Kingsfan1
Registered User
Next Karlsson ?? Damn might end up being the steal of the draft . I read an article few days ago don’t remember if it was a Kings scout or someone else but they said if he knew defense little better he would go to top 15
He may have 5 points but he's also a -2.
Offense from the back end is icing on the cake, but we need a strong base to support the top layers as well.
Yep. Plus minus on it’s own, without context, literally means nothing... used properly it’s a superb stat.Tied for team lead in scoring. Highest +/- is +4. Lowest is -5. He seems to be on par with the team as a whole. Not fantastic, but it's not like everyone is a plus, and he's the lone defensive liability
Another assist to keep the streak going.
? He drew Veleno's defender to him and then got him the puck in a position where Veleno could just walk in and shoot from the faceoff circle. Surely that's worth more than 1%...For some plays, credit should be shared 50/50 on the passer and the scorer. Other times, it's 75/25 in favor of the passer setting up an amazing play. This play, however, is 99/1 in favor of Veleno, who did all of the work.
? He drew Veleno's defender to him and then got him the puck in a position where Veleno could just walk in and shoot from the faceoff circle. Surely that's worth more than 1%...
Speaking of Veleno, is it too early for me to do the “I told you so” dance about wanting Veleno over Kupari?
Speaking of Veleno, is it too early for me to do the “I told you so” dance about wanting Veleno over Kupari?
Not a crazy call at all but it's definitely early to be turning the page on Kupari too
He was struggling in Ontario. Depended way, way too much on trying to go around the outside of defenders and had real issues with reading plays as they developed on the cycle.Had he not tore his ACL and scored 12 goals, which is what his pace was in his first season on smaller ice, would folks be more positive about him? It seemed like he was starting to figure it out prior to the injury.
He was struggling in Ontario. Depended way, way too much on trying to go around the outside of defenders and had real issues with reading plays as they developed on the cycle.
I wasn't happy at all with his pick, but I think the injury could be a blessing in disguise. He won't be at full throttle for a while, so hopefully he will learn to better work within the team game since he can't so easily fall back on his skating as a default.
Had he not tore his ACL and scored 12 goals, which is what his pace was in his first season on smaller ice, would folks be more positive about him? It seemed like he was starting to figure it out prior to the injury.
He was struggling in Ontario. Depended way, way too much on trying to go around the outside of defenders and had real issues with reading plays as they developed on the cycle.
I wasn't happy at all with his pick, but I think the injury could be a blessing in disguise. He won't be at full throttle for a while, so hopefully he will learn to better work within the team game since he can't so easily fall back on his skating as a default.
Man, here I thought I was being hard on Kupari, but some people really going in on him here.
Apparently because Veleno scored 11 goals and 23 points and he's been lifted over Kupari here.
He's played 27 games on this continent.
Doesn't matter, he had the same issues in Finland. Everything he does is predicated on taking his man wide. He doesn't play a team game, its very individualistic and reliant upon physical gifts. There just isn't much else to him at this point. He isn't strong defensively or along the wall, and doesn't have a particularly great shot.
I was much, much happier with the Thomas pick the next morning. Thomas plays within coverages, Kupari tries to stretch the lines every shift. I don't think he is going to make it to the NHL unless he adds a competent cycle game to his tool box.
So ... Pearson type player ...Doesn't matter, he had the same issues in Finland. Everything he does is predicated on taking his man wide. He doesn't play a team game, its very individualistic and reliant upon physical gifts. There just isn't much else to him at this point. He isn't strong defensively or along the wall, and doesn't have a particularly great shot.
I was much, much happier with the Thomas pick the next morning. Thomas plays within coverages, Kupari tries to stretch the lines every shift. I don't think he is going to make it to the NHL unless he adds a competent cycle game to his tool box.
Think more like in between Jakob Silfverberg and Mikkel Boedker, a guy who scores a dozen very pretty, memorable goals a year, has speed to burn, but doesn't do terribly much. Won't hurt you, just leaves the impression that he should be doing a lot more with the tools at his disposal.So ... Pearson type player ...
sounds reasonable to me for a late 1st pick with wheels.
Kuparis one blessing in disguise was that he lost almost no development time versus his peers because of covid.My concern with Kupari is the combination ofvrehabbing after missing so much time due to injury while learning to play on North American ice.
For a player who's very self-reliant on-ice while dependent on high-end skill, I think he's going to have a lot of struggles.
He's not a bad prospect, but he's outside my top 10
I just think he'll settle in as a modestly effective 3rd liner with some skill to keep people honest. He has the speed and agility to make things happen and I'm sure he'll learn NA hockey some more (and the biggest thing learn how to use his teammates better).