Movies: Last Movie You Watched and Rate it | {Insert Appropriate Seasonal Greeting Here}

  • Xenforo Cloud has scheduled an upgrade to XenForo version 2.2.16. This will take place on or shortly after the following date and time: Jul 05, 2024 at 05:00 PM (PT) There shouldn't be any downtime, as it's just a maintenance release. More info here

The Macho King

Back* to Back** World Champion
Jun 22, 2011
48,878
29,499
The Maltese Falcon

I haven't seen this in awhile - maybe 10 years or so. I remember really loving it. On this watch I came away underwhelmed. The pacing and transitions are... odd, but I'll chalk that up to the standards of the time and not be too critical of it. I think Bogart may be my biggest issue, despite me loving him in so many other films. There's something about him knowing everything that is just grating. I compare this to something like The Thin Man, which while not noir plays the mystery angle and the detective aspect much better and I think is a much more satisfying movie, or the Big Sleep and Double Indemnity, which are just better examples of noir. I just found myself bored and unsatisfied. 5/10

This did get me searching for modern movies to dig into. I wanted to re watch L.A. Confidential but it's not on streaming, which then somehow got me to watching my favorite Crowe movie which is in no way a mystery...

Master and Commander: Far Side of the World

God this is my favorite movie. Performances are mostly perfect (I would have gone another direction for Maturin than Paul Bettany but that's fine). Its a mash up of about 5 O'Brien books with the French as the baddies instead of the Americans. Just amazing historical detail and a plot that - while a little messy - is so enjoyable. The final battle is one of the best ever battle scenes put to film. 10/10
 

Puck

Ninja
Jun 10, 2003
10,772
421
Ottawa
A hyper-specific bit of praise for Top Gun: Maverick. I don't know that a woman has ever looked better than Jennifer Connolly leaning on that car (an Aston Martin?) toward the end of this movie.
A runner-up in that car-leaning department ;)

1656525670063.png
 

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,600
3,483
Follow up thoughts to Top Gun Maverick -- Part of me feels like I'm just getting softer in some respects. This movie is the latest I've seen along with RRR and Ambulance where my overwhelming takeaway was, "Man, I had a really good time!" I can pull things out of all three movies that didn't work, but it feels like needless nitpicking considering when the credits began to roll in all three I was smiling ear-to-ear. Then again maybe this is just a good moment for well made sugary desserts such as these?

Maverick is completely predictable but in that way that plays more like "Are the going to do that? Hell yeah they are!" rather than "Oh no, they're not going to do that are they?" I heard someone draw the parallel to The Force Awakens, which felt like a pretty good comparison. Both are sequels heavily indebted to scenes, dialogues and structure of earlier movies but handled deftly enough to feel additive and not merely repetitive. There are countless echos of the earlier movie, but several have been given a meaningful tweak. You bet your ass there's an exuberant bar singalong — but seen through Mav's eyes, it's a somber moment, not a joyous one. Rooster isn't a Maverick clone, but rather a cautious over thinker. The driving force of the movie undeniably is money — lots and lots of money. BUT bless them for getting a script that makes the situation and motivations plausible (at least in this silly world).

Cruise himself is very good. Though he still has an air of invincible agelessness, he's more craggy and damaged in this than he often allows himself to be. It's not a stretch. He of course is the coolest of cool cats in the face of danger and is never fazed by mission pressures, but he lets the personal conflicts seep through in his performance. Vulnerability he hasn't shown in some time on screen.

Supporting cast is a bunch of pros who are mostly one-note characters but the actors fully commit to those notes and play them to the hilt. I particularly liked Glen Powell as "arrogant (but ultimately helpful) jerk," Jon Hamm as "angry (but ultimately understanding) boss" and Jennifer Connelly as "weary (but ultimately game) love interest." For further thoughts on Connelly, see above post.

This is some really exemplary, satisfying blockbuster film making.
 

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,600
3,483
Crimes of the Future. You know how your favorite singer or band — now decades into their career — will sometimes drop an album (still a thing, right?) that makes you remember all the reasons you loved them in the first place? Not as good as their classic stuff, but a pleasing throwback that shows despite a long time off and forays into different genres or styles that they still do indeed have something that resembles "it." That's this. The concepts and visuals play like a David Cronenberg greatest hits with strong parallels to The Brood, Videodrome, Scanners and Dead Ringers in particular. It's not as focused as any of those nor is it as good, but you also wouldn't take a bathroom break if he busted this one out in concert.
 

The Macho King

Back* to Back** World Champion
Jun 22, 2011
48,878
29,499
So I had what I thought was a pretty big blind spot having not seen Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon.

Decided to rectify it.

The action was fantastic. It balanced the wire aspects with great physicality in a way that - while obviously fake looking - still incredibly impressive. All of the three primaries had their moment to shine, but Chow Yung Fats character was probably the most boring.

The plot was fine. There to service the action mostly and it does that. I wish Fox was a bigger "threat" but her being as she was fit the plot fine.

My biggest knock - the flashback in the middle of the movie was too long. Felt like it was about 20 minutes when it could have been 5.

Still - 7/10 would definitely recommend.
 

Osprey

Registered User
Feb 18, 2005
27,542
10,185
Watcher (2022) - 4/10

An American woman (Maika Monroe) moves with her husband to Bucharest and believes that a stranger is staring at her from the apartment across the street. It's like Rosemary's Baby combined with Rear Window, but with a lot less suspense and plot. It's about paranoia and isolation and drives the latter home by having half of the dialogue in Romanian without subtitles so that we feel as isolated and stare as blankly as the main character, waiting for translation. It's a very slow burn, which I don't necessarily mind, but it has to slowly ramp up and pay off and this does neither. It's also entirely predictable and the lead character does some of the dumbest things, like stalking the person that she thinks is stalking her... while she knows that there's a serial killer loose in the neighborhood. Granted, it wouldn't be much of a movie if she stayed in her apartment all day and just ignored the creep, but still. At least the acting is good from Monroe, who's like a budget Amber Heard without the craziness.

Razorback (1984) - 5/10

A huge wild boar rampages around the Australian Outback, carrying off women and children. Crikey. It's described as "Jaws on land" and one of Australia's better horror films. A New York reporter travels to the Outback to do a story on kangaroo hunters and meets a legendary razorback hunter, which is suspiciously similar to the premise of 1986's Crocodile Dundee. There's no humor, though, unless you count an Aussie saying, "Canadians are Americans, aren't they?" I suppose that that's like us confusing New Zealanders for Australians. At one point, our American Canadian hero climbs a rickety windmill and spends the night, which might've inspired a scene in Tremors, which was neat. There isn't a whole lot of swine action, though. Probably because it's easier than filling a whole movie with attacks from a hardly seen monster, half of the plot revolves around two crazy brothers who look and sound like villains from a Mad Max movie. At least we see the pig equivalent of Bruce, tusks and all, in the end. It was still a little disappointing that there wasn't more of him, though. On the bright side, the film is well paced and has pretty good cinematography for a horror film, so I can't say that it was a boar.

The Lost World (1960) - 5/10

An expedition visits a secluded plateau to investigate the existence of dinosaurs iguanas with horns glued to them. Irwin Allen's remake of the 1925 silent classic is one gorgeous CinemaScope film. The jungle sets really come alive in color. I'm a bit of a sucker for these color widescreen films about expeditions to strange lands that were popular in the 60s. I was enjoying it right up until the "dinosaurs" that were promised turned out to be iguanas, monitor lizards and baby crocodiles. Talk about a letdown. Apparently, Allen wanted to use stop motion to create dinosaurs like the 1925 version, but the studio wouldn't give him the budget, so a trip to the reptile and hardware stores was all that he could afford. It would've at least helped if the characters simply referred to them as monsters or beasts, but they repeatedly call them "dinosaurs," which was laughable and kind of ruined the film for me. It's too bad because this could've been a classic and a worthy remake if it had had a bit more of a budget.

Let's see... since I'm on a roll, what else have I watched in the last month that I've been too lazy to review?

Ambulance (2022) - 6/10

Two bank robbers (Jake Gyllenhaal and someone whose name is even harder to spell) make their getaway in an ambulance... with a bleeding cop who should've died several times already and a first responder who's as good at keeping him alive as she is attractive in the back. This ridiculous plot is actually somewhat believable compared to some of Michael Bay's other movies. It reminded me of 1990s blockbuster action films in a good way. There's a heist, a shootout, a very long car chase that feels like something out of a Grand Theft Auto game, shots where the camera is just quickly circling characters as if the cameraman is drunk, helicopters, explosions and more. It's so Michael Bay.

Black Snake Moan (2006) - 5/10

A rural Southern man (Samuel L. Jackson) finds a half-naked, white trash girl (Christina Ricci) on the side of the road and chains her up in his house in order to "help" her... because chaining a stranger to a radiator shows that you care. It's sort of like My Fair Lady if Henry Higgins were a poor, black Southerner and Eliza Doolittle were a slut with a sex addiction. It doesn't make sense and I get the feeling that the plot was just an excuse to see Ricci in her underwear (and occasionally less) for half of the movie... not that I minded, of course.

X (2022) - 5/10

In the 70s, a bunch of young people rent a guest building on a Texas ranch from a very old couple in order to shoot a porno, obviously without their permission. The era and the premise are the most interesting things about it. Other than that, it's a rather standard slasher that was obviously inspired by The Texas Chain-Saw Massacre. Director Ti West captures that 70s horror feeling like he did the 80s horror feeling in The House of the Devil, which I liked. It's never boring, either, but it's a bit predictable, unbelievable and not scary. It's more of a fun slasher where you enjoy watching the young folk die. I guess that, considering that it's A24 and has really good reviews (95% at RT), I was just expecting something a little more original.

Memory (2022) - 5/10

A hitman (Liam Neeson) refuses to kill a teen girl and suddenly becomes a target of both his employer and a cop (Guy Pierce), but is hampered by progressively worsening memory loss. It's a bit hard to buy a plot that involves a deadly hitman who forgets where he put his car keys. Still, it could've been worse had it not been for very capable direction by Martin Campbell, who did Casino Royale, among other big films. That elevates it ahead of several of Neeson's other recent action films, but not quite to the point that I enjoyed it or would recommend it except to the biggest Neeson fans.

Apparently, June was a month of mostly 5/10s for me. Maybe I subconsciously gravitated towards films that I suspected that I wouldn't like (or dislike) enough to review afterwards.
 
Last edited:

OzzyFan

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
3,653
960
Laura (1944)
3.25 out of 4stars

“As a Manhattan detective investigates the murder of an advertising executive in her fashionable apartment, he is brought into a world of obsession, deceit, and love triangles.”
A great psychological mystery drama noir about obsession that’s filled with twists and cynical characters at every turn. Stylish, smooth, witty, a bit sophisticated, and full of good performances, especially by Clifton Webb. The web of obsession and jealousy fuels just about every action in this film. It’s quite funny how everyone selfishly tried to determine Laura’s fate and future for her without any regard for her own feelings on the subject, using her for whatever purpose they need. Along with the flood of lies, the manipulation and arguably tainted point of views makes you wonder about the accuracy of some aforementioned details and descriptions throughout also. And, the movie does an excellent job at showing many different possible forms/reasons for “spousal relationships”, such as beauty, companionship, sexual relations, age, status, stability, connections, intelligence, charm, money, love, exhilaration, and possibly even a beard.

Elevator to the Gallows (1958) (subtitles)
3.25 out of 4stars

“A self-assured businessman with “the perfect plan” murders his employer, the husband of his mistress, which unintentionally provokes an ill-fated chain of events.”
A great fateful noir that is defined by coincidences and appearances, or “not everything is what it seems to be”. The fragility of best laid plans never ceases to amaze me, and this film takes that to a darkly ironic, and arguably “gallows-humorous”, way. Oddly, we see the complete opposite side of the spectrum also in how impulsivity causes its own obvious problems also. Everything is in the details and essentially fallibility exists in all machinery and human DNA. It’s also arguably full of cynicism, yet at the same time full of completely different views of romance and romantic gestures. The movie is spellbinding with its style, smoothness, and effortless progression to go with great camerawork. And the Miles Davis score is nothing short of sublime perfection in every scene it exists.

Young Frankenstein (1974)
3.15 out of 4stars

“An American grandson of the infamous Frankenstein scientist, struggling to prove that his grandfather was not as insane as people believed, is invited to Transylvania, where he discovers the process that reanimates a dead body.”
A great comedy horror spoof that is continuously funny and carried by a committed Gene Wilder turn. Features a good mix of high and low brow humor, including lots of wordplay, that uses its source material delightfully. The whole cast seems to be having fun too.

The Bad Seed (1956)
3.10 out of 4stars

“Rhoda seems like your average smart and sweet 8 year old girl on the surface, but underneath has characteristics of selfishness and greed. When her rival at school dies in mysterious circumstances at the school picnic, her mother starts to suspect Rhoda may be responsible.”
A great psychological horror drama about the origin of a psychopath and outward appearances being deceiving of one’s true character (the old don’t judge a book by its cover saying). It’s a horrifying fact that there are psychotic and innately violent people among us in the world that look and act harmless, kind, and charismatic in public. One wouldn’t think that some of their nicest acquaintances and coworkers could be like that, but some actually are and their potential and actions of savagery behind closed doors does occur. The interesting debate of nature vs nurture in “how a psychopath comes to exist '' is brought up a little here, and I’d say it hints at a combination as the cause. While it’s clear that certain genetic traits can lead one to being more prone to psychopathic behavior, child rearing and surrounding circumstances/environment definitely play a major role in that being expressed/evolving or condemned/mitigated. The film is altogether a pretty good examination of psychopaths, their evolution/prevention, and their effects on those around them, brought to life through an 8 year old rich intelligent blonde-haired blue eyed little girl.
 

The Macho King

Back* to Back** World Champion
Jun 22, 2011
48,878
29,499
You've all been waiting. Well here it is.

Minions: Rise of Gru

Took my daughter to see this one as her first theater experience. I've seen the previous ones and they are what they are. This one found a way to be less. A 10 minute adventure cold open centering on characters you don't know and aren't particularly interesting was a very poor choice. The minion antics are what they are so go in knowing that, but there is surprisingly little of it. None of these movies are great but this one achieves something the others couldn't - it was boring. I didn't see the very end as my daughter wanted to go out and play in the little arcade, but this one was a let down of my already low expectations. A few chuckles - mainly the king fu training - but otherwise boring and missing what charm the previous entries of the franchise had.

2/10
 

Rabid Ranger

2 is better than one
Feb 27, 2002
31,302
11,383
Murica
You've all been waiting. Well here it is.

Minions: Rise of Gru

Took my daughter to see this one as her first theater experience. I've seen the previous ones and they are what they are. This one found a way to be less. A 10 minute adventure cold open centering on characters you don't know and aren't particularly interesting was a very poor choice. The minion antics are what they are so go in knowing that, but there is surprisingly little of it. None of these movies are great but this one achieves something the others couldn't - it was boring. I didn't see the very end as my daughter wanted to go out and play in the little arcade, but this one was a let down of my already low expectations. A few chuckles - mainly the king fu training - but otherwise boring and missing what charm the previous entries of the franchise had.

2/10
Studios are getting to the stage where they don't understand "fun." It's amazing how many slam dunks are getting messed up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ManwithNoIdentity

Chili

What wind blew you hither?
Jun 10, 2004
8,650
4,679
1760-3.jpg

Casino Royale-1967

The wacky James Bond film. No real plot, just a jumble of skits in psychedelic sets with some great music and multiple 007s including David Niven (who Ian Fleming had in mind when he wrote Casino Royale, his first Bond book), Peter Sellers, Woody Allen and the 'first' Bond girl Ursula Andress. Lots of beautiful girls. Features the timeless song 'The Look of Love'. Mostly forgettable could have used a Mel Brooks touch (i.e. Get Smart) but some fun stuff, Peter Sellers scenes are the highlight.

frostnixonmovie.jpg

Frost/Nixon-2008

The famous interviews produced a play that the film is based on. Michael Sheen and Frank Langella were in the play and nicely reprise their roles for the film. Interesting to see all of the effort that went into just getting the interviews to take place. Watched the film years ago, this time read the book afterwards. Some stuff in the film is fiction. The book has some of the transcripts from the interviews (including the discussions on Watergate, Vietnam and Chile). The book also looks at Nixon's life afterwards. VGood film, enjoyed the book as well.

bb2778028292_944dbf5140.jpg

Clash by Night-1952

Mae (Barbara Stanwyck) comes back to her fishing village roots and seeking some security marries Jerry (Paul Douglas). Jerry's good friend Earl (Robert Ryan) who is in a bad marriage takes a shine to Mae. Ye olde love triangle develops. Fritz Lang seems to have gotten a fair bit by the censors of the period. Both Barbara Stanwyck and Marilyn Monroe are scantily clad at times and physically man handled by the men in the film. There's a lot of 'putting women in their place' dialogue. Reminded me of some pre code films. Interesting to see Marilyn in an early role, leads are all good.

patterns.jpg

Patterns-1956

'You either go along...or you get off'.

The corporate world with its own set of rules/politics. Where the boss is always right and has his favorites. His/her plans may or may not include you. Mr Ramsey (Everett Sloane) makes a great unwavering, ruthless boss. Bill Briggs (Ed Begley Sr.) is an aging exec, not on good terms with the boss. And Fred Staples (Van Heflin) is the new man, younger and clearly making an impression on Ramsey. Written by Rod Serling. Brilliant film, believe that a lot of the story is relevant today.
 
Last edited:

sr edler

gold is not reality
Mar 20, 2010
11,995
6,464
Casablanca (1942) by Michael Curtiz – 4.5/10

I didn't like this film very much. Second half was a little better than the first, but still way too much tendency towards farcical comedy for my liking with some of the side characters. I also didn't care much for Bogie's character, he came across as a bit of a douchebag. And yeah Ingrid Bergman is pretty, but I would have liked a little more edge or bite to her part, or her acting. Storyline also felt a little bit too contrived.

I think it's very much possible to have humorous elements in a supposedly serious film, but it's how you do it.

I also missed some locality. Casablanca is right on the Atlantic coast, but there are no shots of the port or the coastline. Instead the whole film is shot inside this boring café with jet set people, a sulking Bogart, and some other random douchebags.

At the end the only thing I could think about was this song by New Order

 

sr edler

gold is not reality
Mar 20, 2010
11,995
6,464
To Have and Have Not (1944) by Howard Hawks – 8/10

I liked this film a lot more than Casablanca. Way tighter atmosphere. Way more realistic atmosphere. And way less leaning towards farcical comedy, and this despite the fact that the main supporting character is a chronic drunkard with spasms and hiccups.

And while Lauren Bacall might not be a better actress than Ingrid Bergman, she still brings some kind of edge to her character. I also liked the music better, with Hoagy Carmichael.

NRs3O0C.jpg
 

Unholy Diver

Registered User
Oct 13, 2002
19,413
3,312
in the midnight sea
Minions: The Rise of Gru - 8/10

I don't get all the flak it is getting, I found it enjoyable, some great music and nostalgic pop culture throwbacks, if fit in just fine with the other films in the franchise, my daughter found it very humorous


Lightyear - 8.5/10

I've only seen maybe one of the Toy Story movies so I came in with a clean slate in my mind for the most part, and found it to be an enjoyable sci-fi adventure flick, my daughter enjoyed it, especially the vines that kept grabbing people
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,600
3,483
Sin City and Sin City: A Dame to Kill For. Reread all the source material over the last few months and wanted to revisit the movies. I think I reviewed the first of these two a few weeks back but can't remember. I liked it when it first came out. Still like it now though I've done a 180 on the Mickey Rourke performance (good then, bad now). It's a pretty engaging visual experiment and I like a lot of Miller's tough guy (and gal) dialogue, particularly when Clive Owen and Rosario Dawson are the ones spitting it. It's a self-aware impersonation of much better things and often plays like kids playing dress up, but I like that aspect of it.

Conversely, the sequel is just bleeeeeech. This is odd because they use the same basic template. There isn't an overarching reason why I consider one good and one bad, but that is indeed the case. They go wild with the color pops in this one for reasons beyond me. Color is used to specific effect in the books and first film, but it's so overused here it makes the entire visual scheme irritating. Several key performances feel really mailed in — Rourke, Alba, Dawson. Eva Green was made for this though.
 

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,600
3,483
Only the Brave. Been curious about this fire fighter drama for a while now after hearing/reading from multiple folks whom I trust that it's actually pretty good. It was the film Joseph Kosinski made prior to Top Gun: Maverick and with that on my mind, I finally tracked this one down. Gotta say ... I agree with the sentiment. There's a certain subgenre of movies about AMERICAN HEROES™ that I often bristle against that tell true life tales that portray stoic men's men selflessly sacrificed to some grand tragedy (nature, war) so the audience can get a cathartic cry into their Bud Lights before blasting off the backyard fireworks. (I'm in the Midwest, this is not strictly a July 4 occurrence). I'm thinking stuff like American Sniper. I'm thinking the cinematic ouvre of Mark Wahlberg and Peter Berg. I'm thinking corny low-budget religious tinged (if not overt) inspirational movies.

On the surface this IS some of that but what Only the Brave does that is so effective is that the ultimate tragedy (sorry, spoilers, I guess) is such a small part of the story. This is a story that is genuinely about these men and their families. You get to know them in their complexities — they are likable and skilled, but they're also stubborn and foolish. They're capable of being a hero one day and kinda a selfish prick the next. They aren't saints. They're people. And when tragedy does strike you're moved not by a manipulative music cue or a cliched crying scene or any filmmaking tricks, you're moved because you've grown to like these people over the proceeding two hours.

It has a lot of the cliches one would expect from a story like this but the cast is so skilled they make those beats work for the story not against it. Everything earned. Nothing cheap.
 

Rodgerwilco

Entertainment boards w/ some Hockey mixed in.
Feb 6, 2014
7,533
6,869
Casablanca (1942) by Michael Curtiz – 4.5/10

I didn't like this film very much. Second half was a little better than the first, but still way too much tendency towards farcical comedy for my liking with some of the side characters. I also didn't care much for Bogie's character, he came across as a bit of a douchebag. And yeah Ingrid Bergman is pretty, but I would have liked a little more edge or bite to her part, or her acting. Storyline also felt a little bit too contrived.

I think it's very much possible to have humorous elements in a supposedly serious film, but it's how you do it.

I also missed some locality. Casablanca is right on the Atlantic coast, but there are no shots of the port or the coastline. Instead the whole film is shot inside this boring café with jet set people, a sulking Bogart, and some other random douchebags.

At the end the only thing I could think about was this song by New Order


I'm disappointed you didn't like the film, one of my favorites since I've seen it. I can absolutely see where some of your criticisms are very valid, however.


Rick is an interesting character, I (as many other viewers I'm sure) was torn between rooting for him and wanting to smack him and tell him to stop being a debbie-downer. Major victim mentality, but he knows he holds power over people and uses it to sulk and make everyone feel bad for him.

As for the locality issue, I would have to agree fully with you here. The entire film was shot at the film studio in California and it is plainly obvious. The playwright who wrote the original story had never been to Casablanca and never wanted to go there, so that may have factored into this.
 

The Macho King

Back* to Back** World Champion
Jun 22, 2011
48,878
29,499
Wife chose the movie last night, so I was forced to watch

Giant (1956)

God I hate this movie. Taylor is given very little to do through the last two thirds of a very long movie. Hudson is just an uninteresting character to me in every way. Dean is the only character that I think really has what I would call an arc, and there's probably a better movie in here that focuses on him solely rather than having him be the B plot (to the extent there's a plot at all).

And that gets to my overall issue - I don't understand the point of this movie. Texas... changed? And we can see this change through the 30-some odd years of this movie through Hudson's family? Okay I guess. I don't think the characters are particularly interesting outside of Jett. And at the end there's this weird "redemption" for Hudson's character because his son marries a hispanic woman and... he doesn't make too big of a deal about it? I just can't find myself giving a shit about the legacy of some rich guy who was forced to get richer because his kids didn't want to take over his ranch so he started drilling for oil.

Some of the visuals in the movie are very much of the time (for some reason the swimming pool scenes which are clearly done on some California soundstage stand out to me), but I won't belabor that point because that's just studio filmmaking at the time, and to its credit there are some very good shots in the film (I think the first well Dean hits and the aftermath is a good example of that).

I don't know. This whole this is a meandering mess. It especially bothers me because I think Taylor and Dean especially can be tremendous actors but in this they just feel wasted by the inertia of the plot. There's some good shots in this, and I do think Dean gives a very good performance, but Taylor is wasted and Hudson is an uninteresting lead. It feels... too saccharine and it's trying to evoke an emotion in me of a time in which I feel no emotional connection to. There's probably an audience for this movie. I think it scratches a lot of the itches of Gone with the Wind, so if you like that you might like this too. I am definitely NOT that audience, though.

4/10 (personal 1/10 but trying to recognize some of the objective positives)
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan

Osprey

Registered User
Feb 18, 2005
27,542
10,185
As for the locality issue, I would have to agree fully with you here. The entire film was shot at the film studio in California and it is plainly obvious. The playwright who wrote the original story had never been to Casablanca and never wanted to go there, so that may have factored into this.

Also, there was a little conflict going on in North Africa at the time, so even if they'd wanted to film on location, they wouldn't have dared. Lots of films around that time had to make do with fake locations and require more imagination, Casablanca being one of the best examples.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rodgerwilco

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad