@Shareefruck I think it depends on what you're looking for in music, man. You are absolutely right that there isn't a Beatles-level act in terms of combination popular-appeal and musical genius in the years since, but that is hardly to say that there haven't been countless acts whose musical genius is equivalent.
The era of the rockstar as culture-setter is over, as there are simply too many disparate priorities in music to have one act in one genre speak to the entirety of musical taste. Just take a look at those polls that we've been conducting on the Best Album from given years - you'll have posters who, thread after thread, extoll a love
only for heavy metal, or
only for hip-hop, or
only for experimental and avant-garde music. Back when the Beatles were king, you would neither have the ubiquity of such diverse music, nor would you have the platform to offer that opinion. In that era, what made
Revolver or
Abbey Road better than, say,
Lola Versus the Powerman, Fairport Convention, or Gal Costa? My ears say very, very little, beyond popular sentiment.
And if I'm comparing it to nowadays or recent-year acts, what makes the Beatles catalogue better than that of Bjork, MF Doom, The Cure, or Tim Hecker? I guess you could argue fewer 'misses', but the zeniths are just as creative, venturesome, and transcendent. As for Autechre - I think I need to put more effort in there, because I don't really see it. Kinda like Beefheart.