Movies: Last Movie You Watched and Rate it | {Insert Appropriate Seasonal Greeting Here}

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,875
11,145
Toronto
Rojek (2023) Directed by Zanye Akyol 7A (documentary)

Canada's submission to this year's Oscars for international film took me totally by surprise. Rojek is a documentary that focuses on Syria Kurdistan after the defeat of ISIS. In what appears to be an internment camp, several of jihadists are interviewed interspersed with footage of what is going on elsewhere in the camp where people continue to remain vigilant and prepare for more turmoil. Documentarian Zanye Akyol films these guys (and, surprisingly, gals) talking about why they do what they do. She just lets them tell their story. And many of the stories are chilling. Guys talk about their families, one even talks about pop songs. But, later, some of these same guys also talk about setting off car bombs, assassinating civilians and executing prisoners of war. The common thread among them is their fanatical fundamentalist belief that Islam demands jihad, demands that its followers kill heathens and non-believers as a duty to their religion. None of them regretted their personal action, nor saw themselves as responsible for their actions. After all, it was what their iman and other spiritual advisers told them to do as a duty to their faith. They were all confident that they would be rewarded in heaven for their loyalty to the Prophet while on Earth. As is true of other aggressive religious fundamentalists as well, the more fervour displayed in belief of an authoritarian god-figure, the more willing that person is to do horrible things to others in the name of blindly followed scripture.

I learned a lot about jihadism that I didn't know, which is a big benefit of Rojek. I was surprised by how diverse the ISIS soldiers were--it broke the stereotype that I had about Islam extremists. None of these people were foaming at the mouth; oddly and for whatever reason (torture?), all of them seemed to be willing to talk about their actions and beliefs, only clamming up when questions about wives came up. One prisoner said that if another man asked his wife's name, he would shoot him as a matter of honour. On the other hand, many of them seemed pretty normal people except for the hatred that their religion has provided against others who do not share their view of morality. I also found out that the ostensible good guys, the Syrian Kurdistan army units, had female regiments and, at least one woman seemed to hold a position of some power in the military hierarchy--including as an interrogator. Another female jihadist boasted she never felt freer than she was in the field, her fanaticism as fervent as her male counterparts. Near the end, one of the guys offered a thoughtful take on why he believed jihad would never end...that there was no mechanism in existence that would allow it to end. He said this with resignation, not anger. As much as I would argue with him regarding everything else, It is hard to disagree with him on that one.
 
Last edited:

93LEAFS

Registered User
Nov 7, 2009
34,187
21,388
Toronto
Poor Things (8/10)

This might be the hardest movie in recent memory I've seen and then tried to give a score. I turned to my friend after leaving saying I either saw the weirdest movie in awhile or I may have just seen a masterpiece. I legit had no idea what I was walking into, outside of it being big oscar bait film. What I got over the next 2 hours and 20 minutes, was absolutely hilarious at points, but also truly strange and dystopian. This is a movie I could give a much lower score on rewatch, or bump up. It's an interesting take on sci-fi. In many ways it's a frankenstein style tale mixed with comedy and Tim Burton esque situations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan

Pink Mist

RIP MM*
Jan 11, 2009
6,779
4,905
Toronto
Petite Maman (Céline Sciamma, 2021)

After the death of her beloved grandmother, eight-year-old Nelly meets a strangely familiar girl her own age in the woods. Instantly forming a connection with this mysterious new friend, Nelly embarks on a fantastical journey of discovery which helps her come to terms with this newfound loss.

With its time travelling plot, Petite Maman could have easily been a sci-fi film, but in the hands of Céline Sciamma it dances closer to magical realism or a fairytale. I think this works a lot better than being the positive episode from a season of Black Mirror. Sciamma uses suchma simple minimalistic story, but boy does it manage to pack a punch in its 73 minute runtime on grief and childhood awareness of adult struggles, while recreating the magic of childhood. Sciamma doesn't make a wrong step here (maybe could have done without the song near the end, which detracts from the minimalism? but that's a minor quibble), and I have no idea where she found those twins as she could not have cast them better. A beautifully tender film.



-------------------------------------------------------

Gone With the Wind (Victor Fleming, 1939)

The spoiled daughter of a Georgia plantation owner conducts a tumultuous romance with a cynical profiteer during the American Civil War and Reconstruction Era.

Gone With the Wind has many many many problems that are well documented so I don't really feel on touching on them, but the biggest problem for me is that it stopped being an engaging film after the first intermission and just dragged on and on and on. No idea why this is billed as a romance considering the leading couple loathes each other, and no idea why this is technically the most financially successful film of all time. What were 20th century audiences gaining from rerunning this in theatres for decades? The Technicolor, production design and costumes are absolutely gorgeous to look at though, so at least it has that going for it. But man do I wish the film was condensed a little bit.



-------------------------------------------------------

Carancho (Pablo Trapero, 2010)

Sosa is a lawyer who haunts hospital waiting rooms hoping to represent the victims of traffic accidents in insurance claims. When he falls in love with ambulance medic Lujan, he tries to leave this dark business but the shady law firm that he works for won’t let him off that easily.

Interesting premise, which follows an ambulance chasing lawyer in a country seemingly plagued by car accidents, but as the film goes on the plot gets more and more ridiculous. Occasionally thrilling, but more often than not just silly and unintentionally funny. Ricardo Darín is good, but he's basically playing the character he plays in every film, so he sleepwalks a bit through this role.



-------------------------------------------------------

Drifting Clouds / Kauas pilvet karkaavat (Aki Kaurismäki, 1996)

The ever-poker-faced Ilona loses her job as a restaurant hostess, as her tram driver husband, Lauri, also finds himself out of work. Together they must hit the streets of Helsinki, facing up to hardship and humiliation in their quest for survival, guided through the gloom by a ray of hope.

Searching for a job when unemployed is arguably the most humiliating experience an adult can go through. I remember going through a very long period of unemployment during the pandemic, sending out seemingly hundreds of applications, tens of screening interviews, and a handful of zoom interviews, just getting rejected again and again and again. Until at my wits end, I finally got a job offer. Drifting Clouds perfectly captures the feeling of frustration of chasing those dead ends, about to give up hope, and the feeling of elation when the hustle finally works out. A great slice of life film with a cast of slightly quirky characters but realistically grounded, played by the regular cast of Kaurismäki actors (sans Matti Pellonpää who was supposed to co-star but tragically died just before filming). I pretty much say this in every review of a Kaurismäki film, but its hard not to be inspired by the humanism he expresses in his film. No one expresses the desperation, depression, and that glimmer of hopefulness quite like him.

 

Unholy Diver

Registered User
Oct 13, 2002
20,204
3,862
in the midnight sea
Poor Things (8/10)

This might be the hardest movie in recent memory I've seen and then tried to give a score. I turned to my friend after leaving saying I either saw the weirdest movie in awhile or I may have just seen a masterpiece. I legit had no idea what I was walking into, outside of it being big oscar bait film. What I got over the next 2 hours and 20 minutes, was absolutely hilarious at points, but also truly strange and dystopian. This is a movie I could give a much lower score on rewatch, or bump up. It's an interesting take on sci-fi. In many ways it's a frankenstein style tale mixed with comedy and Tim Burton esque situations.

That's how I felt about The Lobster which was written and directed by Yorgos Lanthimos who directed Poor Things, though I don't know if I went as far as thinking it was a masterpiece, there were some tough scenes to get thru, and was not one I think I'll ever revisit

Poor Things has me intrigued a bit, but I think I'll wait for it to land on a streamer
 

Unholy Diver

Registered User
Oct 13, 2002
20,204
3,862
in the midnight sea
Wonka 8/10

When I first saw the trailer, I said to myself, "Do we really need another movie with Willy Wonka?" and after seeing it, I can answer that "Yes, we did need it" Chalamet was great as a young Wonka, singing, dancing, and still bringing enough kookiness to go along with a heartwarming story, definitely recommended
 

End of Line

Sic Semper Tyrannis
Mar 20, 2009
27,760
5,528
Wind River (2017) 8/10

Very well done film. After seeing that Taylor Sheridan produced it the casting choices for some made sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,731
5,529
LTWB_20220422_06540r.0.jpg


Leave the World Behind (2023) - 7/10

A family vacationing at a rental home tries to navigate the fallout of a major cyberattack.

Ethan Hawke and Julia Roberts star as Clay and Amanda Sandford, two New Yorkers who arrange an impromptu vacation at a luxurious rental house in Long Island. Along with their two children Archie (Charlie Evans) and Rose (Farrah Mackenzie), the Sandford's are enjoying their vacation until a number of unusual events begin happening: an unexplained incident at the beach; their phones stop working; the local wildlife start acting unusually. As the family tries to figure out what's going on, they're visited in the middle of the night by G.H. (Mahershala Ali) and Ruth (Myha'la Herrold) Scott, a father and daughter who claim the rental house is their home...

Leave the World Behind was written and directed by Sam Esmail. The film is based on a 2020 novel of the same name, written by Rumman Alam. A Netflix production, the film was executive produced by the Obama's Higher Ground Production Company (more on that later). How does it fare?

It's good, with flaws. Leave the World behind has a rock solid cast, which in addition to the above performers also features Kevin Bacon. The film has good performances, which is important because this is essentially a bottle movie with a budget; limited sets and characters. The characters themselves aren't necessarily great, but I thought the strong cast elevated the material. I also thought the film build dread well. It's an unnerving film that keeps you guessing, and despite a really lengthy run time (2h18m) never felt like it overstayed its welcome. It's also one of those films where you'll find yourself pondering what you'd do in the situation at hand.

My issues with the film primarily have to do with the writing, and specifically the dialogue. Leave the World Behind is a movie that is more about the message than the plot. It paints a scathing, yet hopeful portrait of American society. Unfortunately, at times it does so with dialogue that is so on-the-nose the characters may as well hold up a sign saying "subtext". There was also non-subtext dialogue which I thought was cringey; the most notable example being in the opening scene, when Amanda explains to Clay why she rented the house (i.e. told him a bunch of things he would logically know but the audience needs to learn about). Subtle is something this movie is not, which I think hurts it.

With that said, I don't disagree with's the film's analysis on society. In fact, in a case of life imitating art, there are conspiracy theories circling online that because Leave the World Behind was produced by the former president, that somehow it is a hidden message that something like this is about to happen for real. Theories like this mirror some of the themes of distrust and paranoia found in the movie. It's also worth noting the film's ending will likely leave many audience members feeling unsatisfied. I will admit to being one of those those members, as I wanted to see the story go on longer, but I will concede the movie got its point across.

Overall, Leave the World Behind is a good watch. I was on the fence about whether to go a 6 or 7 for this one, but I do think it's a slight cut above most movies out there. I couldn't find any budget information on the film, but it is currently the #1 trending movie on Netflix, so it has seemingly been a streaming success.
 

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,875
11,145
Toronto
The Captain (Io Capitano) (2023) Directed by Matteo Garrone 8A

Seydou and his best friend Moussa, both 16-years-olds, decide to leave Dakar and take a highly dangerous journey that will get them to Europe. They must cope with dishonest facilitators, bands of rebel outlaws, the threat of slavery, the Sahara desert itself, and finally a perilous sea journey across the Mediterranean in a rusted out boat if they are to reach Italy and a still uncertain future. Based on the actual accounts of African immigrants who made a desperate attempt to escape from poverty and oppression, director Matteo Garrone (Gomorrah; Dogman) creates a movie that both bears witness to the plight of thousands of people while at the same time being fast-paced, suspenseful and very entertaining. Seydou is played by amateur actor Seydou Sarr and he gives a marvelous performance as a really good if naive kid who does the right thing under the most difficult circumstances. I felt great sympathy for him. The rest of the movie is a mix of the best and the worst of humanity--both people whose greed drives them to cruel, unspeakable acts and people who try to help even when it is not in their best interests to do so. In a way, the movie is about this division of humanity. Few recent works have managed to provide a clearer depiction of the plight of many immigrants. The Captain is an eye-opener on many levels, but never preachy. I hope it makes the Academy Award's short list of international films as the film is extremely deserving of the honour.

subtitles


Best of '23 so far

1) Riceboy Sleeps, Shim, Canada
2) Anatomy of a Fall, Triet, France
3) Oppenheimer, Nolan, US
4) Poor Things, Lanthimos, US
5) El Conde, Larrain, Chile
6) Close Your Eyes, Erice, Spain
7) Io Capitoni, Garrone, Italy
8) Beyond Utopia, Gavin, US (documentary)
9) Barbie, Gerwig, US
10) Godzilla Minus One, Yamazaki, Japan
 
Last edited:

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,731
5,529
tango-and-cash-1989-sylvester-stallone-kurt-russellset-up-cops.jpg

Tango & Cash (1989) - 7/10

Two polar opposite LAPD detectives must work together after they're framed for murder.

Sylvester Stallone co-stars as Ray Tango, a yuppy detective working LA's Westside drug trade. Meanwhile, sloppy loose cannon Gabriel Cash (Kurt Russell) is working drugs from the Eastside. Both men are wildly successful, garnering recognition in the newspaper. Yves Perret (Jack Palance), a criminal kingpin, is losing millions as a result of both detective's successes. Rather than kill them and make them martyrs, Perret schemes to defame them by framing them for murder...

Tango & Cash was written by Andy Feldman. Andrei Konchalovsky directed most of the film, but was fired before the end of production due to conflicts with the producers, along with the film going over both budget and schedule. Albert Magnoli was brought in to finish directing the film, with second unit director Peter MacDonald also filling in. According to some sources, Stallone himself directed part of the film, and was the voice of reason holding the production together throughout. How did this hot mess of a production translate to the screen?

It's amazing. Before I lose my remaining shred of credibility: yes this is a horribly flawed movie, and yes I realize giving it a 7 may be blasphemous. Tango & Cash is popcorn entertainment; it has nothing to say, and exists solely for the explosions and witty dialogue. What puts it above the rest is it leans so heavily into its superficial strengths that it ends up being of the best examples of the both the action and "popcorn" genres.

The concept is extremely cliched, with two opposite personality type detectives reluctantly forced to work together. Russell is supposed to be the wildcard and Stallone the straight man, but this dynamic is blurred with Stallone constantly belting out one liners. Both action stars have the chance to shine in various car chase and gun fight sequences, and each has memorable one-liners. Jack Palance's Perret is a caricature of a villain, who is so cartoonishly evil you can't help but love him.

As for the plot itself, there is actually a lot going on. But despite the troubled shoot, the movie is easy to follow and moves at a brisk pace. There are all kinds of logic issues (why were Tango & Cash offered a plea deal when the prosecution had them dead to rights?), but with this type of movie they're easy to ignore. The film never takes itself too seriously, but doesn't ham things up to the point it's winking at the audience. Interestingly, the major conflict on set that lead to the firing of Konchalovsky was the tone of the movie. The producers wanted a gritty drama, while the ill-fated director wanted to make the buttery entertainment we got. The director was definitely correct, as this movie would've been a steaming pile of crap if it tried to play it straight (for crying out loud, it's a movie about two detectives named Tango and Cash).

My final thought about Tango & Cash is it almost plays as a parody of 80's action movies. I could totally see its plot being featured in a Key & Peele sketch, or whichever Lethal Weapon sequel they're on in It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia. The movie doesn't feel like imitation though; it feels like the culmination of every 80's buddy cop movie. Fitting, as this (and a couple other movies, like Born on the Fourth of July) was the last movie released in the 1980's, hitting theaters on December 22nd 1989.

Overall, Tango & Cash is buttery gold. If you love 80's action movies, then you've already seen it. If you don't, you'll probably hate this film. Hopefully you can at least appreciate the glorious soundtrack. Tango & Cash was a commercial success, earning $120M against its $54M budget.
 

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,772
3,808
Leave the World Behind. Several good performances (Ali, Hawke, Bacon) drown out by obnoxious film making. "Hey guys! Did you know a camera can go whooooooooo loookeee I'm above your head now! Wait, wait, now the camera is SIDEWAYS!!!! Yipppeee!! Oh .. oh I'm above our head now again!!" I can't recall the last time I've seen a director so in love with a camera angle as Sam Esmail is with overhead shots in this. JFC. Sit still and let your actors work, man. I'm torn on Julia Roberts here. I think she gives half a great performance. I applaud the willingness to make her unlikable but she stays stubborn about weird stuff she's witnessed with her own eyes for way too long. I know her being misanthropic and at least a tad racist is baked into her character from her opening speech ... but it shouldn't make her stupid.

Crank and Crank 2: HIgh Voltage. Now, there IS a time and place for showy director bullshit. These are those times. Hyperactive doesn't do justice to the cocaine fueled (one assumes) filmmaking here. Gleefully trashy. Gross. Arguably blatantly and openly offensive in parts. But there's an insane propulsion to this and a comic absurdity that the deepest darkest parts of me just cannot deny.

Killers of the Flower Moon. People bitched about the runtime and I'm certainly not immune to lobbing that criticism at many movies. But not this one. The lengthy runtime here is a feature, not a bug. That length makes you live in it — the evil, the sin, the simple and banal conspiracy of it all. There's no mystery here. We know the crime and perpetrators early on. But again, that's the point. It's the length that makes it worse, underlines how horrible this was. This is insidious. Perpetrated by family and friends and neighbors. A tighter, more "thrilling" movie could've been done (and almost was if you know the backstory), but I applaud the direction they ultimately went.

Leonardo DiCaprio is an actor who I've long thought was overrated but has really done a good job in stretching himself in the latter part of this career. This is among his best peformances. Younger Leo would've never allowed himself to play such a venal, confused wimp as he is here and he has the grace and good sense to stay a step back when Lily Gladstone is blowing him off the screen (by design).
 

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,875
11,145
Toronto
Leave the World Behind. Several good performances (Ali, Hawke, Bacon) drown out by obnoxious film making. "Hey guys! Did you know a camera can go whooooooooo loookeee I'm above your head now! Wait, wait, now the camera is SIDEWAYS!!!! Yipppeee!! Oh .. oh I'm above our head now again!!" I can't recall the last time I've seen a director so in love with a camera angle as Sam Esmail is with overhead shots in this. JFC. Sit still and let your actors work, man. I'm torn on Julia Roberts here. I think she gives half a great performance. I applaud the willingness to make her unlikable but she stays stubborn about weird stuff she's witnessed with her own eyes for way too long. I know her being misanthropic and at least a tad racist is baked into her character from her opening speech ... but it shouldn't make her stupid.

Crank and Crank 2: HIgh Voltage. Now, there IS a time and place for showy director bullshit. These are those times. Hyperactive doesn't do justice to the cocaine fueled (one assumes) filmmaking here. Gleefully trashy. Gross. Arguably blatantly and openly offensive in parts. But there's an insane propulsion to this and a comic absurdity that the deepest darkest parts of me just cannot deny.

Killers of the Flower Moon. People bitched about the runtime and I'm certainly not immune to lobbing that criticism at many movies. But not this one. The lengthy runtime here is a feature, not a bug. That length makes you live in it — the evil, the sin, the simple and banal conspiracy of it all. There's no mystery here. We know the crime and perpetrators early on. But again, that's the point. It's the length that makes it worse, underlines how horrible this was. This is insidious. Perpetrated by family and friends and neighbors. A tighter, more "thrilling" movie could've been done (and almost was if you know the backstory), but I applaud the direction they ultimately went.

Leonardo DiCaprio is an actor who I've long thought was overrated but has really done a good job in stretching himself in the latter part of this career. This is among his best peformances. Younger Leo would've never allowed himself to play such a venal, confused wimp as he is here and he has the grace and good sense to stay a step back when Lily Gladstone is blowing him off the screen (by design).
I, too, went for a long time thinking DiCaprio was overrated, but from The Wolf of Wall Street on, I think that position is now totally untenable. I find that what I dislike in his performances almost always turns out to have more to do with his willingness to show his characters' flaws honestly than with any shortcoming on his part as an actor.
 

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,875
11,145
Toronto
Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget (2023) Directed by Sam Fell 4A

It has taken 23 years for the sequel to the original Chicken Run to arrive, and it is a big disappointment. Having escaped their confines in the World War II movie-themed original, Ginger and Rocky, now with their child Molly in tow, and the rest of the chickens face a new challenge in the form of Mrs. Tweedy who wants to turn them all into chicken nuggets. Aardman Animation has never seemed so uninspired and ordinary. The story lacks the wit and insouciance of the original, and the colour scheme of the animation has gone from being perfectly realized to that god-awful computer generated, unnatural dreck that seems to be taking over from nature in most animated movies. It's not that Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nuggets doesn't have moments that will make you smile or be impressed with the animation, it is just that taken as a whole, the movie seems so much like Saturday morning cartoon fare. It suffers from the same curse that many other Netflix movies succumb to: middling blandness that never seems to have the ambition to be anything else.
 

sdf

Registered User
Jan 23, 2015
2,233
393
Rostov on Don
Watched a few "classics".... :sarcasm:

Highlander is a pretty dumb film, with bad editing and terrible acting [2.5/10]. Highlander II is even dumber, with still bad editing and acting (still a little better than the first). It's played less seriously so it has a few "chill" moments, but it makes zero freakin' sense in continuity to the first film [2/10]. Men At Work offers very few laughs throughout and is not very efficient at any level, but the brothers are cool and they were the most enjoyable "throwback" of these rewatch [3/10]. Escape From New York is an overrated film that is also pretty dumb (still a masterpiece compared to the Highlander films), I never was a big fan, but it does have that Carpenter je-ne-sais-quoi [4.5/10].
There are moments in this movie that might seem funny today, like the guy from the first fight who is so cool that he suddenly started using back flips instead of walking, shocking even Christopher Lambert's character, the mound sword, which raises the assumption that he stole it from the children's toys section, and all these fireworks depicting sparks, but in general, this movie is much better than such cheap garbage as Hellriser that you like so much. I'm afraid that you just don't have the right perception, which doesn't allow you to understand what is good about these popular old movies
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pranzo Oltranzista

Pranzo Oltranzista

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
3,981
2,900
There are moments in this movie that might seem funny today, like the guy from the first fight who is so cool that he suddenly started using back flips instead of walking, shocking even Christopher Lambert's character, the mound sword, which raises the assumption that he stole it from the children's toys section, and all these fireworks depicting sparks, but in general, this movie is much better than such cheap garbage as Hellriser that you like so much. I'm afraid that you just don't have the right perception, which doesn't allow you to understand what is good about these popular old movies
Hmmm. Obviously I first thought that you questioning my intelligence and knowledge certainly was very high compliment, but then I realized that this was by far the most articulated and coherent post I had ever read from you, and that you must have used 100% of your brain to write it, and just to come after little me, so I felt even more special. So thanks.

That being said, while telling me I couldn't understand what is good about that film, you only underline elements that could "seem funny today". You are of no help at all, so I'll stick to my comment: that's a dumb film. I never said anywhere you couldn't enjoy dumb films, I know I do.

My comments on all Hellraiser films can be found here, if anybody is curious.
 

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,772
3,808
The funniest thing about Highlander will always be that they cast the most famous Scottish actor ever as an Egyptian/Spanish immortal. In a movie called Highlander. Which actually takes place partially in Scotland.

Amazing stuff.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: kihei and OzzyFan

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,772
3,808
I, too, went for a long time thinking DiCaprio was overrated, but from The Wolf of Wall Street on, I think that position is now totally untenable. I find that what I dislike in his performances almost always turns out to have more to do with his willingness to show his characters' flaws honestly than with any shortcoming on his part as an actor.
Yep, I'd put that change at that same point.

My big complaint was that I think a lot of his career he's played basically the same guy. He does 10 movies between Catch Me if You Can and The Wolf of Wall Street and I feel like with the exception of Django Unchained, they're all varying degrees of man with DEMONS. He's not bad in any of them (hmm, well maybe J. Edgar), but most of them weren't that interesting to me. Very samey. The Revenant came after this run, but I'd lump it into this category too.

Otherwise since Wolf, he's done Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (my pick for his best performance) and Killers of the Flower Moon, both of which I think are his most complex and interesting performances. Now he is pretty bad in the atrociously awful Don't Look Up (everyone is) but even here I at least applaud his attempt to do something different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kihei and OzzyFan

The Macho King

Back* to Back** World Champion
Jun 22, 2011
49,082
30,020
Heard nothing but rave reviews of this film and we tried but just couldn't. It was said to be hilarious but it was just very annoying.

View attachment 786317
You can apply this to almost his entire filmography.

I watched Jack Reacher. I'll give it a 6/10 as an enjoyable, empty calorie film. After seeing the series, Tom Cruise as Reacher is kind of hilarious.
 

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,875
11,145
Toronto
Yep, I'd put that change at that same point.

My big complaint was that I think a lot of his career he's played basically the same guy. He does 10 movies between Catch Me if You Can and The Wolf of Wall Street and I feel like with the exception of Django Unchained, they're all varying degrees of man with DEMONS. He's not bad in any of them (hmm, well maybe J. Edgar), but most of them weren't that interesting to me. Very samey. The Revenant came after this run, but I'd lump it into this category too.

Otherwise since Wolf, he's done Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (my pick for his best performance) and Killers of the Flower Moon, both of which I think are his most complex and interesting performances. Now he is pretty bad in the atrociously awful Don't Look Up (everyone is) but even here I at least applaud his attempt to do something different.
The champion in the "men with DEMONS" category has to be Philip Seymour Hoffman. No trouble with differentiating one character from another for him. On the other hand, I think Joaquin Phoenix has a similar problem now to what DiCaprio had then.
 

BigBadBruins7708

Registered User
Dec 11, 2017
14,593
20,024
Las Vegas
The champion in the "men with DEMONS" category has to be Philip Seymour Hoffman. No trouble with differentiating one character from another for him. On the other hand, I think Joaquin Phoenix has a similar problem now to what DiCaprio had then.

True but Hoffman has a lot of comedy roles in there too, even in the string of serious roles. Twister, Almost Famous, Boogie Nights, Big Lebowski, Along Came Polly, The Invention of Lying (cameo)
 

Pranzo Oltranzista

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
3,981
2,900
Godzilla Minus One (Yamazaki, 2023) - This one really would deserve a longer comment from me, but I'm in a very lazy phase, so I'll keep it short. My reaction to seeing Oppenheimer was to go back and watch a handful of other films related to Hiroshima, including a few of the older Japanese ones. Godzilla does a very good job at echoing these films, without doing too much. The black rain, radiation sickness, survivor's guilt, it's all alluding to these previous entries (there's even a direct quotation of the original creature's roar), making this monster movie a lot more relevant than it should be. I really didn't enjoy the overacting and overdone pathos and sentimentality (the little crowd tonight ended mocking the film at the "big reveal" of Noriko being alive - and I can't really blame them), but other than that, a pretty fun one. 5/10

Sympathy for the Devil
(Adler, 2023) - I've also seen this. Like most Cage vehicle, there's that over-the-top performance, you like it or you don't. Not much apart from that. It's an ok film, original enough I guess, even if somewhat predictable. 3.5/10
 

CDJ

Registered User
Nov 20, 2006
57,341
47,904
Hell baby
Seen a couple since I last checked in:

Thanksgiving (2023 Eli Roth)

8.7/10


What can I say? I’m a sucker for Horror-Comedy. I loved this movie and was glad to hear a sequel’s coming in 2025. Patrick Dempsey is the most notable performer on the cast but thought the young cast did a great job too. Loved seeing Tim Dillon in it. Think a modern day, Masshole version of Scream. Eli Roth per usual was over the top with the gore, to the point where it was hilarious. It is NOT a Hostel kind of gore so no need to worry about that if that’s not your thing.

Dream Scenario (2023 Kristoffer Borgli)

7.6/10


What a weird f***ing movie man. Nic Cage has really found his space in recent years with these types of weird movies (The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent, Mandy, Willys Wonderland just off the top of my head). You’ll see it described as a black comedy fantasy, but there are some horror elements to it too. Also starring Michael Cera and Julianne Nicholson, the premise is that Nic Cage plays a doofus science professor who starts randomly appearing in everybody’s dreams. At first he embraces his newfound stardom but soon he finds out it’s not all that it’s cracked up to be. It’s a movie that covers topics like celebrity and cancel culture in a way that isn’t contrived imo. I walked out of the movie wondering wtf did I just watch but not in a bad way. I got home and my dog had gotten into the trash and was sick so overall the movie wasn’t worth $500 I ended up spending at the vet (he is fine) but probably worth a $12 ticket or whatever it is in your area. This is a movie that is not for everybody, some people will love it and others will think it’s trash. I merely like it. I love me some Cage though. His performance was tremendous, wouldn’t shock me if he gets an Oscar nomination.
 

Bahama Mama

Sunny days
Oct 12, 2022
172
310
Winding Bay
You can apply this to almost his entire filmography.

I watched Jack Reacher. I'll give it a 6/10 as an enjoyable, empty calorie film. After seeing the series, Tom Cruise as Reacher is kind of hilarious.
I'm surprised as he's regarded as a genius. If all similar,can pass I suppose but who does his movies appeal to?

Never saw the series but enjoyed the films.

WE are on a poor string of bad movies that are highly touted.

Purple rain, tried and had to stop.

Rebel without a cause,expected it to be better considering the hype but not great at all and a bit ridiculous seeing such old actors playing teens.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad