Lane Hutson Burgeoning Star Watch

Grate n Colorful Oz

Pure Laine Hutson
Jun 12, 2007
36,699
35,430
Hockey Mecca
He also has the 2nd worst plus minus of any defenseman.

He also has the worst empty net +/- at 0gf 8ga.

His true +/-, outside empty net situations, is -6, and he's 110th in GF%, which is middle of the pack, despite being a rookie playing the most minutes and being saddled with defensive blackhole Matheson (whose true +/- is -8, worst than Hutson):

Screenshot-20241222-141550-Samsung-Internet.jpg


Thanks for playing, better luck next time.
 

Andrei79

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
16,768
31,491
He also has the worst empty net +/- at 0gf 8ga.

His true +/-, outside empty net situations, is -6, and he's 110th in GF%, which is middle of the pack, despite being a rookie playing the most minutes and being saddled with defensive blackhole Matheson (whose true +/- is -8, worst than Hutson):

Screenshot-20241222-141550-Samsung-Internet.jpg


Thanks for playing, better luck next time.

Always love seeing the main board clowns be embarrassed, as per usual.
 

JianYang

Registered User
Sep 29, 2017
19,873
19,633
I always find the comparison shallow. Quinn Hughes #1 calling card is his skating. Everything stems from skating and decision making since his debut. Hutson has elite senses but without elite skating, that is the difference between a #1 and a second pairing guy with defensive warts you have to live with. Hutson will find his own niche, but the comparison is off the mark.

I see some similarities in playing with the puck. The way they both straddle the line to find open lanes or have enough poise to see things open up before delivering a puck to an open man.

Hughes has obviously refined his game since his rookie season to become one of the best but living on the west coast and seeing both these guys sort of regularly, I see the parallels.
 

Hostile Offer

Artist formerly known as Eagle Peninsula
Jun 17, 2017
7,814
5,934
Finland
He's by no means a defensive stalwart but Hutson is actually doing fine in his own end. You would think playing with a seasoned veteran like Matheson would give him some coverage but it's actually Hutson who has to babysit Matheson on top of being a highlight reel machine offensively. This kid is already a huge net positive player and would look much better defensively with a better partner.
 

Luigi Lemieux

Registered User
Sep 26, 2003
22,555
11,703
He's by no means a defensive stalwart but Hutson is actually doing fine in his own end. You would think playing with a seasoned veteran like Matheson would give him some coverage but it's actually Hutson who has to babysit Matheson on top of being a highlight reel machine offensively. This kid is already a huge net positive player and would look much better defensively with a better partner.
I'm actually surprised they're putting him with Matheson. Matheson plays like an unbridled wild horse, totally chaotic. In Pittsburgh we usually had him on the third pairing with Ruhwedel or Marino babysitting him on the second pair. I liked him though, fun to watch.
 

Hostile Offer

Artist formerly known as Eagle Peninsula
Jun 17, 2017
7,814
5,934
Finland
I'm actually surprised they're putting him with Matheson. Matheson plays like an unbridled wild horse, totally chaotic. In Pittsburgh we usually had him on the third pairing with Ruhwedel or Marino babysitting him on the second pair. I liked him though, fun to watch.
The Hutson-Matheson pair is indeed absolutely wild but in all honesty there aren't any players on our roster who can take that #1RD spot. They tried Hutson with Savard, which is much more logical on paper, but Savard just isn't what he used to be anymore. At least Matheson is very good on transition so it's probably the best we can do for now although ideally he should be playing way less minutes.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad