First off, F the Habs. (Fun fact I was born in Montreal)
Secondly, what a f***ing beauty this guy is. I kind of feel like this is what it was like playing against a prime Karlsson. Kids got that vibe and potentiality of greatness, imo. True stud he is.
Congrats (losers), you got a good one
He definitely wouldn't be their #1 D-man because he wouldn't have gotten the chance to be. They would have been wrong to do it, but they absolutely would have sent him down.
Who would NJ take out of the lineup? Dillon, Siegenthaler or Luke Hughes to make room for him?
You seem to be struggling with the idea that not every team is built the same way.
Only because people don't understand that a team that doesn't have Lane Hutson in their organization doesn't plan for him being there. The Devils built their roster with Luke Hughes, Dillon and Siegenthaler all penciled in on the left side. I realize it's hard for you to understand because you can only see what has happened since but a rookie wasn't beating any of those 3 out of camp.Lulz. Some of the takes in this thread are beyond belief.
Born in Montreal and not a Habs fan? I feel sad for you that you excluded yourself from greatness. What is your team?Because I'm human and salt is an important part of my body's chemistry makeup.
Only because people don't understand that a team that doesn't have Lane Hutson in their organization doesn't plan for him being there. The Devils built their roster with Luke Hughes, Dillon and Siegenthaler all penciled in on the left side. I realize it's hard for you to understand because you can only see what has happened since but a rookie wasn't beating any of those 3 out of camp.
If the Devils had Hutson in their organization they likely don't sign Dillon and keep him around, but to say they'd keep him out of camp with the roster the way it is, that is incorrect.
I know you'll read this and think that I'm saying Hutson isn't better than those 3 guys and that couldn't be further from the truth he's easily better than 2 and personally I'd take Hughes over him. The fact is the Devils don't have Hutson so they didn't plan for him.
That isn't reality though, they simply wouldn't have waived a player they just signed to a 3 year deal (Dillon) to make room for him. It doesn't matter that it would be the wrong choice but they absolutely would have sent him down to start the season.Doesn't matter if they planned it or not. If Hutson shows to be way better than the other players, you make space for him. The devils would be a much better team with Hutson than without, which is what really matters. Hutson can also play both sides.
Only because people don't understand that a team that doesn't have Lane Hutson in their organization doesn't plan for him being there. The Devils built their roster with Luke Hughes, Dillon and Siegenthaler all penciled in on the left side. I realize it's hard for you to understand because you can only see what has happened since but a rookie wasn't beating any of those 3 out of camp.
If the Devils had Hutson in their organization they likely don't sign Dillon and keep him around, but to say they'd keep him out of camp with the roster the way it is, that is incorrect.
I know you'll read this and think that I'm saying Hutson isn't better than those 3 guys and that couldn't be further from the truth he's easily better than 2 and personally I'd take Hughes over him. The fact is the Devils don't have Hutson so they didn't plan for him.
Yes I would, I get that you wouldn't but that doesn't change my opinion.Umm, no you wouldnt.
That isn't reality though, they simply wouldn't have waived a player they just signed to a 3 year deal (Dillon) to make room for him. It doesn't matter that it would be the wrong choice but they absolutely would have sent him down to start the season.
We literally see this kind of thing happen every season, a rookie plays great in camp but gets sent down because they don't need waivers or there is no room for him.
You're absolutely right that they'd be better with Hutson on their team, this goes without saying. It doesn't change anything in regards to where Hutson would have started the season.
To start the season the Devils had Hamilton, Pesce, Nemec, Casey and Kovacevic on the right side so it likely makes no difference that Hutson can play either side.
Again this isn't in way a slight on Hutson, he's an amazing player and any team would be better with him. It just doesn't change the way teams that don't have him built their rosters.
That fact completely slipped my mind, maybe he sticks around because Hughes and Pesce were hurt. If he played as well as he has in MTL I would imagine they keep him around after they came back and demoting Nemec and Casey and putting Kovacevic in the press box most nights.Devils had injuries to start the season, and thanks to that Seamus Casey made the team. So Obviously Hutson would have started with them if he was there. Kovacevic has played top 4 D on the devils all season. There is 0 argument to be made that Kovacevic would have been used over Hutson.
Devils would trade Nemec and/or Hughes for Hutson. Habs wouldnt.
/thread
As a massive habs fan and homer, what's the point in being obnoxious?Wassup.
As a massive habs fan and homer, what's the point in being obnoxious?
Don't conflate a handful of posters to an entire fanbase. Everyone speaks for themselves. There is no officially sanctioned fanbase position.What is this obsession about Lane Hutson from Devil supporters?
Almost as weird as the Xhekaj obsession from Sens supporters...
Don't conflate a handful of posters to an entire fanbase. Everyone speaks for themselves. There is no officially sanctioned fanbase position.
Only because people don't understand that a team that doesn't have Lane Hutson in their organization doesn't plan for him being there. The Devils built their roster with Luke Hughes, Dillon and Siegenthaler all penciled in on the left side. I realize it's hard for you to understand because you can only see what has happened since but a rookie wasn't beating any of those 3 out of camp.
If the Devils had Hutson in their organization they likely don't sign Dillon and keep him around, but to say they'd keep him out of camp with the roster the way it is, that is incorrect.
I know you'll read this and think that I'm saying Hutson isn't better than those 3 guys and that couldn't be further from the truth he's easily better than 2 and personally I'd take Hughes over him. The fact is the Devils don't have Hutson so they didn't plan for him.
Don't fool yourself. Those teams would do back flips to have him too. He just would just be on the 2nd pair.Dude is absolutely incredible. What a special player. Literally every team would take him on their roster expect Colorado (Makar) and Vancouver (Hughes).
What a stud.