CharleyHorse
Registered User
- Sep 28, 2022
- 385
- 948
Does anyone know if Mario LeCrosseurGoat updated his post since then? Asking for a friend,
Can't have people discussing a young guy becoming a star on hockey's future, what do you think this is?I thought lane hutson talk was not allowed anymore until he got sent to the AHL where he belongs.
I thought lane hutson talk was not allowed anymore until he got sent to the AHL where he belongs.
C'mon nowThe best offensive defenseman since PK Subban.
What a slight to Hutson.C'mon now
First off, F the Habs. (Fun fact I was born in Montreal)
Secondly, what a f***ing beauty this guy is. I kind of feel like this is what it was like playing against a prime Karlsson. Kids got that vibe and potentiality of greatness, imo. True stud he is.
Congrats (losers), you got a good one
First off, F the Habs. (Fun fact I was born in Montreal)
Secondly, what a f***ing beauty this guy is. I kind of feel like this is what it was like playing against a prime Karlsson. Kids got that vibe and potentiality of greatness, imo. True stud he is.
Congrats (losers), you got a good one
He definitely wouldn't be their #1 D-man because he wouldn't have gotten the chance to be. They would have been wrong to do it, but they absolutely would have sent him down.
Who would NJ take out of the lineup? Dillon, Siegenthaler or Luke Hughes to make room for him?
You seem to be struggling with the idea that not every team is built the same way.
Only because people don't understand that a team that doesn't have Lane Hutson in their organization doesn't plan for him being there. The Devils built their roster with Luke Hughes, Dillon and Siegenthaler all penciled in on the left side. I realize it's hard for you to understand because you can only see what has happened since but a rookie wasn't beating any of those 3 out of camp.Lulz. Some of the takes in this thread are beyond belief.
Born in Montreal and not a Habs fan? I feel sad for you that you excluded yourself from greatness. What is your team?Because I'm human and salt is an important part of my body's chemistry makeup.
Only because people don't understand that a team that doesn't have Lane Hutson in their organization doesn't plan for him being there. The Devils built their roster with Luke Hughes, Dillon and Siegenthaler all penciled in on the left side. I realize it's hard for you to understand because you can only see what has happened since but a rookie wasn't beating any of those 3 out of camp.
If the Devils had Hutson in their organization they likely don't sign Dillon and keep him around, but to say they'd keep him out of camp with the roster the way it is, that is incorrect.
I know you'll read this and think that I'm saying Hutson isn't better than those 3 guys and that couldn't be further from the truth he's easily better than 2 and personally I'd take Hughes over him. The fact is the Devils don't have Hutson so they didn't plan for him.
That isn't reality though, they simply wouldn't have waived a player they just signed to a 3 year deal (Dillon) to make room for him. It doesn't matter that it would be the wrong choice but they absolutely would have sent him down to start the season.Doesn't matter if they planned it or not. If Hutson shows to be way better than the other players, you make space for him. The devils would be a much better team with Hutson than without, which is what really matters. Hutson can also play both sides.