot potato and I'd say that that's the complete opposite of what I've been seeing.
Most sources say that Kulonummi has had a good tournament. I'm of the opinion that Kiviharju makes him look better than he is, though. In any case, Kulonummi's been Finland's best non-Kiviharju defenseman by far. Lassi Alanen said that Kulonummi should have been named a top 3 player for Finland over Kemell.
But yes, this level of play is quite a bit stronger than U20SM league play, so it's natural he'd struggle more, especially against the better teams. Additionally, it's a quick tournament, and Finland's coaching is mediocre at best. He played more confident and carried the puck more in CSM two seasons ago. However, in U20 SM-Sarja his play style to my eyes was very similar to how he plays at U18 WJC, and I even saw him play there live which I wonder if you did? In there the breakouts generally were a quick pass to a forward as here. He's not carrying the puck up the ice very often, but is sometimes - and that's a coaching system decision anyway.
Some really weird things you're saying, I wonder how many agree with any of it.
You just said he struggled more in this tournament than in the SM-Sarja, which is ummmmm, what I said?
Vaakanainen ahead of Makar -- played against men, bigger, stronger, fantastic skater and an excellent shot. Makar played against a lot of CHL castoffs and wannabes. Nuff said.
Liljegren ahead of Heiskanen -- Better skater, better shooter, more explosive and exciting. Risky, but has Karlsson type upside. Heiskanen is a safer pick, better in his own end, smarter. Won't pay to see him play. Only reason why people are creaming over him is the recent U18s -- a tournament Vaakanainen was excellent in. Heiskanen dropped from 9-12. Only reason why he dropped was because I dug deeper into Glass and Vilardi and they impressed me enough to get a bump. Brannstrom also leapfrogged him because I think he is more exciting, creating and intense.
Friendly reminder that Steve is guessing too, just like the rest of us. "Nuff said!"
Is this some sort of joke? Treated the puck like a hot potato? He's been complete opposite of that with great opening passes under pressure shift after shift. Are you sure you have watched the right player?The entire Finnish defense corps compared to previous years is below average. He’s still unsure of himself against a physical forecheck and treated the puck like a hot potato that led to turnovers. Offensive zone was fine and you see his smarts, but he looked more poised, decisive, and confident (and physical) in league play.
Kulonummi did not have a good tournament, but it’s just a few games.
But you're talking as if that's a criticism. It's completely normal to have bigger problems at a more difficult level than at an easier level - logical, even. Every Finnish defenseman has more issues here than in club play - Heck, some players like Salin or Laakso even played significant amounts of Liiga and nevertheless have struggled here.You just said he struggled more in this tournament than in the SM-Sarja, which is ummmmm, what I said?
Kivi has had a very few moments where he got overwhelmed by the forecheck, sure, but that's ineviteable on a bad defensive team, overall he's been the most impressive player on a team and the kid JUST turned 16 for christ sake, did you close your eyes all the time's where he made great defensive play's?The entire Finnish defense corps compared to previous years is below average. He’s still unsure of himself against a physical forecheck and treated the puck like a hot potato that led to turnovers. Offensive zone was fine and you see his smarts, but he looked more poised, decisive, and confident (and physical) in league play.
Kulonummi did not have a good tournament, but it’s just a few games.
Disagree. Just re-watched the Sweden game. The first 30 minutes were sloppy for that pairing, with turnovers, unforced icings, cutting in front of net under pressure, etc. A little less in the Czech game but Kulonummi made a couple of lazy plays that led to chances (Kulich had one early in the 3rd).But you're talking as if that's a criticism. It's completely normal to have bigger problems at a more difficult level than at an easier level - logical, even. Every Finnish defenseman has more issues here than in club play - Heck, some players like Salin or Laakso even played significant amounts of Liiga and nevertheless have struggled here.
The main issue I have with what you said is that he's treated the puck like a hot potato and similar, which definitely is completely false. He's actually played very calm and mature, so your assessment is completely incorrect. He's still by far Finland's most steady and reliable defenseman with the puck as a double underager.
Either the issue is that you're not watching, or that you don't understand what you're watching.
Disagree. Just re-watched the Sweden game. The first 30 minutes were sloppy for that pairing, with turnovers, unforced icings, cutting in front of net under pressure, etc. A little less in the Czech game but Kulonummi made a couple of lazy plays that led to chances (Kulich had one early in the 3rd).
Gronman-Minkkinen has been the most consistent Finnish defense pairing.