Toggle sidebar

Lane Hutson Burgeoning Star Watch

HugeInTheShire said:
Only because people don't understand that a team that doesn't have Lane Hutson in their organization doesn't plan for him being there. The Devils built their roster with Luke Hughes, Dillon and Siegenthaler all penciled in on the left side. I realize it's hard for you to understand because you can only see what has happened since but a rookie wasn't beating any of those 3 out of camp.

If the Devils had Hutson in their organization they likely don't sign Dillon and keep him around, but to say they'd keep him out of camp with the roster the way it is, that is incorrect.

I know you'll read this and think that I'm saying Hutson isn't better than those 3 guys and that couldn't be further from the truth he's easily better than 2 and personally I'd take Hughes over him. The fact is the Devils don't have Hutson so they didn't plan for him.
Click to expand...

Umm, no you wouldnt.
 
HugeInTheShire said:
That isn't reality though, they simply wouldn't have waived a player they just signed to a 3 year deal (Dillon) to make room for him. It doesn't matter that it would be the wrong choice but they absolutely would have sent him down to start the season.

We literally see this kind of thing happen every season, a rookie plays great in camp but gets sent down because they don't need waivers or there is no room for him.

You're absolutely right that they'd be better with Hutson on their team, this goes without saying. It doesn't change anything in regards to where Hutson would have started the season.

To start the season the Devils had Hamilton, Pesce, Nemec, Casey and Kovacevic on the right side so it likely makes no difference that Hutson can play either side.

Again this isn't in way a slight on Hutson, he's an amazing player and any team would be better with him. It just doesn't change the way teams that don't have him built their rosters.
Click to expand...

Devils had injuries to start the season, and thanks to that Seamus Casey made the team. So Obviously Hutson would have started with them if he was there. Kovacevic has played top 4 D on the devils all season. There is 0 argument to be made that Kovacevic would have been used over Hutson.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gravity, Grate n Colorful Oz and HugeInTheShire
Kudo Shinichi said:
Devils had injuries to start the season, and thanks to that Seamus Casey made the team. So Obviously Hutson would have started with them if he was there. Kovacevic has played top 4 D on the devils all season. There is 0 argument to be made that Kovacevic would have been used over Hutson.
Click to expand...
That fact completely slipped my mind, maybe he sticks around because Hughes and Pesce were hurt. If he played as well as he has in MTL I would imagine they keep him around after they came back and demoting Nemec and Casey and putting Kovacevic in the press box most nights.

Only issue I can see beyond that would be that he'd get almost no special team usage as there wouldn't have been room on PP1 and he doesn't kill penalties like Kovacevic does. I think they'd work around it though.
 
JeffreyLFC said:
What is this obsession about Lane Hutson from Devil supporters?
Almost as weird as the Xhekaj obsession from Sens supporters...
Click to expand...
Don't conflate a handful of posters to an entire fanbase. Everyone speaks for themselves. There is no officially sanctioned fanbase position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane, Sasha Orlov, Grate n Colorful Oz and 1 other person
HugeInTheShire said:
Only because people don't understand that a team that doesn't have Lane Hutson in their organization doesn't plan for him being there. The Devils built their roster with Luke Hughes, Dillon and Siegenthaler all penciled in on the left side. I realize it's hard for you to understand because you can only see what has happened since but a rookie wasn't beating any of those 3 out of camp.

If the Devils had Hutson in their organization they likely don't sign Dillon and keep him around, but to say they'd keep him out of camp with the roster the way it is, that is incorrect.

I know you'll read this and think that I'm saying Hutson isn't better than those 3 guys and that couldn't be further from the truth he's easily better than 2 and personally I'd take Hughes over him. The fact is the Devils don't have Hutson so they didn't plan for him.
Click to expand...

No disrespect to Hughes but that's just silly.


Andy said:
Dude is absolutely incredible. What a special player. Literally every team would take him on their roster expect Colorado (Makar) and Vancouver (Hughes).

What a stud.
Click to expand...
Don't fool yourself. Those teams would do back flips to have him too. He just would just be on the 2nd pair.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grate n Colorful Oz
The hate from other teams fan this kid receive is hilarious. He is something special and he is a real hockey nerd, studying the game and really focus on winning. Has the right mentality and despite his size he does the right things in the D zone and he plays over 24 min a night. He also wasn't on the PP for the first 30 games of the season. We could easily argue he would be a PPG in his rookie year if he started there
 
Pretty burgeonizing player if you ask me.

A burgeonator someone could say.

Screenshot_20250331-172250.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Jurivan Demidovsky, Gains, BLNY and 4 others
Maitz said:
The hate from other teams fan this kid receive is hilarious. He is something special and he is a real hockey nerd, studying the game and really focus on winning. Has the right mentality and despite his size he does the right things in the D zone and he plays over 24 min a night. He also wasn't on the PP for the first 30 games of the season. We could easily argue he would be a PPG in his rookie year if he started there
Click to expand...
Well, he was on the PP but it was PP2.

Which, on the Habs, is more like playing short handed minutes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sasha Orlov
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom