Luigi Lemieux
Registered User
- Sep 26, 2003
- 22,558
- 11,716
No denying his talent is off the charts even if he does have work to do defensively. Was toying with Detroit
Not exactly playing with the76 Canadiens!!He also has the 2nd worst plus minus of any defenseman.
Well raised and extremely polite young man with boatload of skill.8th in D scoring in the NHL at 20 years old is respectable.
He also has the 2nd worst plus minus of any defenseman.
He also has the worst empty net +/- at 0gf 8ga.
His true +/-, outside empty net situations, is -6, and he's 110th in GF%, which is middle of the pack, despite being a rookie playing the most minutes and being saddled with defensive blackhole Matheson (whose true +/- is -8, worst than Hutson):
Thanks for playing, better luck next time.
I always find the comparison shallow. Quinn Hughes #1 calling card is his skating. Everything stems from skating and decision making since his debut. Hutson has elite senses but without elite skating, that is the difference between a #1 and a second pairing guy with defensive warts you have to live with. Hutson will find his own niche, but the comparison is off the mark.
Assists not pointsHe has the second most points of any NHL d-man ever 35 games into his career. Larry Murphy is first. What he’s doing so far is historic.
Okay. Still historic.Assists not points
I'm actually surprised they're putting him with Matheson. Matheson plays like an unbridled wild horse, totally chaotic. In Pittsburgh we usually had him on the third pairing with Ruhwedel or Marino babysitting him on the second pair. I liked him though, fun to watch.He's by no means a defensive stalwart but Hutson is actually doing fine in his own end. You would think playing with a seasoned veteran like Matheson would give him some coverage but it's actually Hutson who has to babysit Matheson on top of being a highlight reel machine offensively. This kid is already a huge net positive player and would look much better defensively with a better partner.
The Hutson-Matheson pair is indeed absolutely wild but in all honesty there aren't any players on our roster who can take that #1RD spot. They tried Hutson with Savard, which is much more logical on paper, but Savard just isn't what he used to be anymore. At least Matheson is very good on transition so it's probably the best we can do for now although ideally he should be playing way less minutes.I'm actually surprised they're putting him with Matheson. Matheson plays like an unbridled wild horse, totally chaotic. In Pittsburgh we usually had him on the third pairing with Ruhwedel or Marino babysitting him on the second pair. I liked him though, fun to watch.