apocalypse
Dean Lombardi's Yes Man
Why? He'd be a perfect player to keep around on the bottom six. He's cheap and can be a physical presence on a team that desperately needs physicality.I question Grundstrom's future with the team.
Why? He'd be a perfect player to keep around on the bottom six. He's cheap and can be a physical presence on a team that desperately needs physicality.I question Grundstrom's future with the team.
I don't see a spot for him next year.Why? He'd be a perfect player to keep around on the bottom six. He's cheap and can be a physical presence on a team that desperately needs physicality.
All the more reason for a player like brown to not return.I don't see a spot for him next year.
We disagree,I expect Brown to be in the line up if Brown and Blake can come to a reasonable price and if Brown accepts a 3rd line role.If Brown and Blake can't come to a mutual agreement,you might see Brown agreeing to a deadline trade.I am not a Grundstrom person nor do I think he will he on this team next year.All the more reason for a player like brown to not return.
Having thoughts of retaining a 37 year old shell, while moving on from a VERY effective young player who plays a similar role is a fools errand.
Why is that?We disagree,I expect Brown to be in the line up if Brown and Blake can come to a reasonable price and if Brown accepts a 3rd line role.If Brown and Blake can't come to a mutual agreement,you might see Brown agreeing to a deadline trade.I am not a Grundstrom person nor do I think he will he on this team next year.
I think we've players in Ontario that are better,not enough spots.Why is that?
Yeah but I see Grundstrom as a big player who can set the tone for the team and LA needs more players like this. We are a small team and get pushed around night in night out.I think we've players in Ontario that are better,not enough spots.
Where does Vilardi go?JAD? Possibly Turcotte?Why? He'd be a perfect player to keep around on the bottom six. He's cheap and can be a physical presence on a team that desperately needs physicality.
Anderson-DolanWe disagree,I expect Brown to be in the line up if Brown and Blake can come to a reasonable price and if Brown accepts a 3rd line role.If Brown and Blake can't come to a mutual agreement,you might see Brown agreeing to a deadline trade.I am not a Grundstrom person nor do I think he will he on this team next year.
Vilardi plays in top 6 when he's ready. JAD can be traded. and Turcotte can wait when 3c opens up. He'll probably take over 2nd line c and PD moves down to 3rd.Where does Vilardi go?JAD? Possibly Turcotte?
Me too. The Kings could really use that one goal and -5 right now.
Maatta, believe it or not, hasn't been as bad as he was the first 25 games. He's done the job, and thats all that matters.
I think you resign Maata. He's come around the last few games and he's a big body on defense. LA needs the big bodies.thank you for not using the obvious pun. I have to admit that Maatta has been ok lately. However I do not see any chance of a long term fit with the Kings, Clague at least had a sliver.
Frankly, its the fact that Blake actually said "expected goals" instead of just "goals ". The implication there is that the analytics - which are purely optics - are judged to be below par. I see nothing wrong with the 5 x 5 offense whatsoever, but the PP needs an awful lot of help. And the biggest problem is the hesitancy to move the puck quickly from Kopitar and Doughty. I don't think anyone believes that analytics are going to help them decide to remove either from the first unit due to the "living legend" status both possess.
And the Shore point is dead on. I would also suggest that the opposite is something to be afraid of: players whose value isn't based on analytics won't be given the same chances that fancy stat darlings get. Simply having a higher volume of shots from close to the slot only theoretically correlates to success, its not a measure of quality, just quantity. And quantity is no indicator of anything without filtering through other indicators. So just trust your experience and don't let misleading, or potentially misleading data points have any undue influence.
Hockey is above all a game of passion and resiliency. Top players scoring, bottom players setting the pace and changing the tone. Momentum is so valuable, and there is no metric for making the right decision at the right time. Its assumed that those decisions will lead to a positive result that can be justified by a metric, but there just isn't one out there that measures heart and timing. The most important plays of the game don't always occur late in the third.
In order for it to become "a Mike Richards situation" they would have to sign Brown to a 6 year contract extension at $5.75M per season.
We shall see,What if Blake brings in a scoring fwd in the offseason,then it really gets wild.Anderson-Dolan
Villardi
Andersson
Grundstrom
Turcotte
Any of these players would be better suited for that exact 3rd line role, and aren’t 37 years old in the twilight of their careers. Not to mention the expiring waiver exemption on some of them.
Brown returning would be an absolute kick to the balls of forward progress. Let’s call it a career & plan the Jersey retirement. For gods sake.
thank you for not using the obvious pun. I have to admit that Maatta has been ok lately. However I do not see any chance of a long term fit with the Kings, Clague at least had a sliver.
thank you for not using the obvious pun. I have to admit that Maatta has been ok lately. However I do not see any chance of a long term fit with the Kings, Clague at least had a sliver.
In order for it to become "a Mike Richards situation" they would have to sign Brown to a 6 year contract extension at $5.75M per season.
The Kings built a formidable prospect pool in a short amount of time, which resulted in a group that, for a couple of years, was adding without subtracting. Now prospects are starting to become players and the addition (which still included four high picks and a true star prospect from the 2021 draft class) isn’t outpacing the subtraction at quite the same rate.
The result is, after two consecutive years as my No. 1-ranked pool, a precipitous drop all the way to… *gasp*… second place!
Out are Arthur Kaliyev, Tobias Bjornfot, Rasmus Kupari, Kale Clague, Cole Hults, Mikey Anderson, Sean Durzi, Lias Anderson and Jacob Moverare due to some combination of NHL graduation, trade, or age. That’s nine pieces. That’s significant changeover.
In are Brandt Clarke, Francesco Pinelli, Kirill Kirsanov, and Samuel Helenius.
And somehow the Kings pool is still, without question, the deepest in the league — and a pool that I debated keeping at No. 1. It has star quality at the top, depth in quantity of legitimate NHL prospects into the late teens, and still 24 prospects worth of inclusion here. There are forwards and now defencemen of all shapes and sides, with the best depth of right-shot defencemen in the league. Really the only hole in the pool, especially after adding Clarke — and even after all of the turnover — is in net.
It’s remains an incredible group all told.
I think you resign Maata. He's come around the last few games and he's a big body on defense. LA needs the big bodies.
We'll see what Blake does around March 10th at the deadline.