A GM out there is going to see that for that mid/late round first you can have a PPG player on a historically bad team who has the potential for up to 50 goals, big frame, has the unique trait he can legit score from anywhere on the ice that it breaks analytical models, good passer, a historically good power play merchant, defensive/2way game has improved the past few years at 5.5-6mil. There is a reason y'all are putting him in your top 6 and discussing him in depth. Players like that don't come on the market often, especially one in the prime of their career. All his injuries have not been repeats or nagging issues. Some GM out there will bite and say I can fix him and y'all will be declaring them a genius potentially in 6 months time if Laine gets back to form.
The only time Laine was ever a PPG player was 3 years ago when he played 2/3 of the year only.
Also, whoever has an expendable mid to late first round pick probably doesn’t have 8.7M available on the cap for a player that has on and off ice issues as well as health issues.
It might be a hard pill to swallow for Jacket’s fans but it’s going to be hard as is for the team to move out of that contract let alone expect a return a fills a need for the team. We need to be realistic here.
You’re discussing Laine as if he was a solid two-way player when in fact he’s lazy defensively, can’t carry a line and is one of the slowest player in the league all while having some sort of god complex thinking he’s one of the best player in the league and expect to be paid as such. Even if fully healthy I wouldn’t give that contract to the guy, let alone move positive assets to bring in on my team.
As for the bolded, you might be right. However, the chances that he doesn’t pan out as expected and that the gm regrets acquiring him and regretting it is much, much higher than Laine miraculously coming back healthy and playing a different (2-way) game and being committed both offensively and defensively on a regular basis.