Movies: Last Movie You Watched and Rate it | {Insert Appropriate Seasonal Greeting Here}

Pink Mist

RIP MM*
Jan 11, 2009
6,779
4,905
Toronto
Ratcatcher (Lynne Ramsay, 1999)

12-year-old James Gillespie lives on a Glasgow housing estate during the 1973 refuse collectors’ strike. After James’ friend falls into a canal and drowns, James becomes increasingly withdrawn. As bags of rubbish pile up and rats move in, James starts to spend time with Margaret Anne, a vulnerable 14 year old expressing a need for love in all the wrong ways, and Kenny, who possesses an unusual innocence in spite of the harsh surroundings.

Easy to call Lynne Ramsay's debut feature social realism or to classify Ratcatcher under the British Kitchen Sink realism movement. While it certainly has many traits of it, I think the film is a lot more poetic than those traditions with Ratcatcher's touches of surrealism in the grim Glasgow setting. The squalor of Glasgow is depressing of course, but Ramsey portrays some touching moments of working class childhood, particularly with the dreams to escape it - riding the bus to the countryside and a new housing project, sending a mouse to the moon etc. Also beautiful tender moments of youthful love, such as a bath scene between James and Margaret Anne (something that would be difficult to get away with filming these days). I really loved this one, I thought it full of a sense of wonder and curiosity towards childhood/growing up, and full of compassion and love for its characters, rather than grim and depressing like many people have found.


The Color Wheel (Alex Ross Perry, 2009)

JR, an aspiring news-anchor, forces her younger brother Colin to embark on a road trip to move her belongings out of her professor-turned-lover’s place. Traveling through New England, they uncomfortably run into old school-mates or revisit familial history from which they have long since diverged.

Your miles will vary with The Color Wheel depending on your tolerance for 2000s mumblecore films about privileged twenty somethings in the US Northeast, but I though the film captured the feeling of being a lost recently graduated student watching all your peers go off to do better things while feeling stuck in a rut having your dreams slip away - a feeling I am all too familiar with. The estranged brother and sister relationship also feels believable (at least up until the ending, which is a bit of a twist), even if the dialogue seems a little too rehearsed and overwritten. Shot in beautiful black and white 16mm.


City Lights (Charlie Chaplin, 1931)

A lovable tramp falls for a blind woman who sells flowers on the street and who mistakes him for a millionaire. Upon learning that she and her grandmother are to be evicted, the tramp undertakes a series of attempts to provide them with the money they need, all of which end in humiliating failure.

Somehow my first Chaplin film - big blindspot of mine. City Lights is considered by many to be his best, and I feel a little underwhelmed? I can appreciate lots of it - a few years into the sound era he's making a silent picture and sticking his thumb at the transition to sound, it has big choregraphed scenes, lots of pathos throughout. But I don't know, I felt like the story was a little undercooked, like a skeleton of a story to get us from place A to B. Furthermore, many of the gags, while funny, went on for far too long when making an earlier exit would have been more refined. As mentioned, the Chaplin film that I've seen, but based off the experience of the great silent clowns, I think I prefer Buster to Charlie


Undine (Christian Petzold, 2020)

Undine is a historian and tour guide at the Berlin City Museum specializing in urban development, while Christoph is an industrial diver. Linked by a love of the water, the two form an intense bond, which can only do so much to help Undine overcome the considerable baggage of her former affair.

My second time watching Undine and I caught it as part of the TIFF retrospective on Petzold. Love how Petzold plays with the Undine myth as a tale of new and lost romance and identity, and my appreciation of the film grew in my rewatch now that I have a little bit of a background on the myth. Has two great performances by Paula Beer and Franz Rogowski (one of my favourite contemporary actors). Also a great film to learn more about the history of Berlin (one of my favourite cities) as it goes into a deep dive of the history of the city through urban planning.
 

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,875
11,145
Toronto
Did you catch any of the screenings at TIFF Lightbox this month for the Christian Petzold retrospective they're doing? They've been screening basically all his films he's made, including most of his early films
No, I haven't been paying attention. Just found out about the retrospective a couple of days ago. Don't think I've seen his first three or four films either.
 

blundluntman

Registered User
Jul 30, 2016
3,169
3,449
Unfortunately, I wasted $30 watching that Ridley Scott Napoleon movie. I've never walked out of a movie before but I couldn't sit through it for the life of me. It should've been called "My d*** is small so I wanna take over France". I give it a 1/10.

However, Killer of the Flower Moon was absolutely amazing and could've been 5 hrs long and I wouldn't have minded one bit. It's strange how opposite Scorsese and Scott seem to be going direction wise considering they both did historic pieces this year. I give this one an 8.5/10
 

PK Cronin

Bailey Fan Club Prez
Feb 11, 2013
34,533
23,964
Donnie Brasco:

This is one that I had missed along the way so I decided to give it a go. I really didn't get why it was critically acclaimed (at least I think it was) because it's rather simple and very similar to other movies in the genre. The acting was good/great at times and others it was mediocre or phony feeling. I never felt much tension during the story and it just felt very one note. I do enjoy Michael Madsen though so it was nice to see him.

Certainly wasn't a bad movie but not something I'd ever care to put on again. I'd give it a 7/10 but I'll stick with Goodfellas for my mob re-watch.

The Many Saints of Newark:

After watching Brasco I decided to watch this one even though it got less than stellar reviews. I was interested to see what they did with such an iconic television show and how Michael Gandolfini did. I was disappointed. It felt nothing like The Sopranos and many of the actors playing younger versions of the characters we know felt very forced and like caricatures. It didn't really go anywhere of significance and seemed afraid to actually tackle anything worthwhile, so it just wasn't compelling. I'll stick with the original on this one too. I'd give this a 4/10.
 

Nakatomi

Registered User
Dec 26, 2022
156
200
Going All the Way (1997) - 7/10
A pre-fame Ben Affleck is one of the leads in this interesting 90s version of a book from the 70s based off the author's life in the 50s. I had not heard of this film but a more definitive director's cut came out last year that lengthened the film a bit and added some more depth and complexity to it.

Two young men return from serving in Korea and are trying to make their way in a very conservative 1950's America. One had been a stud, a big man on campus, and he seemed to be very impacted by Japanese Zen Buddhism and now seeks to find a little more meaning than just being everyone's favorite jock. Though that meaning does still involve a lot of chasing skirts. This is Affleck's character. The other is a quiet, picked on young man who Affleck seems to project a lot of depth onto that may or may not have a basis in reality. This character is portrayed by Jeremy Davies.

Rachel Weisz and Rose McGowan also have roles here.


An interesting article from about a year ago when the revamped version came out, includes this note:
It was at Sundance in 1997, when McGowan was there to promote the movie, that Harvey Weinstein allegedly assaulted her in a hotel room, as The New York Times reported in 2017. What was supposed to be a business meeting became a traumatizing encounter with one of cinema's kingmakers, one with ripples that would be felt for decades.

Anyway, Affleck definitely oozes charisma and you can really see his potential as a future "movie star" here. The film has some flaws, but I think is worth a watch. As noted, I had never seen the original cut of this, but the version available now is absolutely gorgeous and looks phenomenal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shadow1 and OzzyFan

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,875
11,145
Toronto
KUOLLEET-LEHDET-2-copy.webp


Fallen Leaves (2023) Directed by Aki Kaurismaki 6B

Finnish director Aki Kaurismaki makes movies about the socially downtrodden, but with a difference. His approach is to avoid the kitchen sink realism of British directors like Mike Leigh and Ken Loach and substitute it with a wickedly droll, pared down, gently comic style that finds his protagonists struggling against authority figures but in the end almost always if not winning than at least holding their own. This year's Jury Prize winner at Cannes, Fallen Leaves is a very off-beat romance that focuses on two isolated, lonely people, Ansa and Holappa, both out of work for different reasons. Their lives are unrelentingly bleak but they find one another, sort of, and after several false starts there is a chance that they might actually end up sharing life's many travails rather than being overwhelmed by them on their own.

Our protagonists are pared down and not especially expressive. Deadpan line deliveries rule the day interspersed with some funny bits and some dialogue that is almost surreal as when two movie-going strangers compare Jim Jarmusch's zombie movie The Dead Don't Die to Godard's Pierrot le Feu and Bresson's Diary of a Country Priest. Ansa and Holappa's plight is handled with characteristic humanity and empathy. And Kaurasmaki ability to shape the narrative to fit his style is impressive. If indeed that is always a good thing, and in this case I am not so sure that it is. The stripped down, minimalist approach seems in danger of creating caricatures of Ansa and Holappa rather than fully formed characters. Part of their emotional complexity seems compromised. They remain interesting, but lack the multi-dimensionality necessary to create a full emotional connection, for me, anyway. In many ways Fallen Leaves, an apt title considering our protagonists' circumstances, is a wonderful movie and critics love it (it's riding at 99% on RT). But it fell a little short of my admittedly high expectations.

subtitles
 
Last edited:

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,772
3,808
The Mirror Crack'd. An all-star Agatha Christie Miss. Marple adaptation in the vein of the assorted 70s/80s Poirot adaptations. As with those, this has a steady British hand at the helm (Guy Hamilton of assorted Bond movies and one of those Poirots) and an odd mixed bag final result. As with the Peter Ustinov Poirot movies vs. the David Suchet TV movies I found myself drawn to that deep supporting cast, while not totally vibing with our central sleuth. These productions are excuses to dust off some ol' pros, wind them up and let them roll through a scene or two or three. No exceptions to that front here. Rock Hudson carries most of the dramatic/emotional burden with aplomb while Tony Curtis and Kim Novak get the over-the-top fun. Edward Fox's sly inspector also leaves an impression. But Angela Lansbury's Marple leaves me wanting. Too aggressive and brash (comparatively) versus Joan Hickson's much subtler and gentler approach on the TV movies that would come a few years later. There's a budget and depth TV can't match, but it was hard for me not to miss my preferred portrayal. This does open with a fun fakeout and good piece of character table-setting created for the movie I quite liked.

The Counselor. I'd say I'm back on my bullshit, but I've always been here. There's a vocal online minority that defends this mean lil' Ridley Scott flop and I am proud to say I'm a card carrying inaugural member! We have a handshake and secret code and everything! Revisited again and my opinion remains unchanged. It's Ridley doing a Michael Mann movie (or a Tony Scott movie, but I actually think Mann is more apt), but instead of showcasing professionalism and competence, these protagonists are all naively in over their heads. Arrogant, horny, greedy dudes who swagger with the confidence of men in control, only realizing too late that they not only aren't in control, they maybe never were. The plot is some standard issue drug dealer stuff, but what really makes it sing is the cold philosophizing of Cormac McCarthy's script. Everybody speaks in McCarthy's barbbed wisdom, but Ruben Blades in particualr gets a hell of a speech toward the end. An evil man but with the gentle manner of a wisened grandfather sharing an important life lesson to a misbehaving grandchild. One criticism is that Michael Fassbender is too cool a customer to sell the emotion he needs to sell. I can see that, but he's such a surface driven character I kinda feel he's almost acting how he feels he needs to act. But maybe I'm giving too much benefit of the doubt. Cameron Diaz is a lot of fun in this, but I'm not totally sure she pulls off the role. But she doesn't miss by much.

The Queen. One of two celebrated, Best Picture nominated movies I watched this weekend that begat TV series that are more popular and better remembered than the movies that led to them. (The Crown in this case. Gosford Park which led to Downton Abbey is the other). Watched this after watching The Crown's epsiode that also covers the aftermath of Princess Di's death. What struck me in this rewatch of The Queen was how ... funny it is. Might seem odd and my memory didn't hold it in that regard, but rewatching and despite the inciting incident, it's almost this political comedy of errors. The tension at the heart of the story is Queen Elizabeth and the monarchy being stuck in the old/traditional ways and not grasping the reality of the situation vs. the more modern Tony Blair ever so gently trying to help them get to the place they need to be for their own good. But their obstienance and Blair's exasperation plays like humor to me more than drama. I've had a fond memory of it, but even more so now. Could easily be dismissed as stodgy awards bait, but it doesn't play like that at all to me. A much more lively and interesting film.
 

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,772
3,808
To those who've watched The Killer there's something that's been on my mind.

I've read a few things and listened to some podcasts from various film folk who I like and enjoy. And something about this move has come up repeatedly and I just don't agree with it it. Curious what others think ...

Is the protagonist bad at his job?

I've heard and read this point made several times and I very strongly disagree with it. I absolutely agree that he isn't AS GOOD as he thinks he is and the narration certainly paints him as either a liar or someone who doesn't actually understand themselves, which I think is part of the humor.

But there's a gap between being not "as good" and being "bad."

The evidence for him being bad seems to be: 1) he misses the shot 2) he misjudges how long the guy he shoots with the nailgun will live 3) doesn't drug the dog right 4) the brute character gets the jump on him and beats him up.

I'll even admit I kept clocking how often he's sleeping in a car right outside his target's home, which seems pretty conspiculous though that doesn't seem to come to anything.

But I'd counter with this: He wins. Clearly. He succeeds at every single turn. It's not a smooth ride — which I do think is an important point that I'll circle back to momentarily. But he obviously, unequivicolly wins. He vanquishes every villain and loose end except the one he can't, but that's left in a place where the man seems appropriately cowed.

Maybe I'm just being too pedantic about this?

The other thing that's come up in analysis is the reading that it's autobiographical for Fincher himself. He's The Killer. I don't disagree! It's a fun reading. But if you believe both the former and latter, do you then believe Fincher thinks he's bad at his job? I'm sure Fincher would reject any autobiographical reading regardless, but if it is intentional (and there's a case to be made) I can't believe he's saying "I'm actually bad at this." That just doesn't track to me.

If anything, if you want to follow that line of thinking, I think he might be saying the job "i.e. the movie industry" is inherently chaotic and messy and that maybe planning, determination and luck is the best you can do to hope to survive. I think the job is hard and no one gets through unscathed despite best efforts.

P.S. I am not a crackpot.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: shadow1

Nakatomi

Registered User
Dec 26, 2022
156
200
I just finished The Killer, and come down with kihei on it. After the opening scene, I was ready to be wowed, but was overall left feeling meh about it. Oh well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kihei

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,875
11,145
Toronto
I haven't thought about The Killer since I saw it. I kind of see the point of the "he's bad at his job" reading, but it didn't occur to me at the time and it makes no difference to me now.

My favourite Miss Marple is Margaret Rutherford by a country mile. K, if you can find any of her Marple movies, I'm pretty sure you would enjoy them.

And by the way, why is The Killer now spelled The K--.ller?
 

Osprey

Registered User
Feb 18, 2005
27,924
10,808
And by the way, why is The Killer now spelled The K--.ller?
Because the 'i' was shot in the head, had his brains splattered on the nearest 'l' and is now lying dead in his own blood. Cute, huh?

thekiller2.jpg
 

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,875
11,145
Toronto
Riders Of Justice. 7/10 Either the Danes enjoy dark humour as much as I do or I’m a sociopath as I laughed all the way through it.
Made my top 20 for the year in 2020. I laughed a lot, too,
 

flyersnorth

Registered User
Oct 7, 2019
4,690
7,158
Riders Of Justice. 7/10 Either the Danes enjoy dark humour as much as I do or I’m a sociopath as I laughed all the way through it.

I really enjoyed it too - plus anything with Mads is an automatic watch for me.

If you enjoy that kind of scandinavian dark humour, check our Norsemen if you haven't already - a very satirical and absurd viking series on Netflix.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kihei

flyersnorth

Registered User
Oct 7, 2019
4,690
7,158
Anatomy of a Fall, 9/10 (French)

Loved this one. A family shaken by the death of a husband, where the wife is the primary suspect and the only other witness is their blind son.

I really enjoyed the tight dialogue, and production choices. I am a huge fan of movies with no score whatsoever other than the sounds authentically present in the scene. This was a great decision.

I was captivated for the entire 2.5 hours. Well worth a watch if you enjoy exploration into relationships and their breakdown.
 

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,772
3,808
Exterminator 2. As an 80s child, I've always had a soft spot for Cannon's catalog of often entertaining (though not always "good") movies. See also: previous comments about Sam Firstenberg and his assorted ninja and vigilante movies. Some brave soul put together a three-volume Cannon Film Guide. I just wrapped volume one and have been going back to movies I either hadn't seen in a while or have never seen. This one, an 80s VHS cover Hall of Famer with its helmet-clad, flamethrower-wielding hero, is the latter for me.

This clean-up-the-streets vigilante tale is allllllmost genuinely good. The fatal flaw is the lead actor who is such a dead fish. Unappealing. Zero personality. Not funny, likable or even really that sympathetic. But if you can hold your nose for the scenes when he's out of his vigilante garb, there's a ton to like. You got a great, big Mario Van Pebbles villain performance leading a group of Mad Max-ripoff punks that include a roller skater and breakdancers (it was the 80s!). Frankie Faison plays the hero's garbage man sidekick so likably you wish he were the hero. The synthy 80s score sounds like a video game (this is a positive to me). The action is, appropriately ridiculous, and downright grimy in some moments.

Fun trivia: Cannon didn't make Exterminator. As they did with Death Wish, they bought the rights to sequelize it. The credited director was bad and had to be replaced. Most of the masked vigilante stuff was directed by the replacement and without the lead (who hated the outfit/mask). So niether the director nor the lead actor are responsible for what are unequivolcally the best parts of the movie. This filmed in a warehouse literally next door to the warehouse/factory where James Cameron was filming Terminator at the same time. Bills to the Terminator production were accidently sent to Exterminator 2.
 

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,875
11,145
Toronto
screenshot-2023-11-08-at-3-15-13-pm-654bec59d8e57.png


The Holdovers (2023) Directed by Alexander Payne 4A

Paul Hunham (Paul Giamatti) is a curmudgeonly prof at an elite New England prep school. Come Christmas break he is assigned the onerous task of looking after the students who will not be going home for Christmas. Initially there are five of them, but as though the movie had second thoughts, the plot quickly boils down to one student, 17-year-old Angus Tully (newcomer Dominic Sessa) a bit of a rebel with major family issues. The Holdovers simply encapsulates their relationship over the holidays before coming to a not-so-surprising conclusion.

Giamatti and Sessa are fine, but the movie is one long fishing expedition. The operative word is "meander" because The Holdovers just meanders from scene to scene as though the movie is trying to find something that works. You could actually switch some of the scenes around and you would hardly notice any disruption in the narrative, such as it is. Director Alexander Payne seems to be trying to make a highbrow Christmas movie but his attempt is scuttled by all the middlebrow conventions from a different era that the script is saddled with, some of them cringe-worthy. For instance in this den of academia the wisest, most perceptive person in the movie is Mary Lamb, the boarding school's black chief cook, whose son has been killed in Viet Nam. The movie is set in 1970 possibly because people would avert their eyes if the movie took place in the present and tried to create a black character to fit such a contrived role. Payne's intent might not have been to be patronizing, but it left a bad taste in my mouth. I don't think that I have seen an Alexander Payne movie yet that didn't ring false to me at some point, and The Holdovers is no exception.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad