Of course it becomes painfully obvious in the next two movies that certain people are deathly afraid of any new ideas or challenges to old ideas and the only counter move they could come up with was to again just run back some rehashed, generic BS. And they couldn't even execute that well! It might be one of the deadest horses to beat on this website, but my god does TROS suck so bad. I can't even imagine myself going back to give that movie another chance.
I get irritated at the suggestion that negative reviews for the 2nd film are solely the result of an inability to accommodate change, or challenge your beliefs, or some kind of deep seated resentment against non-traditional and minority characters.
It's just a bad movie. That's all. It's not very good.
I like Rey, I like Rose, I like Finn, I don't have any problems with the characters they invented.
I have an issue with the bizarre fuel chase and Leia flying through space, and Poe's absurd mutiny because of a secret plan that had no reason to be secret, and a pointless Casino planet and a villain (Snoke) that we know nothing about before he is offed without any real fanfare or understanding.
There are a few solid moments (like Luke's send-off) but ultimately I found that they were relatively few and far between. I liked Kylo and Rey's interactions throughout the film.
You get the sense that Rian just wants to wipe the slate clean of anything that came before him, and put his own stamp on the franchise, which is fine if you're not doing the second movie of a trilogy.
And Rise of Skywalker wasn't very good either. Personally, I blame TLJ for painting Rise of Skywalker into a corner that the franchise was clearly not happy with, but the corrective surgery just caused the whole house of cards to fall apart.
Everything about RoS just came out of nowhere.
Finn is a side character all of a sudden, a giant fleet of planet killing spaceships is assembled on a single planet (with crews presumably) without anyone knowing about it. Palpatine was behind it all along despite not one hint or clue as to that fact in the previous two films. They erase C-3POs personality without even blinking even as they mourn Chewbacca. Somehow they wrangle the entire galaxy's stock of ships in a few hours and bring them to bear.
Rian killed the big villain and supplanted him with Kylo, but without another villain, there's no redemption arc for the pretty Sith. So time to bring back the guy that Darth Vader heroically defeated. Wait, he didn't!?! He's still alive (surviving being dropped down a well and exploding) so I guess Anakin's redemption arc fell a bit short.
I did like the scene showing Leia and Luke training together which answered the question as to why Leia didn't have a lightsaber. I also liked the references to past Jedi - they did a decent job with the voice-overs for that part.
Lost in all of the identity politics and the finger pointing and the neckbeards and snowflakes and accusing everyone of hate are a trilogy of generally uninspiring movies.
The Mandalorian is like a huge splinter in the finger that is the Star Wars sequel trilogy in that it shows how effortlessly you can make a Star Wars story look that is appealing while not trying to one-up whatever came before it.
KallioWeHardlyKnewYe said:
I'm a defender of The Last Jedi and agree wholeheartedly with your assertion that Rian Johnson is the best director to ever do a Star Wars movie. It's really not much of a competition, but he runs away with it.
It's pretty clearly Irvin Kirshner IMO, as far as SW films are concerned.
As far as Rian’s entire catalogue, you have a point.