- May 9, 2014
- 5,805
- 8,213
’If’ underpins every move that is made.But that's the issue with with it.
"If."
Hope is the strategy. Again.
I share your concerns around strategy but a single trade is tactical. So does it fit the strategy (if there is one)? Not sure yet. In a vacuum the trade is fine, even though I hate it (complete juxtaposition) but how it fits into the big picture we can only assess after the fact.
In terms of some of the discussion around where QB and Turcotte fit long term. I’m not too worried about space to move either Byfield or Turcotte into the middle as part of the top 9 (as early as next year) because whilst they won’t trade Kopitar they would be able to move Danault. Kopitar can then assume a lesser role. The arrival of PLD moves Danault down the pecking order, so if they need to move a C it’ll be him that goes.
I dunno, I’m just moving pieces on the chess board to see how it might evolve so that when Kopitar retires our top 3 C’s are PLD, Byfield and Turcotte. Both Byfield and Turcotte will be better through the middle so should ultimately be used there (or moved). Wishful thinking, but we’d probably be retooling again at that point anyway, which would be criminal because a slower rebuild could have given us a 5-7 year window near the top of the West. That looks unlikely now.
On an aside… I definitely think having Clarke or Spence in the AHL is a bad place to be because it hurts the team long term. Whilst we might be a better team this year we are an away off being definite contenders so not having the future of top 4 D in the NHL when both are ready is strategically highly suspect. At this point I think I prefer one of Spence, Roy or Clarke playing 3LD over the other options because they need to be playing.
Slightly OT but that’s my current brain dump.