Lane Hutson, can have the same impact of Q.Hughes//Makar?

[TruePowerSlave]

Nope

Makar for example is going for his 5th straight Norris nomination in his 6th season. Are we really expecting Hutson to reach that level?

 

[FriendlyGhost92]

When you go full homer and pretend he's Cale Makar but he's really more Shayne Gostisbehere...

 

[Metroid]

Needs a 6th option: No, he's just ok

 

[Barsky]

Where's the option for "just a meh, undersized 3rd pairing D"?

 

[Xirik]

the obvious option.

 

[The Gr8 Dane]

This is why we get a bad rep.

 

[Zegs2sendhelp]

This is the definition of a kev thread.

But why we talking bout hughes/makar… he’s not even better than Clarke/zellweger

 

[Dr Pepper]

Might want to temper those expectations just a tad, OP.

 

[EdJovanovski]

Where's the no and not going to be very good option?

 

[beowulf]

Yes but in the Lane Hutson way with amazing vision on the ice and the ability to leave opposition in the dust.

 

[MasterofGrond]

When you go full homer and pretend he's Cale Makar but he's really more Shayne Gostisbehere...

And there’s nothing wrong with being Gotisbehere!

He a real, valuable NHL defenseman. Just not an elite one.

 

[FriendlyGhost92]

And there’s nothing wrong with being Gotisbehere!

He a real, valuable NHL defenseman. Just not an elite one.

There's a reason Ghost bounces from place to place.

He can rack up points, but his defense is non-NHL worthy.

 

[Fatass]

14 points in 24 games this season, he play very well in both side. He show really high offensive potential in his game. Close to score 2-3 goals this year aswell with great highlights.

Can he have the same impact of Q.Hughes or Makar?

All the options are overly positive. Like the player but don’t see him having a complete enough game to be on a winning club. Will get points, but sacrifices too much defensively to do so.

 

[lakeshirts37]

I vote “Absolutely not”